Part, Chapter, Paragraph
1 I, 2,2| dared to speak of man.s ~.deification. (in Greek, theosis). If
2 I, 2,2| God, was to ~render man.s deification impossible. Only if Christ
3 I, 3,1| of redemption, Greeks of deification; and so on. ~Like the schools
4 I, 3,3| process of redemption and deification. But the balance between ~
5 I, 3,3| God, to uphold man.s full deification and entire redemption. That
6 I, 6,3| the Orthodox doctrine of deification and union with God. It shows
7 II, 1,5| well be defined in terms of deification. Basil described man as
8 II, 1,5| god, to attain theosis,~‘deification’ or ‘divinization.’ For
9 II, 1,5| and redemption mean his deification.~Behind the doctrine of
10 II, 1,5| Behind the doctrine of deification there lies the idea of man
11 II, 1,5| The Orthodox doctrine of deification,~so far from being unscriptural (
12 II, 1,5| Fourth Gospel.~The idea of deification must always be understood
13 II, 1,5| Church, while speaking of deification and union, rejects all forms~
14 II, 1,5| god by grace or by status.~Deification is something that involves
15 II, 1,5| Romans 12:1). The full deification~of the body must wait, however,
16 II, 1,5| physical.~21~This talk of deification and union, of the transfiguration
17 II, 1,5| points must be made.~First, deification is not something reserved
18 II, 1,5| of sin. On the contrary, deification always presupposes a continued
19 II, 1,5| with moral rules.~Fourthly, deification is not a solitary but a ‘
20 II, 1,5| process. We have said that deification~means ‘following the commandments;’
21 II, 1,5| is nothing selfish about deification; for~only if he loves his
22 II, 1,5| do not issue in action. Deification, while it includes the heights
23 II, 1,5| aspect. When we think of deification,~we must think of the Hesychasts
24 II, 1,5| ways, but one.~Finally, deification presupposes life in the
25 II, 5,2| communicates to it the power of deification ... Shining through the
|