Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

 1     I, 2,2|        and by a burning zeal for social right-~eousness. Of all
 2     I, 2,4|      Empire did not overlook its social obligations, and ~one of
 3     I, 2,4|         community life. Giving a social emphasis to monasti-~cism,
 4     I, 4,2|       the same emphasis upon the social implications of Christianity
 5     I, 4,2|     there such highly organized .social services. as in ~tenth-century
 6     I, 4,2| Theodosius was conscious of the ~social consequences of Christianity,
 7     I, 4,2|      Vladimir in his concern for social justice and his desire to
 8     I, 4,3|       succeeded in balancing the social ~and mystical aspects of
 9     I, 5,1|       effects of ~an unrelenting social pressure. ~ Nor was this
10     I, 6,1|          Sergius ~had united the social with the mystical side of
11     I, 6,1|       Possessors ~emphasized the social obligations of monasticism:
12     I, 6,1|          controverse sur le rôle social de l.Église. La querelle ~
13     I, 6,1|       often performed a valuable social role: simply because they
14     I, 6,3|           the chief cen-~ters of social work in Russia up to this
15     I, 6,3|       from all ~participation in social work. Peter.s successors
16     I, 6,3|        centers. But although the social work of the ~Church was
17     I, 6,3|         liturgical prayer and to social work, and in ~this way he
18     I, 6,3|  mystical with the corporate and social aspect ~of the monastic
19     I, 7,4|         material. It ~undertakes social work, combating poverty
20     I, 7,9|          many forms of Christian social action. They need to .be
21    II, 1,1|               God in Trinity~Our social programme, said the Russian
22    II, 1,5|         is not a solitary but a ‘social’ process. We have said that