Chapter,  Paragraph

 1 1   |            little with questions of proof of the existence of God
 2 1   |             a so-called ontological proof of the existence of God
 3 1   |         connection with ontological proof of the existence of God.~
 4 1   |             presented philosophical proof of the existence of God,
 5 1   |           then proposed his own new proof (a special form of ethical
 6 1   |             special form of ethical proof of the trust of the existence
 7 2   |            aid of faith. Where such proof is possible, faith is unnecessary.
 8 3   |             to say that no external proof of the existence of God
 9 3   |             man the most convincing proof of the existence of God.
10 5   |      problem of an exact, objective proof of phenomena investigated
11 7   |            the so-called historical proof of the truth of the existence
12 8   |           of the possibility of the proof of the existence of God,
13 8   |             understanding about the proof itself.~For example, according
14 8   |            does make impossible the proof of God’s objectively perceptible
15 8   |        denial of the possibility of proof of the existence of God
16 8   |             of the substance of the proof itself. For instance, some
17 8   |          investigators have defined proof as a conclusion from the
18 8   |        nothing higher than God, the proof of the existence of God
19 8   |         incorrect definition of the proof. The proof of the existence
20 8   |        definition of the proof. The proof of the existence of God
21 8   |   possibility of exact mathematical proof of religious truths, which
22 8   |    scientific, mathematically exact proof of the existence of God
23 8   |           form of so-called ethical proof. The history of philosophy
24 8   |           instance, the ontological proof of the existence of God,
25 8   |        critique does not refute the proof of the existence of God,
26 8   |           his so-called ontological proof of the truth of the existence
27 8   |          fundamental and convincing proof of the existence of God
28 8   |         simultaneously, so also the proof of the truth of God’s existence
29 8   |       rarely mentions the so-called proof of God’s existence, regarding
30 8   |           of God.~ ~A. Cosmological Proof.~1. Cosmological proof of
31 8   | Cosmological Proof.~1. Cosmological proof of the existence of God
32 8   |            the Church, cosmological proof of God’s existence is presented
33 8   |             defense of cosmological proof are met in Aristotle (as
34 8   |   Prime-mover). Leibnitz forms this proof by a conclusion, not from
35 8   |         indispensable.~Cosmological proof usually rests on two laws
36 8   |          The main objection to this proof was that we do not have
37 8   |             vindicates cosmological proof to a sufficient degree.
38 8   |             a singularity! A second proof is seen in the energy sources
39 8   |       beginning!~A third scientific proof that the atheist is wrong
40 8   |         point out that cosmological proof does not demonstrate a personal
41 8   |            is correct. Cosmological proof makes no pretence to this.
42 8   |        existence.~ ~B. Teleological Proof.~The teleological proof
43 8   |             Proof.~The teleological proof of the existence of God,
44 8   |         expedience. If cosmological proof concentrates on the investigation
45 8   |     universe, then the teleological proof interests itself chiefly
46 8   |            expedience.~Cosmological proof demands recognition of God
47 8   |             world; the teleological proof demands the recognition
48 8   |            each other. Teleological proof is not greater than the
49 8   |       pointed out, the teleological proof does not prove the Creator
50 8   |       synthesis can be inferred the proof of God as an Absolute Personality.
51 8   |         recognized the teleological proof as one of the strongest
52 8   |           however, the teleological proof is regarded as chiefly biblical,
53 8   |             of the world as graphic proof of the wisdom of the Creator.
54 8   |          godly wisdom.~Teleological proof can be divided into two
55 8   |     Objections against teleological proof usually take one of three
56 8   |              Historico-teleological proof of the existence of an Intellect-God
57 8   |             is more debatable. This proof, leading to an understanding
58 8   |         whom it is accessible, this proof is exceptionally convincing.~ ~
59 8   |        convincing.~ ~C. Ontological Proof.~Ontological and ethical
60 8   |             experience.~Ontological proof of the existence of God
61 8   |      Canterbury. The author of this proof regards it not as a fruit
62 8   |           The basic thought of this proof is that in the inherent
63 8   |      all-perfect Being. Ontological proof was also defended by Leibniz
64 8   |         considerations. Ontological proof does not at all assert that
65 8   |          Therefore, the ontological proof can be finally formulated
66 8   |           actual fact.~ ~D. Ethical Proof.~Ethical proof of God’s
67 8   |              Ethical Proof.~Ethical proof of God’s existence can be
68 8   |       character. Practical, ethical proof results in pointing to the
69 8   |      philosophic methods of ethical proof of God’s existence come
70 8   |             and philosophy, ethical proof of God’s existence was deduced
71 8   |            Kant gave to the ethical proof a different basis. For harmony
72 8   |         pre-Kant and Kant), ethical proof has its force. These forms
73 8   |             Kant also expressed his proof in this fashion: “Nature
74 8   |         criticism of Kant’s ethical proof, with complete justice,
75 8   |             formulations of ethical proof of God’s existence, we can
76 8   |           above, is the theoretical proof of the existence of God,
77 9   |          peoples).~The teleological proof is drawn from the attributes
78 9   |                   The philosophical proof is inferred from the properties
79 9   |        itself.~·        The ethical proof is based on the demands
80 9   |             soul.~The philosophical proof of immortality complements
81 9   |        changing matter.~The ethical proof of the soul’s immortality
82 11  |             Christian teaching as a proof of its divine origin. St.
83 11  |         about the Resurrection as a proof of the divine greatness
84 11  |       Therefore, the most important proof of the divine truth of Revelation
85 12  |            accompany Revelation are proof of Divine Almightiness,
86 12  |       Revelation. Prophecies, being proof of Divine Omniscience, also
87 12  |           the best and most graphic proof of the divinity of Revelation.~
88 12  |       Savior.~Not less of a notable proof of the truth of divine Revelation
89 12  |           Luke 24:27). The power of proof of Revelation by prophecies
90 15,3|     evidence of an ancient earth as proof and reduce Genesis to a
91 17,1|            others.” The one oblique proof of the correctness of biblical
92 22  |             But the most convincing proof — not to be doubted — of
93 23  |   personality of Christ is absolute proof of the reality of the Divinity
94 24  |         Christian Apologetics.” The proof of the truth of the Resurrection
95 24  |           and very convincing. This proof comes to the conclusion