Chapter,  Paragraph

 1 1      |       character of early Christian Apologetics.~The most ancient Christian
 2 1      |          be called the ancestor of Apologetics as a science.~The same thoughts
 3 1      |         and the motto of Christian Apologetics became the affirmation: “
 4 1      |      absurdity.”~In the history of Apologetics it is impossible not to
 5 1      | theologians active in the field of Apologetics in the West were St. Vincent
 6 1      |          basis for the teaching of Apologetics in Catholic schools.~The
 7 1      |   Rozhdestvensky, in his Christian Apologetics, notes in complete fairness: “
 8 1      |            of analysis. Concerning Apologetics, the Reformation forced
 9 1      |         the further development of Apologetics was the movement toward
10 1      |            for authentic Christian Apologetics this was not enough. Arguments
11 1      |   principal enemy fought by German Apologetics in the 17th and 18th centuries
12 1      |          great rise of interest in Apologetics and contributed to the growth
13 1      |            scientific, theological Apologetics. This is explained by the
14 1      |          of Catholic dogmatics and Apologetics.~During the 19th and 20th
15 1      |   Protestant theologians.~Orthodox Apologetics, however, has always tried
16 1      |      world-view. The literature of Apologetics is unusually vast, diverse
17 1      |       deeply absorbing textbook of Apologetics has not yet been prepared.~
18 1      |         Among the various works on Apologetics written in the 19th and
19 1      |         and J. Ebrard (1818-1888), Apologetics. All of these works are
20 1      |          Orthodox Russian works in Apologetics, noteworthy are the classic
21 1      |          Rozhdestvensky, Christian Apologetics — A Course of Fundamental
22 2      |            Fundamental Theology or Apologetics does engage in proving their
23 3      |          existence? Philosophy and apologetics have the so-called “arguments
24 5      |          often imagined. Christian Apologetics, therefore, does engage
25 7      |          not at all obligatory for Apologetics.~A logical analysis, however,
26 8      |          Rozhdestvensky, Christian Apologetics, and others.~Speaking practically,
27 11     |      serious question of Christian Apologetics and, therefore, is subject
28 11     |      instance, Tertullian, in his “Apologetics,” pointed to the unusually
29 21     |    Professor N.P. Rozhdestvensky’s Apologetics, Book 2, page 352).~ ~
30 24     |     fundamental stone of Christian Apologetics.” The proof of the truth
31 Conclu |           criticism with impartial apologetics, it answers slander with
32 App,1  |     biblical studies and Christian apologetics in several ways.~ First,