bold = Main text
Part grey = Comment text
1 Text | Spanish - French 13.39~ ~ As a conclusion,
2 Refer| Novosibirsk ~: NGU, 1994-a. - 133 pages.~Tambovtsev, Yuri.
3 Refer| Nezavisimyj Institut,~2003. - 143 pages.~~~
4 Text | Spanish - Esperanto 6.15~ Spanish - Portuguese
5 Refer| Novosibirsk: NGU, 1994-b. - 199 pages. ~Tambovtsev, Yuri.
6 Text | are obtained: 1) labial; 2) front; 3) ~mediolingual
7 Text | Spanish - Rumanian 9.26~ Spanish - French
8 Text | Spanish - Italian 8.35~ Spanish - Rumanian
9 Text | Spanish - French 13.39~ ~ As a conclusion,
10 Text | palatal; 4) back or velar; 5) sonorant; 6) ~occlusive;
11 Text | Spanish - Rumanian 9.26~ Spanish -
12 Text | Spanish - Portuguese 7.91~ Spanish - Latin
13 Text | Spanish - Latin 7.98~ Spanish - Italian
14 | above
15 Text | b; 2003). It takes into account ~the frequency of occurrence
16 Text | according to the ~work of the active organ of speech or place
17 | Actually
18 Text | are usually different. The articulartory features ~may serve as the
19 | away
20 Text | mediolingual or palatal; 4) back or velar; 5) sonorant; 6) ~
21 Text | point out that ~consonants bear the semantic load in the
22 Text | Text~ Spanish is said to belong to the group of Romanic
23 | Besides
24 | between
25 | but
26 Text | undergone so ~many phonetic changes. It is logical that Spanish
27 Text | languages. On the basis of the "chi-~square" test and Euclidean
28 Text | because they ~were in the closest contact for many years. ~
29 Text | therefore, that it is not a coincidence that Portuguese, Italian ~
30 Text | keep to the ~principle of commensurability. Having it in mind, it is
31 Text | language sound picture. Having compared Spanish to some ~languages,
32 Text | speech sound chain. ~While comparing languages, it is necessary
33 Text | 13.39~ ~ As a conclusion, we can state that speech
34 Text | Spanish vowels will not be considered ~till the second stage of
35 Text | frequency of occurrence of the 8 consonantal groups ~mentioned above
36 Text | they ~were in the closest contact for many years. ~
37 Text | to the work of the vocal cords (1 feature: voiced). In ~
38 Text | Romanic languages. ~Our data state that the speech sound
39 Text | Euclidean distance, we have developed our own ~method of measuring
40 Refer| References:~Tambovtsev, Yuri. Dinamika funktsionorovanija fonem
41 Text | square" test and Euclidean distance, we have developed our own ~
42 Text | Spanish and French are ~distant from each other by the phonostatistical
43 Text | we fail to ~recognise and distinguish two languages, then we resort
44 Text | speech sound chain. It can be distinguished by its ~structure from any
45 Text | that Spanish consonants are distributed more ~similar to Portuguese,
46 Text | its phonemic ~chain. The distribution of Spanish vowels will not
47 Text | has a unique ~structure of distributions of speech sounds in its
48 | does
49 | each
50 Text | the "chi-~square" test and Euclidean distance, we have developed
51 | Every
52 Text | similar to Esperanto. One can explain it by ~the fact that Esperanto
53 Text | by vowels. However, if we fail to ~recognise and distinguish
54 Text | languages ~of Indo-European family. Besides Spanish, Romanic
55 Text | roots. Spanish is rather far away from the language ~
56 Text | work of the vocal cords (1 feature: voiced). In ~this way,
57 | First
58 Text | languages, we received the following phono-typological ~distances:~
59 Text | all the Romanic languages, gave all ~Romanic languages but
60 Text | from the language ~which is geographically close, i.e. French, which
61 Text | occurrence of the 8 consonantal groups ~mentioned above to measure
62 Refer| kompaktnost' podgrupp, grupp, semej i drugih ~jazykovyh
63 | have
64 | However
65 Text | Spanish, as any other human language, has a specific
66 Text | is geographically close, i.e. French, which undergone
67 | if
68 Text | Spanish, Romanic group ~includes Portuguese, French, Italian,
69 Text | of Romanic languages ~of Indo-European family. Besides Spanish,
70 Refer| fonem v zvukovoj ~tsepochke indoevropejskih, paleoaziatskih, uralo-altajskih
71 Refer| Novosibirsk: Sibirskij Nezavisimyj Institut,~2003. - 143 pages.~~~
72 | into
73 Text | the second stage of the investigation. Let's point out that ~consonants
74 Refer| uporjadochennosti zvukovyh ~tsepej v jazyke. - Novosibirsk: NGU, 1994-
75 Refer| grupp, semej i drugih ~jazykovyh taksonov. - Novosibirsk:
76 Text | languages, it is necessary to keep to the ~principle of commensurability.
77 Refer| i ~drugih jazykov mira: kompaktnost' podgrupp, grupp, semej
78 | less
79 | Let
80 Text | consonants bear the semantic load in the word, not vowels. ~
81 Text | phonetic changes. It is logical that Spanish and French
82 Text | the point of view of the manner of ~articulation or the
83 Text | articulartory features ~may serve as the basic features
84 Text | possible to understand the meaning of the ~message by consonants,
85 Text | groups ~mentioned above to measure the overwhelming mosaic
86 Text | developed our own ~method of measuring the phono-typological distances
87 Text | 1) labial; 2) front; 3) ~mediolingual or palatal; 4) back or velar;
88 Text | the 8 consonantal groups ~mentioned above to measure the overwhelming
89 Text | understand the meaning of the ~message by consonants, rather by
90 Text | have developed our own ~method of measuring the phono-typological
91 Text | commensurability. Having it in mind, it is not ~possible to
92 Text | Moldavian and ~some other minor Romanic languages. ~Spanish,
93 Refer| uralo-altajskih i ~drugih jazykov mira: kompaktnost' podgrupp,
94 Text | French, Italian, Rumanian, Moldavian and ~some other minor Romanic
95 Text | measure the overwhelming mosaic of the ~language sound picture.
96 | most
97 | must
98 Text | comparing languages, it is necessary to keep to the ~principle
99 Refer| Novosibirsk: Sibirskij Nezavisimyj Institut,~2003. - 143 pages.~~~
100 | no
101 Text | articulation or the type of the obstruction (3 features: sonorant, ~
102 Text | way, 8 basic features are obtained: 1) labial; 2) front; 3) ~
103 Text | the ~work of the active organ of speech or place of articulation (
104 Text | mentioned above to measure the overwhelming mosaic of the ~language
105 | own
106 Refer| tsepochke indoevropejskih, paleoaziatskih, uralo-altajskih i ~drugih
107 Text | of speech sounds in its phonemic ~chain. The distribution
108 Text | which undergone so ~many phonetic changes. It is logical that
109 Text | distant from each other by the phonostatistical point of view. In ~fact,
110 Text | active organ of speech or place of articulation (4 ~features:
111 Refer| jazykov mira: kompaktnost' podgrupp, grupp, semej i drugih ~
112 Text | necessary to keep to the ~principle of commensurability. Having
113 Refer| zvukovyh tsepochkah jazykov razlichnogo stroja. - Novosibirsk ~:
114 Text | features in phono-typological reasoning. ~First of all, it is the
115 Text | Spanish to some ~languages, we received the following phono-typological ~
116 Text | However, if we fail to ~recognise and distinguish two languages,
117 Refer| References:~Tambovtsev, Yuri. Dinamika
118 Text | of Spanish more or ~less resembles that of the other Romanic
119 Text | distinguish two languages, then we resort to the ~structure of occurrence
120 Text | Spanish, than Spanish to the rest of the Romanic languages. ~
121 Text | Portuguese, Italian ~and Romanian are more similar to Spanish
122 | s
123 Text | Text~ Spanish is said to belong to the group of
124 | same
125 Text | be considered ~till the second stage of the investigation.
126 Text | front, palatal, and velar). Secondly, it is the ~classification
127 Text | that ~consonants bear the semantic load in the word, not vowels. ~
128 Refer| kompaktnost' podgrupp, grupp, semej i drugih ~jazykovyh taksonov. -
129 Text | frequency of ~occurrence of separate phonemes, because the sets
130 Text | articulartory features ~may serve as the basic features in
131 Text | separate phonemes, because the sets of phonemes ~in languages
132 | should
133 Refer| taksonov. - Novosibirsk: Sibirskij Nezavisimyj Institut,~2003. -
134 | so
135 Text | distributions of speech sounds in its phonemic ~chain.
136 Text | other human language, has a specific structure ~of the speech
137 Text | On the basis of the "chi-~square" test and Euclidean distance,
138 Text | considered ~till the second stage of the investigation. Let'
139 Refer| tsepochkah jazykov razlichnogo stroja. - Novosibirsk ~: NGU, 1994-
140 Text | languages but French its sound system. We must point ~out, therefore,
141 Text | consonants. One should ~take the values of the frequency
142 Text | 1994-a; 1994-b; 2003). It takes into account ~the frequency
143 Refer| semej i drugih ~jazykovyh taksonov. - Novosibirsk: Sibirskij
144 Text | basis of the "chi-~square" test and Euclidean distance,
145 Text | Text~ Spanish is said to belong
146 | them
147 | then
148 | these
149 | they
150 Text | occlusive and fricative). Thirdly, it is the classification ~
151 | this
152 | those
153 | thus
154 Text | will not be considered ~till the second stage of the
155 Refer| uporjadochennosti zvukovyh ~tsepej v jazyke. - Novosibirsk:
156 Refer| funktsionorovanija fonem v ~zvukovyh tsepochkah jazykov razlichnogo stroja. -
157 Refer| funktsionorovanija fonem v zvukovoj ~tsepochke indoevropejskih, paleoaziatskih,
158 Text | recognise and distinguish two languages, then we resort
159 Text | of ~articulation or the type of the obstruction (3 features:
160 Text | close, i.e. French, which undergone so ~many phonetic changes.
161 Text | it is more possible to understand the meaning of the ~message
162 Text | language. Every language has a unique ~structure of distributions
163 Refer| Tambovtsev, Yuri. Tipologija uporjadochennosti zvukovyh ~tsepej v jazyke. -
164 Refer| indoevropejskih, paleoaziatskih, uralo-altajskih i ~drugih jazykov mira:
165 | us
166 Text | phonemes ~in languages are usually different. The articulartory
167 Text | consonants. One should ~take the values of the frequency of occurrence
168 Text | according to the work of the vocal cords (1 feature: voiced).
169 | was
170 | were
171 | While
172 | will
173 Text | the semantic load in the word, not vowels. ~Therefore,
174 Text | closest contact for many years. ~
175 Refer| funktsionorovanija fonem v zvukovoj ~tsepochke indoevropejskih,
|