Chapter,  Paragraph

 1 1    |             existence of God since in biblical times very few doubted the
 2 1    |           denying the authenticity of biblical books and scriptural miracles,
 3 3    |            the spread of atheism. The Biblical narrative about the origins
 4 8    |             scientifically wrong. The biblical assertion that there was
 5 8    |          proof is regarded as chiefly biblical, as the Holy Scripture often
 6 10,3 |              unrealistic according to Biblical teaching, since none can
 7 10,4 |          enlightenment.~Viewed from a Biblical perspective, Hindu believers
 8 13   |           welfare of the race of man.~Biblical monotheism differs sharply
 9 13   |               also as the Intellect), biblical monotheism sharply differs
10 13   |             of beings created by Him.~Biblical monotheism bears a deeply
11 13   |            universe, according to the biblical teaching, is also the all-good
12 13   | interpretation have proved powerless.~Biblical teaching about creation
13 13   |        closely dependent on the lofty biblical teaching about the Creator
14 13   |             Mediterranean world).~The biblical solution to the question
15 14   |        ironical, above all, about the Biblical narration on the creation
16 15   |                               15. The biblical teaching on creation.~The
17 15   |             teaching on creation.~The biblical teaching about creation
18 15   |           formation of the world. The biblical narration of the creation
19 15   |          serious naturalists.~ In the biblical narration, the creation
20 15   |               the conviction that the biblical teaching about creation,
21 15   |           that is more lofty than the biblical teaching of creation.” An
22 15,6 |             than the 6,000 years. The Biblical case for an old earth has
23 15,6 |              the old understanding of Biblical creation, yet that is what
24 15,6 |                God is in control. The Biblical account of creation is literal,
25 15,9 |             claimed to be of the same Biblical kind as the original organism:
26 15,9 |             solution here is that the Biblical kind is synonymous with
27 15,0 |                                       Biblical Limitations.~The subject
28 15,0 |           Limitations.~The subject of Biblical kinds has caused much division.
29 15,1 |             does a horse. This is the Biblical difference that separates
30 15,2 |                it is design! From the Biblical point of view it may be
31 15,5 |               does not contradict the biblical teaching on the creation
32 15,5 |             degree of similarity. The biblical terminology itself fits
33 15,5 |         Zenkovsky also emphasized the biblical “creative potential” of
34 15,5 |               It sufficed to read the biblical account of the creation
35 15,5 |       intervals, and the wall between biblical accounts and scientific
36 15,6 |               the word “earth” in the biblical story of the creation of
37 15,6 |           summarize this section, the biblical teaching about man affirms
38 16   |             to doubt the truth of the biblical teaching of the origin of
39 16,2 |           paleontology to support the Biblical account. In principle we
40 17,1 |            primary state of man.~ The biblical teaching about the primitive
41 17,1 |           proof of the correctness of biblical teaching in this question
42 17,1 |              etc. In other words, the biblical teaching about the primitive
43 17,1 |               loss through the Fall.~ Biblical teaching about the primitive
44 17,2 |           conception of sin stems the biblical teaching of the extreme
45 19   |              The universal flood.~The Biblical teaching about the Flood (
46 19,1 |              9:1-27).~ A good rule of Biblical interpretation is to analyze
47 19,1 |             regions near Mesopotamia.~Biblical clues to the geographical
48 19,1 |           them, but not as global:~ ~ Biblical phrases such as “under the
49 19,2 |                The historicity of the Biblical flood account is confirmed
50 19,2 |           opinion, independent of the Biblical account. R. Andree (Die
51 19,3 |             uninformed reading of the Biblical text. Genesis 8:4 reports
52 20   |                                   20. Biblical teaching on redemption.~
53 20   |              in the light of revealed biblical teaching. The amazing phenomenon
54 20   |               any religion except the biblical one — is the teaching about
55 21,1 |               Old Testament religion. Biblical opinion of man as an image
56 App,1|        therefore played a key role in biblical studies and Christian apologetics
57 App,1|             sites, civilizations, and biblical characters whose existence
58 App,1|             often dismissed as myths. Biblical archaeology has silenced
59 App,1|               the nuances and uses of biblical words as they were used
60 App,1|            ever controverted a single biblical reference. Scores of archeological
61 App,1|         history. They interacted with biblical figures as early as Abraham
62 App,1|              were an invention of the biblical authors.~ In 1876 a dramatic
63 App,1|        discovery also confirmed other biblical facts. Five temples were
64 App,1|             of this find in regard to biblical historicity.~ Now the Bible
65 App,1|               any way discredited the Biblical account. Scripture accuracy
66 App,1|             has helped to confirm the biblical narrative and had a great
67 App,1|             this city with one of the biblical “Cities of the Plains,”
68 App,1|           destruction would match the biblical account that the city was
69 App,1|           site of Bab edh-Drha is the biblical city of Sodom”{5}.~ Five
70 App,1|               archaeology support the biblical account? Over the past century
71 App,1|          damming of the Jordan in the biblical account, caused this collapse.
72 App,1|             again consistent with the biblical account that the city was
73 App,1|        conquest. Garstang held to the biblical date of 1400 B.C. while
74 App,1|          Kings. Dr. Hershel Shanks of Biblical Archaeological Review states, “
75 App,1|              stele brings to life the biblical text in a very dramatic
76 App,1|             historical reality of the biblical text.”~ The find has confirmed
77 App,1|          scholars, archaeologists and biblical scholars would take a very
78 App,1|              of the Caiaphas Family,” Biblical Archaeological Review, September-October
79 App,1|             Inscribed on Bone Boxes,” Biblical Archaeological Review, September-October