Chapter,  Paragraph

 1 1    |             consequence of the high moral basis of the new teaching.
 2 2    |          know,” and does not make a moral or spiritual effort of the
 3 2    |              the origin of evil, or moral law.~Deism, denying the
 4 2    |             either in intellect, in moral philosophy or in will (wicked
 5 3    |             principles of faith and moral in the open. Not many youths
 6 3    |    pleasures. Once there is no God, moral law is relative and man
 7 3    |          than a man without supreme moral guidance. A man like that
 8 3    |           obliges him to change his moral life and to learn to sacrifice
 9 4    |             religious feeling and a moral feeling may be understood
10 4    |      satisfaction of the demands of moral duty and a longing for ethical
11 4    |           condition of this life is moral activity possible. Only
12 7    |          higher, blissful means for moral growth and genuine ethical
13 8    |       following manner.~The fear of moral responsibility before God
14 8    |             man not when he lives a moral life, but only when he performs
15 8    |    unethical actions, transgressing moral law, given to us from God,
16 8    |            be put into life without moral effort and grace sent from
17 8    |        conclusion. The existence of moral law concluding in a demand
18 8    |          concluding in a demand for moral good, which already in itself
19 10   |             prominent in mental and moral qualities openly acknowledged
20 12   |     definite aim, sense, and a deep moral meaning: revealing to people
21 13   |        possessing a completeness of moral force. There was a complete
22 13   |             also in the irreligious moral system of Buddhism!~Only
23 13   |       capable of the development of moral likeness to God and designated
24 15,7 |             believe; to distinguish moral evil from moral good; to
25 15,7 |         distinguish moral evil from moral good; to create art; to
26 15,7 |           with intellect and a high moral standard. The question remains,
27 15,6 |            his bodily and spiritual/moral nature, man is created in
28 15,6 |             the purest intellectual/moral personality. According to
29 16,2 |           obliged to strive towards moral purity and excellence, so
30 17,1 |       through personal, self-active moral strivings toward perfection,
31 17,2 |          the natural results of the moral fall, the falling away from
32 17,2 |             and itself the greatest moral evil!~ ~
33 17,3 |             animals do not have the moral capacity to sin, their death
34 18   |           There can be physical and moral good. Evil can also be classified
35 18   |          classified as physical and moral.~ ~
36 18,1 |                                     Moral good and moral evil.~ By
37 18,1 |                      Moral good and moral evil.~ By the experience,
38 18,1 |           to the depth of a human’s moral core. On the one hand, the
39 18,1 |             one’s own life from the moral viewpoint is natural. Things
40 18,1 |         protect, or save. Man feels moral satisfaction when he pleases
41 18,1 | predisposition for violation of the moral law, becomes a sinful habit,
42 18,1 |            taste. In a while, man’s moral condition starts to alter
43 18,2 |             the standpoint of man’s moral development, it can result
44 18,2 |           in good. On the contrary, moral evil, i.e. absolute evil,
45 18,3 |          God. From the viewpoint of moral development, a lot of things
46 18,3 |           This is not the case with moral evil. Often, evil things
47 18,3 |          the evildoing cripples the moral self of the transgressor
48 18,3 |         someone indirectly promotes moral good by doing moral evil.
49 18,3 |        promotes moral good by doing moral evil. For example, by making
50 18,3 |           result from the action of moral evil (torturer’s brutality).
51 18,3 |        faith and patience. However, moral evil as such always results
52 18,3 |        results in evil. That is why moral evil, as well as moral good,
53 18,3 |          why moral evil, as well as moral good, is an absolute concept.~ ~
54 18,4 |                                     Moral from the perspective of
55 18,4 |             Who is the Cause of the moral law can precisely know what
56 18,4 |           about God’s permitting of moral evil? Why does He allow
57 18,4 |             choice, there cannot be moral good, and only mechanical,
58 21   |        religion.~The essence of the moral world-view of the Old Testament
59 21   |          complete expression of the moral ideal in all its universal
60 21   |            of all, man is chiefly a moral being. Because of this,
61 21,1 |             encouragement of a good moral life of the Hebrew people (
62 23   |  astonishing, crystal purity of His moral personality ought to be
63 23   |           of Christ, and before our moral and intellectual glance
64 24   |            Christianity only to its moral principles, and 2) to represent
65 24   |         other religions only in its moral superiority over them. According
66 24   |         Christ is the ideal type of moral perfection. His precepts
67 24   |         Buddhism may be), since the moral teaching of Christ is found
68 24   |           add a higher authority to moral teaching. On the contrary,
69 24   |          development of man and his moral growth in the present temporal
70 24   |            meaning. It elevated the moral conscience of man to a height
71 App,1|          was created to communicate moral principles. However, throughout
72 App,2|             a living, real ideal of moral perfectibility. In other