Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

 1     I, 2,2|        not accept the doctrine of Papal authority set forth in the
 2     I, 3,1|        matters in particular: the Papal claims and the filioque.
 3     I, 3,1|           as an intruder ~and the Papal coronation as an act of
 4     I, 3,1|           di-~rect conflict . the Papal claims and the filioque.
 5     I, 3,1|           open conflict ~over the Papal claims, but the divergence
 6     I, 3,1|          different conceptions of Papal au-~thority and recited
 7     I, 3,2|      dispute clearly involved the Papal claims. Nicholas was a great
 8     I, 3,2| voluntarily to the inquiry by the Papal legates, ~and that his action
 9     I, 3,2|         taken as a recognition of Papal supremacy. This (among other ~
10     I, 3,2| Patriarchate. ~ Soon not only the Papal claims but the filioque
11     I, 3,2|         he attempt to enforce the Papal claims in the east. Perhaps
12     I, 3,2|   doctrine . the filioque and the Papal claims . which brought about ~
13     I, 3,3|           agreed to recognize the Papal claims and to recite the
14     I, 3,3|        Purgatory, azymes, and the Papal claims; ~and this was signed
15     I, 3,3|         the Orthodox accepted the Papal claims (al-~though here
16    II, 1,1|          too great an emphasis~on Papal authority.~Such in outline
17    II, 2,1|      Council; where Rome stresses Papal infallibility, Orthodox
18    II, 6,2|          all the filioque and the Papal claims.~Once again many
19    II, 6,2|     considers the question of the~Papal claims. Orthodox find themselves
20    II, 6,2|          Catholic doctrine of the Papal~claims has begun to appear
21    II, 6,2|         the Vatican statements on Papal jurisdiction~and infallibility,
22    II, 6,2|           what the true nature of Papal primacy is from the Orthodox~