Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

1     I, 3,3|       called . ~speaks of God in negative terms. God cannot be properly
2     I, 3,3| therefore less misleading to use negative ~language about God rather
3     I, 3,3|          Moses, 2, 163 [77A]). ~ Negative theology reaches its classic
4     I, 3,3|         who made greatest use of negative theology . Greg-~ory of
5     I, 3,3|        the apophatic language of negative theology, these writers ~
6     I, 3,3|  emphatically as any exponent of negative theology, that God is in
7    II, 1,1|   corrected by the employment of negative language.~Our positive statements
8    II, 6,2|         constructive and less in negative and~polemical terms, then
9    II, 6,2|      question. While returning a negative answer at the present moment,