Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

 1     I, 2,2 |       rivalry of two great sees. Doctrinal issues, quiescent since
 2     I, 2,2 |         wavered during the great doctrinal disputes, but Rome for the
 3     I, 2,3 |   instruction; and finally their doctrinal ~importance. ~ The question
 4     I, 2,3 |   Tradition [see p. 214]). ~ The doctrinal significance of icons. Here
 5     I, 3,1 |          spoken of the different doctrinal approaches in east and west;
 6     I, 3,2 |          101). The long-standing doctrinal disagreements were now rein-~
 7     I, 3,3 |        Ecumenical, yet possess a doctrinal authority in Orthodox theol-~
 8     I, 4,1 |     century, the great period of doctrinal controversies, the age of
 9     I, 5,2 |        do ~not write any more on doctrinal matters; and if you do write,
10    II, 0,11|      Bible, to the Creed, to the doctrinal definitions of the Ecumenical~
11    II, 0,11|        speak as if the period of doctrinal formulation were wholly
12    II, 0,12|          Councils: The Creed~The doctrinal definitions of an Ecumenical
13    II, 0,12|    individual bishops. While the doctrinal decisions~of General Councils
14    II, 0,12|         to that possessed by the~doctrinal statements of an Ecumenical
15    II, 0,12|         Ecumenical Council). The doctrinal decisions of an Ecumenical
16    II, 0,12| following are the chief Orthodox doctrinal statements since 787:~1
17    II, 0,12|      faith.~6. Canon Law~Besides doctrinal definitions, the Ecumenical
18    II, 0,12|  clarification of Canon Law.~The doctrinal definitions of the Councils
19    II, 0,12|        as such cannot claim; for doctrinal definitions deal with eternal
20    II, 6,2 |   interpreting their traditional doctrinal position. A~number of western
21    II, 6,2 |         1957. A large measure of doctrinal agreement was reached~64~
22    II, 6,2 |       and an important series~of doctrinal statements has been issued,
23    II, 6,2 |       was made to face points of doctrinal disagreement.~Questions
24    II, 6,2 |      great progress towards full doctrinal agreement, and many — particularly
25    II, 6,2 |    extreme~ambiguity of Anglican doctrinal formularies, the wide variety
26    II, 7,1 |  Theology: Historical Trends and Doctrinal Themes, New York,~1974 (