Table of Contents | Words: Alphabetical - Frequency - Inverse - Length - Statistics | Help | IntraText Library
Alphabetical    [«  »]
bias 1
biased 1
bib 1
bible 104
bible-believing 2
biblical 79
bibliography 1
Frequency    [«  »]
107 such
105 christianity
105 created
104 bible
102 after
101 some
99 being
Ivan M. Andreyev
Orthodox apologetic theology

IntraText - Concordances

bible

    Chapter,  Paragraph
1 1 | worship. In general, the Bible concerned itself very little 2 1 | knowledge and all theology; the Bible, forgotten in the Middle 3 1 | and interpretation of the Bible, not guarded by the guidance 4 3 | adding data to expand on the Bible’s information, scientific 5 8 | not have a beginning. The Bible says, “In the beginning 6 8 | or was it not caused? The Bible states, “In the beginning 7 8 | earth.” Not only does the Bible maintain that there was 8 8 | existing is also incorrect The Bible's assertion that there was 9 8 | what was the cause? The Bible tells us that God was the 10 10,5 | prophet, but reject the Bible’s claim that God’s blessing 11 10,6 | accept the Tanach (the Hebrew Bible, which Christians call the 12 14 | conclusion, not based on the Bible, because being in the focus 13 15 | concentrated, are described in the Bible with an accuracy which is 14 15 | believing people who honor the Bible among learned, world-renowned 15 15,1 | existence of its Creator. The Bible in the book of Genesis gives 16 15,1 | attempting to discredit the Bible. But the young-earth arguments 17 15,1 | modern science with the Bible.~ ~ 18 15,2 | century, science and the Bible coexisted relatively comfortably.~ 19 15,2 | older than the traditional Bible creation dates allowed. 20 15,3 | creation appears in the Bible long before the creation 21 15,3 | overcoming inert matter. The Bible is unlike the Vedanta, and 22 15,5 | always thought that the Bible is the inspired and unerring 23 15,5 | interpretation of a passage.~The Bible is God's book of words, 24 15,5 | book of works. Since the Bible and the creation are both 25 15,5 | attempt to understand the Bible. Science is man's attempt 26 15,5 | become fully revealed the Bible and the creation record 27 15,5 | at the beginning of the Bible is literally true. Usually 28 15,5 | belief in the God of the Bible.~MicroevolutionEvolution 29 15,6 | What the Bible Says About Evolution.~Since 30 15,6 | that it is not against the Bible to admit that the earth 31 15,6 | translating of the King James Bible. If this is a correct understanding 32 15,6 | originally reptiles. The Bible says they were created after 33 15,6 | science agrees with the Bible — again.~Doesn't this diminish 34 15,6 | destroy long held views. The Bible is literally true. It is 35 15,6 | people who have rejected the Bible and Jesus because of the 36 15,6 | variety. Isn't this what the Bible tells us that God did on 37 15,6 | sixth day?~Science and the Bible are once again in complete 38 15,7 | created man. Whenever the Bible makes a statement 3 times, 39 15,8 | intellectual pursuits. The Bible instructs us to test everything 40 15,8 | thousands of years ago, the Bible continues to be true and 41 15,8 | be true and relevant. The Bible's ability to convey truth 42 15,8 | not to be worshipped. The Bible is to be read, studied and 43 15,8 | life of the believer. The Bible is the Holy Scripture, but 44 15,8 | creation presented in the Bible fits very nicely with current 45 15,8 | understanding of the beginnings. The Bible sets some specific limits, 46 15,8 | is known to be true. The Bible offers an explanation beyond 47 15,8 | choose to believe that the Bible reveals the truths that 48 15,9 | direct opposition to the Bible. Second, the Scripture says 49 15,9 | choices, we can believe the Bible or we can believe science. 50 15,9 | must compromise either the Bible or science.~Biologists have 51 15,9 | quick to state that the Bible is not a science book. So 52 15,9 | natural cause reality.~The Bible is a collection of books 53 15,9 | image through the cross. The Bible also mentions some scientific 54 15,9 | of extra dimensions. The Bible should be taken seriously, 55 15,9 | provides for us, how can the Bible say God rested from His 56 15,9 | our fear convince us the Bible says something that it does 57 15,2 | marine life, how can the Bible really be the word of God? 58 15,2 | sedimentary rocks to form. The Bible says life began as soon 59 15,2 | this group, and yet the Bible lists them all simply as, “ 60 15,5 | whose description in the Bible and in the pages of any 61 15,5 | stated in the text of the Bible that the Lord gives an order 62 15,5 | understanding of many places of the Bible have contributed not a little 63 15,5 | world to realize that the Bible gives no support to understanding 64 15,6 | He breathes the soul. The Bible does not discuss any span 65 15,6 | not find the answer in the Bible because in the Bible, the 66 15,6 | the Bible because in the Bible, the earth is everything 67 15,6 | Church fathers, and even the Bible itself hold that all the 68 16,2 | vinced that the words of the Bible and scientific data are 69 16,2 | understand the facts in the Bible. But in other respects these 70 16,2 | of a single page of the Bible; hence it is already clear, 71 18,1 | with bad ambitions. The Bible’s explanation for this is 72 19 | the Flood mentioned in the Bible geographically universal? 73 19 | and South of Russia. The Bible repeatedly states that the 74 19,1 | extent of the Flood.~ The Bible gives the following brief 75 19,1 | which is more specific. The Bible is very specific about the 76 19,1 | science and the words of the Bible. Rather, we have one more 77 19,1 | objective evidence that the Bible is indeed unerring.~ Does 78 19,1 | Geology and the Flood,” in New Bible Dictionary, 2d ed., eds. 79 19,2 | Genesis. The closest to the Bible is the Babylonian report. 80 19,2 | Pacific Northwest).~One Bible scholar correctly observed 81 19,4 | These texts shows that the Bible urges the historicity of 82 App,1| actual events recorded in the Bible. Archaeology has therefore 83 App,1| historical accuracy of the Bible. It has verified many ancient 84 App,1| supported the facts of the Bible.~ Second, archaeology helps 85 App,1| our understanding of the Bible. Although we do not have 86 App,1| helps illustrate and explain Bible passages. The events of 87 App,1| passages. The events of the Bible occurred at a certain time, 88 App,1| topics not covered in the Bible. Much of what we know of 89 App,1| both archaeology and the Bible, but it is unwarranted to 90 App,1| canonical scriptures.” The Bible has proven to be an accurate 91 App,1| historical statements in the Bible.”~ ~The Discovery of the 92 App,1| the Hittites outside the Bible, and many critics alleged 93 App,1| biblical historicity.~ Now the Bible picture of this people fits 94 App,1| However, throughout the Bible this story is treated as 95 App,1| rebuild. According to the Bible, four of the five cities 96 App,1| Jericho~ According to the Bible, the conquest of Jericho 97 App,1| archeological evidence supports the Bible's account of when and how 98 App,1| beloved characters in the Bible is King David. Scripture 99 App,1| no evidence outside the Bible attested to his existence. 100 App,1| David found outside of the Bible. This discovery has caused 101 App,1| the Arameans, which the Bible refers to during this period. 102 App,1| political entities as the Bible describes. Critics long 103 App,1| many of the accounts in the Bible. . . . Many scholars have 104 App,1| Interpreter's Dictionary of the Bible, 1989, Vol. 3, p. 813).~


Best viewed with any browser at 800x600 or 768x1024 on Tablet PC
IntraText® (V89) - Some rights reserved by EuloTech SRL - 1996-2007. Content in this page is licensed under a Creative Commons License