Chapter,  Paragraph

 1 1    | achievements of honorable, worldly knowledge. In answer to the criticism
 2 1    |            to Clement, there is no knowledge without faith, and no faith
 3 1    |        faith, and no faith without knowledge. He contended for the indispensability
 4 1    |         internal bond of faith and knowledge.~Knowledge obedient to faith,
 5 1    |            of faith and knowledge.~Knowledge obedient to faith, and faith
 6 1    |          and faith strengthened by knowledge, both accompanying each
 7 1    |         accord between themselves. Knowledge succeeds faith; it does
 8 1    |         Christian theology through knowledge and philosophy, can be called
 9 1    |         ends with “The Fountain of Knowledge,” St. John of Damascus (
10 1    |           scientific-philosophical knowledge and true religious faith,
11 1    |       contrary, she always treated knowledge favorably. She maintained
12 1    |           main source of religious knowledge and all theology; the Bible,
13 1    |           which tried to reconcile knowledge and religion. The authority
14 2    |           limitation of scientific knowledge and rational method.~Positivism
15 2    |       conglomeration of scientific knowledge suitable only for the satisfaction
16 2    |          revealed!~Only when one’s knowledge is merely a superficial
17 2    |            is merely a superficial knowledge (which, in the words of
18 2    |   contradictions between faith and knowledge, between religion and science.
19 2    |          with a deeply penetrating knowledge (which, again according
20 3    |            rare bird. It is common knowledge that since pre-historic
21 3    |         conflict between faith and knowledge. Sometimes, teachers or
22 3    |    students’ parents need a lot of knowledge and skill to save their
23 5    |          pseudo-science.~Faith and knowledge in their very essence are
24 5    |           least, in his intellect.~Knowledge is as necessary and lawful
25 5    |         can be indispensable where knowledge is inadequate and helpless.
26 5    |         into contradiction without knowledge. True, a contradiction is
27 5    |   contradictions between faith and knowledge and between religion and
28 5    |         the objective of religion. Knowledge of the chemical composition
29 5    |         composition of a rock, and knowledge of the meaning and aim of
30 5    |        more it nurtures a love for knowledge; not, of course, vain knowledge,
31 5    |    knowledge; not, of course, vain knowledge, but true knowledge, which
32 5    |           vain knowledge, but true knowledge, which is called spiritual
33 5    |     relationship between faith and knowledge, St. Basil the Great also
34 5    |          In science faith precedes knowledge.” This is profoundly true,
35 5    |          and initial in scientific knowledge is impossible to prove and
36 5    |         scientific and philosophic knowledge with such deep respect,
37 5    |         esteem and reverence. True knowledge is incompatible with pride.
38 8    |            science “faith precedes knowledge.” Everything that is most
39 8    |           elementary in scientific knowledge is unprovable and is accepted
40 8    |         not yet give us scientific knowledge), but also of speculative
41 8    |     Secondly, besides exactness of knowledge, one must discern also its
42 8    |         its value and meaning. The knowledge of the chemical composition
43 8    |           the scientific method of knowledge, and, therefore, the boundaries
44 8    |   empirical science for man.~Where knowledge is helpless, faith is lawful.
45 8    |   disproved by means of scientific knowledge, is perfectly lawful.~The
46 8    |    question is unsolvable by exact knowledge and is subject only to faith,
47 10   |      spirit, man can have definite knowledge of God, of the world, and
48 10   |          in his mind and an inborn knowledge of the Divine Will in his
49 10   |        realizing the limits of his knowledge and, by a spiritual renunciation,
50 10,1 |         worthy through good works, knowledge, or devotion. The Muslim
51 10,4 |        their own hands, or through knowledge in a manner similar to Buddhism'
52 10,4 |           his works, devotion, and knowledge to be counted in place of
53 11   |          and capabilities of man’s knowledge.~The revelation of nature
54 11   |          In such a teaching, man’s knowledge of God is, in essence, a
55 11   |           of God is, in essence, a knowledge of God about Himself.~In
56 14   |            by the baggage of their knowledge. That is why we cannot demand
57 15,4 |             But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt
58 15,5 |          interpreted by man, whose knowledge is always incomplete.~When
59 15,8 |          to be very effective. Our knowledge and technology have greatly
60 15,9 |         equipped to deal with this knowledge. The reason is twofold.
61 17,1 |          the fruits of the tree of knowledge of good and evil, created
62 21   |        Testament Scripture is this knowledge of the necessity for the
63 24   |          abstract system of higher knowledge, as an abstract philosophy
64 24   |            hostility to intellect, knowledge, and all progress: social,
65 24   |       genuine science, and genuine knowledge. But Christianity has never
66 24   |            to life, and encourages knowledge which serves as a weapon
67 25   |            God.~ We be firm in our knowledge that God is infinitely good
68 App,2|       without any preparation. His knowledge did not appear to be borrowed