Chapter,  Paragraph

 1 8    |           the available scientific evidence.~ ~4. The Design.~If we
 2 10,4 |     Judeo-Christian belief and the evidence supports it. The universe
 3 15,1 |            if he were to study the evidence available now. However,
 4 15,3 |           has repeatedly uncovered evidence of an ancient earth. The
 5 15,3 |       earth creationists claim the evidence is being misrepresented
 6 15,3 |   rejecting science, or accept the evidence of an ancient earth as proof
 7 15,3 |          read literally, while the evidence of an ancient earth will
 8 15,4 |                         Scriptural evidence for long “days.”~In the
 9 15,6 |          If one throws out all the evidence for an old earth, Let the
10 15,6 |           But when one accepts the evidence of cosmology, geology, paleontology
11 15,8 |                       The physical evidence — in agreement with scripture.~
12 15,8 |         truth when compared to the evidence of nature is, well, supernatural.
13 15,8 |      natural means. You can't find evidence of God if you exclude Him
14 15,8 |           explanation based on the evidence. This method has proven
15 15,8 |    theories are tested against the evidence, science is fluid, changing
16 15,8 |      naturalistic best fit for the evidence.~Evolution defined as “change
17 15,8 |             It is suggested by the evidence but not observed so; while
18 15,8 |           chooses to interpret the evidence in a certain manner. This
19 15,8 |          beyond naturalism for the evidence. We may willfully choose
20 15,8 |          unavailable from physical evidence.~ ~Now let's begin our look
21 15,8 |           our look at the physical evidence:~ ~
22 15,9 |         and if confronted with the evidence are ill equipped to deal
23 15,9 |  creationists is too limiting. The evidence is acknowledged, but the
24 15,0 |           our eyes to the physical evidence.~ ~
25 15,1 |         fully accepts the physical evidence for an old earth, but parts
26 15,2 |         body parts. It is possible evidence will still be discovered
27 15,2 |          According to the physical evidence, unicellular prokaryote
28 15,2 |            how do we reconcile the evidence with Scripture?~Digging
29 15,3 |          ago.~According to the new evidence, over 15 different species
30 15,4 |  astrophysics, as they lay out the evidence that Earth may be a singular
31 16,1 | sophisticated stone tools and left evidence of their advanced culture
32 17,3 |          with creation. Scientific evidence shows one that there was
33 17,3 |            supported by scientific evidence.~ ~ ~
34 19,1 |            us the most significant evidence for a universal (with respect
35 19,1 |           the earth's history? The evidence shows that the only place
36 19,1 |            more piece of objective evidence that the Bible is indeed
37 19,1 |           unerring.~ Does all this evidence for a regional flood mean
38 19,1 |      geophysicists find a shred of evidence for recent volcanic activity
39 19,1 |           leave behind substantial evidence, a deposit that geologists
40 19,1 |        years later, all geological evidence of the disaster had been
41 19,1 |          leave behind insufficient evidence for a positive geological
42 19,1 |      global Flood, without leaving evidence easily visible today. The
43 19,1 |        flood. No viable scientific evidence has ever been found for
44 19,2 |                                    Evidence of the Flood.~According
45 19,2 |      without human remains. It was evidence of a deadly flood that appeared
46 19,2 |             providing dramatic new evidence of an apocalyptic flood
47 19,2 |        waterline, the first visual evidence that a flood had occurred
48 22   |         according to the unanimous evidence of such notable world historians
49 App,1| unwarranted to assume the material evidence taken from the more limited
50 App,1|            to dispute the literary evidence from the more complete content
51 App,1|       suspected that they might be evidence of the Hittite nation. Ten
52 App,1|          could not find conclusive evidence to justify this assumption.~
53 App,1|        lived.~ Most intriguing was evidence that a massive fire had
54 App,1|          heaven. Wood states, “The evidence would suggest that this
55 App,1|          dated to be 1410 B.C. The evidence leads Wood to this conclusion. “
56 App,1|        Thus, current archeological evidence supports the Bible's account
57 App,1|         history, until recently no evidence outside the Bible attested
58 App,1|            the foot of Mt. Hermon. Evidence indicates that this is the
59 App,1|        actually mentions David.”~ ~Evidence of Caiaphas's tomb.~The
60 App,1|        Gospels. No direct physical evidence had been found. Then, in