Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

 1     I, 3,3|                 Gregory developed the ~distinction between the essence and
 2     I, 3,3|              but not His essence. This distinction between God.s essence (ousia)
 3     I, 3,3|                  Gregory accepted this distinction. He ~affirmed, as emphatically
 4     I, 5,1|               the ~Mohammedans drew no distinction between religion and politics:
 5     I, 5,2| transubstantiation but ~the Scholastic distinction between substance and accidents (
 6    II, 1,1|             apophatic theology and the distinction between essence and energies;
 7    II, 1,1|             P.G. 94, 809A)); ‘both~the distinction and the union alike are
 8    II, 1,1|                 In the same way a~firm distinction must be drawn between the
 9    II, 1,5|         understood in the light of the distinction between~God’s essence and
10    II, 2,4|           alone. In Greek theology the distinction is very clearly marked:~
11    II, 4,3|           together with the Scholastic distinction~between Substance and Accidents (
12    II, 4,3|               In medieval philosophy a distinction is drawn between the substance
13    II, 4,3|                in alio). Applying this distinction to the Eucharist, we arrive
14    II, 4,5|             honour~for priest-monks of distinction.~Higumenos. Among the Greeks,
15    II, 4,7|        therefore~be no sharp and rigid distinction between bodily and spiritual