Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

 1     I, 3,3 |          taken up by Saint Gregory Palamas (1296-1359), Arch-~bishop
 2     I, 3,3 |           ac-~cept the theology of Palamas. ~ Gregory began by reaffirming
 3     I, 3,3 |          Hesychasts receive is (so Palamas argued) not a vision of
 4     I, 3,3 |      Uncreated Light ~of Thabor. ~ Palamas, therefore, preserved God.
 5     I, 3,3 |       assertion. Certainly Gregory Palamas ~was no revolutionary innovator,
 6     I, 3,3 |          contemporaries of Gregory Palamas was the lay theologian Nicholas
 7     I, 3,3 |    together in Byzantine theology. Palamas and his circle did not regard
 8     I, 4,3 |            contemporary of Gregory Palamas, and it is not impossible
 9     I, 5,1 |           professors. Thus Gregory Palamas ~was still read, for his
10     I, 5,1 |         not a single citation from Palamas; and ~his case is typical.
11     I, 5,1 |          one of the chief works of Palamas, The Triads in Defence of
12    II, 0,11|          Florovsky, ‘Saint Gregory Palamas and the Tradition of the
13    II, 0,12|            New Theologian, Gregory Palamas, Mark~of Ephesus. Indeed,
14    II, 1,1 |            nearness to it (Gregory Palamas, P.G.~150, 1176c (quoted
15    II, 1,1 |          1283 to 1289,~and Gregory Palamas — went somewhat further
16    II, 1,1 |            Spirit; and (as Gregory Palamas put it)~‘personal characteristics
17    II, 1,1 | Introduction à 1’étude de Grégoire Palamas, Paris, 1959, p. 294). The
18    II, 1,2 |          His image,’ wrote Gregory Palamas, ‘the word man means neither
19    II, 1,5 |            In the words of Gregory Palamas: ‘If in the age to come
20    II, 7,3 |   Meyendorff,~! A Study of Gregory Palamas, London, 1964.~! St. Gregory
21    II, 7,3 |        London, 1964.~! St. Gregory Palamas and Orthodox Spirituality,