Chapter,  Paragraph

 1 1   |         early as other delusions (scientific, philosophic, political,
 2 1   |         need to turn to so-called scientific and philosophical proofs
 3 1   |           were not in need of any scientific and philosophical structures
 4 1   |         impartial, historical and scientific testimony of representatives
 5 1   |     receptive to all sorts of new scientific influences and, as a result
 6 1   |            assisted the work of a scientific defense of Christianity.
 7 1   |          on the method of western scientific, theological Apologetics.
 8 1   |         concerned itself with the scientific basis for religious truths,
 9 1   |           of the application of a scientific method to theology (Kant,
10 2   |  recognition of the limitation of scientific knowledge and rational method.~
11 2   |          into a conglomeration of scientific knowledge suitable only
12 3   |        justify their disbelief by scientific or philosophical arguments.
13 3   |          the Bible’s information, scientific discoveries are set in opposition
14 3   |        are not based on objective scientific data, but on private opinions
15 3   |         be studied by any regular scientific methods, but the human soul,
16 5   |        fundamental and initial in scientific knowledge is impossible
17 5   |        the Church regarded honest scientific and philosophic knowledge
18 5   |          their turn, the greatest scientific scholars regarded religious
19 5   |        phenomena in an attempt to scientific enlightenment. It is without
20 5   |       lawfully revealed through a scientific method of verification.
21 5   |           explained merely from a scientific point of view. The philosophical
22 7   |           not contradicted by the scientific data of psychology, anthropology,
23 7   |         the other sciences, since scientific conclusions have only a
24 8   |          theoretical and strictly scientific proofs of the existence
25 8   |           basic and elementary in scientific knowledge is unprovable
26 8   |          which do not yet give us scientific knowledge), but also of
27 8   |      shows only the limits of the scientific method of knowledge, and,
28 8   |          be disproved by means of scientific knowledge, is perfectly
29 8   |            the impossibility of a scientific, mathematically exact proof
30 8   | mathematically exact character of scientific proofs.~In regard to the
31 8   |         philosophical and even in scientific controversy, we often meet
32 8   |          had a beginning!~A third scientific proof that the atheist is
33 8   |        out of nothing, all of our scientific laws dealing with the conservation
34 8   |         strongly by the available scientific evidence.~ ~4. The Design.~
35 9,1 |       confirms in an unbiased and scientific way the truth of the soul'
36 10,2|   observation, even with the best scientific equipment. So couldn't the
37 13  |           in any philosophical or scientific teaching. Man lives amid
38 14  |    opinions of scientists have no scientific facts supporting them; they
39 14  |           to learn about positive scientific discoveries in the fields
40 14  |       able to distinguish precise scientific facts from suggestions and
41 14  |      Facts will remain facts, but scientific theories built upon them
42 15,1|         4004 BC. Usher had little scientific data available to determine
43 15,3|            Understanding Genesis.~Scientific investigation has repeatedly
44 15,5|           spec: the doctrine that scientific laws are adequate to account
45 15,6|          understanding of current scientific theory and, if correct,
46 15,8|          very nicely with current scientific understanding of the beginnings.
47 15,8|           to remain secure in his scientific comfort zone with this statement.
48 15,9|           So why do they expect a scientific explanation for kind? If
49 15,9|         own view of reality — the scientific natural cause reality.~The
50 15,9|          Bible also mentions some scientific concepts, such as the beginning
51 15,4|         was once laughable in the scientific community. Over the past
52 15,4|          that the recent trend in scientific thought has gone too far.
53 15,4|         draw on a wide variety of scientific disciplines, from geology
54 15,5|     between biblical accounts and scientific data on the indefinitely
55 16  |    possible, or not? There are no scientific data forcing us to doubt
56 16,2|        the words of the Bible and scientific data are not in contradiction,
57 16,2|        clear to us. In some cases scientific data can show us how we
58 17,3|         death came with creation. Scientific evidence shows one that
59 17,3|         This view is supported by scientific evidence.~ ~ ~
60 19  |         data — both Scripture and scientific — we lean toward the second
61 19,1|           global flood. No viable scientific evidence has ever been found
62 19,2|           the best stab at modern scientific corroboration of the Flood
63 24  |         and all progress: social, scientific, political, economic, etc.