Part I: History.
Introduction
Orthodoxy is not just a kind of Roman
Catholicism without the Pope, but something quite dis-
tinct from any religious system in the
west. Yet those who look more closely at this .unknown
world. will discover much in it which,
while different, is yet curiously familiar. .But that is what
I have always believed!. Such has been the
reaction of many, on learning more fully about the
Orthodox Church and what it teaches; and
they are partly right. For more than nine hundred
years the Greek East and the Latin West
have been growing steadily apart, each
following its
own way, yet in the early centuries of
Christendom both sides can find common ground. Athana-
sius and Basil lived in the east, but they
belong also to the west; and Orthodox
who live in
France, Britain, or Ireland can in their turn look upon the national
saints of these lands . Alban
and Patrick, Cuthbert and Bede,
Geneviève of Paris and Augustine of Canterbury . not as
strangers but as members of their own
Church. All Europe was once as much part of Orthodoxy
as Greece and Christian Russia are today.
Robert Curzon, traveling through the Levant in the 1830s in search of manuscripts
which he
could buy
at bargain prices, was disconcerted to find that the Patriarch of Constantinople had
never heard of the Archbishop of
Canterbury. Matters have certainly changed since then. Travel
has become incomparably easier; the
physical barriers have been broken down. And travel is no
longer necessary: a citizen of western
Europe or America need no longer leave his own country
in order to observe the Orthodox Church at
first hand. Greeks journeying westward from choice
or economic necessity, and Slavs driven westward by persecution, have brought their Church
with them, establishing across all Europe and America a network of dioceses and parishes, theo-
logical colleges and monasteries. Most
important of all, in many different communions during
2
the present century there has grown up a compelling and unprecedented
desire for the visible
unity of
all Christians, and this has
given rise to a new interest in the Orthodox Church. The
Greco-Russian diaspora was scattered over
the world at the very moment when western Chris-
tians, in their concern for reunion, were
becoming conscious of the relevance of Orthodoxy, and
anxious to learn more about it. In reunion
discussions the contribution of the Orthodox Church
has often proved unexpectedly
illuminating: precisely because the Orthodox have a different
background from the west, they have been
able to open up fresh lines of thought, and to suggest
long-forgotten solutions to old
difficulties.
The west has never lacked men whose conception of Christendom was not
restricted to Can-
terbury, Geneva, and Rome; yet in the past such men were voices
crying in the wilderness. It is
now no longer so. The effects of an alienation
which has lasted for more than nine centuries can-
not be quickly undone, but at least a
beginning has been made.
What is meant by .the Orthodox Church.? The divisions which have brought
about the pre-
sent fragmentation of Christendom occurred
in three main stages, at intervals of roughly five
hundred years. The first stage in the separation came in the fifth and
sixth centuries, when the
.Lesser. or .Separated. eastern Churches
became divided from the main body of Christians.
These Churches fall into two groups, the Nestorian Church of Persia, and the five Monophysite
Churches of Armenia, Syria (the so-called .Jacobite. Church), Egypt (the Coptic Church), Ethio-
pia, and India. The Nestorians and Monophysites passed
out of western consciousness even more
completely than the Orthodox Church was
later to do. When Rabban Sauma, a Nestorian monk
from Peking, visited the west in 1288 (he traveled as
far as Bordeaux, where he gave communion
to King Edward I of England), he discussed theology with the Pope and
Cardinals at Rome, yet
they never seem to have realized that from
their point of view he was a heretic. As a result of this
first division, Orthodoxy became
restricted on its eastward side mainly to the Greek-speaking
world. Then came the second separation,
conventionally dated to the year 1054. The main body
of Christians now became divided into two
communions: in western Europe, the Roman Catholic
Church under the Pope of Rome; in the Byzantine Empire, the Orthodox Church of the East.
Orthodoxy was now limited on its westward
side as well. The third separation, between Rome
and the Reformers in the sixteenth
century, is not here our direct concern.
It
is interesting to note how cultural and ecclesiastical divisions coincide. Christianity,
while
universal in its mission, has tended in
practice to be associated with three cultures: the Semitic,
the Greek, and the Latin. As a result of
the first separation the Semitic Christians of Syria, with
their flourishing school of theologians and writers, were cut off from the rest of
Christendom.
Then followed the second separation, which
drove a wedge between the Greek and the Latin tra-
ditions in Christianity. So it has come
about that in Orthodoxy the primary cultural influence has
been that of Greece. Yet it must not therefore be thought
that the Orthodox Church is exclusively
a Greek Church and nothing else, since
Syriac and Latin Fathers also have a place in the fullness
of Orthodox tradition.
While the Orthodox Church became bounded first on the eastern and then
on the western
side, it expanded to the north. In 863
Saint Cyril and Saint Methodius, the Apostles of the Slavs,
traveled northward to undertake missionary
work beyond the frontiers of the Byzantine Empire,
and their efforts led eventually to the
conversion of Bulgaria, Serbia, and Russia. As the Byzan-
tine power dwindled, these newer Churches
of the north increased in importance, and on the fall
of Constantinople to the Turks in 1453 the Principality of
Moscow was ready to take Byzan-
tium.s place as the protector of the
Orthodox world. Within the last 150 years there has been a
partial reversal of the situation.
Although Constantinople itself still remains in Turkish hands, a
3
pale shadow of its former glory, the
Church in Greece is free once more; but Russia and the other
Slavonic peoples have passed in their turn
under the rule of a non-Christian government.
Such are the main stages which have determined the external development
of the Orthodox
Church. Geographically its primary
area of distribution lies in eastern Europe, in Russia, and
along the coasts of the eastern Mediterranean.
It is composed at present of the following self-
governing or .autocephalous. Churches (After each Church an approximate
estimate of size is given. Like
all ecclesiastical
statistics, these figures are to be treated with caution, and they are in any
case intended merely as a
rough comparative guide. For
many Orthodox Churches,
particularly those in
communist countries, no up-to-date
statistics are available.
For the most part the figures indicate nominal rather than active membership):
The four
ancient Patriarchates: Constantinople, Alexandria, Antioch and Jerusalem. Though
greatly reduced in size, these four
Churches for historical reasons occupy a special position in the
Orthodox Church, and rank first in honor.
The heads of these four Churches bear the title Patri-
arch.
Eleven other autocephalous Churches: Russia, Romania, Serbia (in Yugoslavia), Bulgaria, Geor-
gia, Cyprus, Poland, Albania, Czechoslovakia and Sinai.
All except three of these Churches . Czechoslovakia, Poland, and Albania . are in coun-
tries where the Christian population is
entirely or predominantly Orthodox. The Churches of
Greece, Cyprus, and Sinai are Greek; five of the others
. Russia, Serbia, Bulgaria, Czechoslo-
vakia, Poland . are Slavonic. The heads of the Russian,
Romanian, Serbian, and Bulgarian
Churches are known by the title Patriarch; the head of the Georgian Church is called Catholicos-
Patriarch; the heads of the other churches are
called either Archbishop or Metropolitan.
There are in addition several Churches which, while self-governing in
most respects, have
not
yet attained full independence. These are termed .autonomous. but not
.autocephalous.:
Finland, Japan and China.
There are ecclesiastical provinces in western Europe, in North and South America, and in
Australia, which depend on the different
Patriarchates and autocephalous Churches. In some ar-
eas this Orthodox .diaspora. is slowly
achieving self-government. In particular, steps have been
taken to form an autocephalous Orthodox
Church in America, but this has not yet been officially
recognized by the majority of other
Orthodox Churches.
The Orthodox Church is thus a family of
self-governing Churches. It is held together, not by
a centralized organization, not by a
single prelate wielding absolute power over the whole body,
but by the double bond of unity in the faith and communion in the sacraments. Each Church,
while independent, is in full agreement
with the rest on all matters of doctrine, and between them
all there is full sacramental communion.
(Certain divisions exist among the Russian Orthodox,
but the situation here is altogether
exceptional and, one hopes, temporary in character). There is
in Orthodoxy no one with an equivalent
position to the Pope in the Roman Catholic Church. The
Patriarch of Constantinople is known as the .Ecumenical. (or
universal) Patriarch, and since the
schism between east and west he has
enjoyed a position of special honor among all the Orthodox
communities; but he does not have the
right to interfere in the internal affairs of other Churches.
His place resembles that of the Archbishop
of Canterbury in the worldwide Anglican commun-
ion.
4
This decentralized system of independent local Churches has the
advantage of being highly
flexible, and is easily adapted to
changing conditions. Local Churches can be created, sup-
pressed, and then restored again, with
very little disturbance to the life of the Church as a whole.
Many of these local Churches are also
national Churches, for during the past in Orthodox coun-
tries Church and State have usually been closely linked.
But while an independent State often
possesses its own autocephalous Church, ecclesiastical divisions do not
necessarily coincide with
State boundaries. Georgia, for instance, lies within the U.S.S.R., but is not part of the
Russian
Church, while the territories of the four
ancient Patriarchates fall politically in several different
countries. The Orthodox Church is a
federation of local, but not in every
case national,
Churches. It does not have as its basis
the political principle of the State Church.
Among
the various Churches there is, as can be seen, an enormous variation in size,
with
Russia at one extreme and Sinai at the other.
The different Churches also vary in age, some dat-
ing back to Apostolic times, while others
are less than a generation old. The Church of Czecho-
slovakia, for example, only became autocephalous
in 1951.
Such are the Churches which make
up the Orthodox communion as it is
today. They are
known collectively by various titles. Sometimes they are called the
Greek
or Greco-Russian
Church; but this is incorrect, since there are
many millions of Orthodox who are neither Greek
nor Russian. Orthodox themselves often
call their Church the Eastern Orthodox Church, the Or-
thodox Catholic
Church, the Orthodox Catholic
Church of the East, or
the like. These titles must
not be misunderstood, for while Orthodoxy
considers itself to be the true Catholic Church, it is
not part of the Roman Catholic Church; and although Orthodoxy calls itself
eastern, it is not
something
limited to eastern
people. Another name
often employed is
the Holy Orthodox
Church. Perhaps it is least misleading and most
convenient to use the shortest title: the Orthodox
Church.
Orthodoxy claims to be universal . not something exotic and oriental,
but simple Christi-
anity. Because of human failings and the
accidents of history, the Orthodox
Church has been
largely restricted in the past to certain
geographical areas. Yet to the Orthodox themselves their
Church is something more than a group of
local bodies. The word .Orthodoxy. has the double
meaning of .right belief. and .right
glory. (or .right worship.). The Orthodox, therefore, make
what may seem at first a surprising claim:
they regard their Church as the Church which guards
and teaches the true belief about God
and which glorifies Him with right
worship, that is, as
nothing less than the Church of Christ on earth. How this claim is understood,
and what the Or-
thodox think of other Christians who do
not belong to their Church, it is part of the aim of this
book to explain.
|