Chapter,  Paragraph

 1 1   |   philosophy, can be called the ancestor of Apologetics as a science.~
 2 15,5|   involve origins from a common ancestor and is often associated
 3 15,6|         evolution from a common ancestor is God's chosen method of
 4 15,7|      and a tiger share a common ancestor. The real problem comes
 5 15,7|      make the case for a common ancestor very strong. If this conclusion
 6 15,7|       to form man was a primate ancestor that the earth brought forth,
 7 15,8|     apes have a common physical ancestor might be true. It is suggested
 8 15,8|         descended from a common ancestor is accepted in most evolution
 9 15,8|      modification from a common ancestor might have occurred continue
10 15,1|      possible they had a common ancestor. They may not be of the
11 15,2|  necessarily have been a common ancestor between the phyla. Yet this
12 15,2|      the phyla. Yet this common ancestor would most certainly have
13 15,2|      whether they have a common ancestor is not that important an
14 15,2| evolution of man from a primate ancestor, but insist on the fundamental
15 15,2|         may have been a primate ancestor, and there is no real conflict
16 15,2|        even if he has a primate ancestor.~The psalmist declares man
17 15,2|       come from a recent common ancestor.~The fossil record is suggestive,
18 15,2|  science. IF God used a primate ancestor to form the body of man
19 15,3|   spread hominid was our direct ancestor. It is increasingly clear