Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

 1     I,Intro |      tinct from any religious system in the west. Yet those who
 2     I,Intro |         4~ This decentralized system of independent local Churches
 3     I, 2,2  |     among the great sees. The system later ~known among Orthodox
 4     I, 2,2  |   must be avoided. First, the system of Patriarchs and Metropolitans
 5     I, 2,2  |       cast his vote. ~ 13~The system of the Pentarchy does not
 6     I, 2,4  |   Great. ~(This semi-eremitic system is found not only in the
 7     I, 4,1  |    Slavs: a fully articulated system of Christian doc-~trine
 8     I, 4,1  |      made even ~firmer by the system of creating independent
 9     I, 4,1  |        and in particular ~the system of national Churches, have
10     I, 5,1  |      III (1977). ~ The millet system performed one invaluable
11     I, 5,1  |     caught up in a degrading ~system of corruption and simony.
12     I, 5,1  |      in the Turkish political system. The Patriarch resisted
13     I, 6,3  |       the Holy Synod. ~ ~ The system of Church government which
14     I, 7,6  |     attended a seminary. This system has had certain undeni-~
15     I, 7,6  |       years, a change in this system has become nec-~essary:
16     I, 7,7  |     000 faithful. The Turkish system, whereby the head of the
17    II, 0,11 |    Icons — in fact, the whole system of doctrine, Church government,~
18    II, 0,11 |      intellectual assent to a system of~doctrine; for Tradition
19    II, 3,1  |      nothing good about their system.’ Traveling~next to Germany
20    II, 3,1  |      not only an intellectual system apprehended by the~clergy
21    II, 3,2  |   west, there is an elaborate~system of symbols, involving every
22    II, 4,4  | clearly than does the western system, that in confession it is
23    II, 4,5  |       and Cyprus~— a modified system of election still exists.