Chapter,  Paragraph

 1 15,1|           the universe, another — evolution.~ In 1650 AD, Archbishop
 2 15,1|        does not mean naturalistic evolution can explain everything.
 3 15,2| Scientists began to embrace this “evolution” theory as research continued
 4 15,5|       Reconciling some Creation / Evolution Questions.~The Church always
 5 15,5|          in nearly every creation/evolution debate. Clear definitions
 6 15,5|     equally to an old-earth view.~Evolution — The theory that groups
 7 15,5|      conflict between a belief in evolution and a belief in the God
 8 15,5|           Bible.~Microevolution — Evolution resulting from a succession
 9 15,5|      Macroevolution — Large-scale evolution occurring over geologic
10 15,6|         What the Bible Says About Evolution.~Since young-earth creationists
11 15,6|         what Scripture says about evolution.~ ~The Beginning of Plant
12 15,6|     record.~Does this mean random evolution from a common ancestor is
13 15,8|          limits of the creation / evolution controversy that we will
14 15,8|        best fit for the evidence.~Evolution defined as “change occurring
15 15,8|         naturalism can claim that evolution is a fact at this observable
16 15,8|      ancestor is accepted in most evolution circles but it is theory
17 15,1|          science when it comes to evolution. The fossil record clearly
18 15,1|        transitional fossils prove evolution. These fossils do exist,
19 15,1|           is as valid a theory as evolution. The Scripture states that
20 15,1|         physics, and no amount of evolution can overcome God's limits.
21 15,2|          traditional naturalistic evolution has no predetermined direction.~
22 15,2|     appear simply as naturalistic evolution to the unobservant, but
23 15,2|         contrary to the theory of evolution about this explosion. In
24 15,2|           as a witness.~A classic evolution / creation argument revolves
25 15,2|      issue as having accepted the evolution of man as factual. Many
26 15,2|          Christians do accept the evolution of man from a primate ancestor,
27 15,2|        statements written against evolution. With all the fuss made
28 15,2|        fuss made in the U.S. over evolution in the past century, this
29 15,2|          natural selection is not evolution, it is design! From the
30 15,3|  Eschewing preconceived models of evolution, some scientists started
31 15,3|         reinterpretation of human evolution. They demonstrate that there
32 15,4|          But they insist that the evolution that led to everything from
33 15,5|                     Orthodoxy and Evolution.~Orthodoxy has neither a
34 15,5|          the Orthodox to disclaim evolution.~ First of all, according
35 15,5|             Secondly, the idea of evolution, given its separation from
36 15,5|          of living things because evolution does not address the question
37 15,5|           writes: “The process of evolution of the organic world belongs
38 15,5|           an indisputable fact of evolution of life on earth.”~ One
39 15,5|       that “in itself the idea of evolution appears not to be alien
40 15,5|     interpretation of the idea of evolution: “If I were facing the task
41 15,5|         to the theory of directed evolution.”~Vladimir Solovyev clearly
42 15,5|         these. This does not deny evolution: evolution can not be denied;
43 15,5|          does not deny evolution: evolution can not be denied; it is
44 15,5|           fact. But to claim that evolution is able to fully create
45 15,5|           the cover of this fact. Evolution of the lower levels of being
46 15,5|  Conditions are the result of the evolution of nature, while that which