Many opinions have been expressed in regard to the essence of
Christianity. But nobody has been able to define this essence in such a
convincing way as it is defined by the Orthodox Church. First of all, the complete
inability to resolve this question in only a rationalistic way should be noted.
For rationalism, Christianity will forever remain an insoluble puzzle to this
greatest world phenomenon. Among rationalistic attempts to make clear the
essence of Christianity, two basic tendencies should be noted: 1) to reduce the
whole essence of Christianity only to its moral principles, and 2) to represent
Christianity in the form of a system of abstract ideas.
A
striking instance of the former is the opinion of Christianity held by the
well-known German philosopher Immanuel Kant. According to Kant, Christianity
differs from all other religions only in its moral superiority over them.
According to this reasoning, Christ is the ideal type of moral perfection. His
precepts are the most complete and perfect expression of the morally ideal
demands of man’s nature. His Church is a society where ethical good is
accomplished. The whole nature of a Christian is in his ideal system of morals.
However, the dogmatic teaching of Christianity has no special meaning. In
general, the whole objective meaning of the Christian religion — the Redemption
of mankind for its salvation and eternal blessedness — is denied by the system
of Kant as transcendent and not essential to man’s life on earth. Such
reasoning is deeply mistaken. In the presence of an attentive attitude toward
Christianity, it becomes deeply clear that it is not possible to view it as
morality without dogma (as Buddhism may be), since the moral teaching of Christ
is found to be in more than just an external, formal bond with religious
doctrine. Christianity is not restricted, like some systems of ethics, only to
a tendency to justify ethical demands with religious sanction and to base the
ethical obligations of man on the will of a higher Being. All Christian morality is founded on dogmatics,
and lacking these it loses its full meaning.
The
dogmatic teaching on the most holy and undivided Trinity, the Incarnation of
the Son of God, the Redemption of the race of man and its salvation, has, in
Christianity, not secondary but fundamental meaning. Dogma does not appear in
Christianity simply to add a higher authority to moral teaching. On the
contrary, it is the center of all Christian religion, and the morals result
from it.
Christian
morality, even deprived of its dogmatic roots, without a doubt represents the
same enchanting, attractive, and fascinating phenomenon which cannot be
compared to any other system of morality, excelling them all by its fullness,
simplicity, and persuasiveness. And this one circumstance directs the thought
to the divine origin of such ethical teaching. With deeper penetration,
however, into the roots of this system of ethics; that is, into the dogmatic
meaning, which illuminates like the sun all the harmony of the whole and the
endless diversity of the parts, the ethical teaching of Christianity completely
transforms man’s soul and reveals to it the possibility of seeing, here on
earth, the rudiments of that blessed eternal state which is prepared by God for
man in another, better, eternal world.
Only
by this eternal root is it possible to explain the undying attraction of the
Christian ideal of morality which has passed the test of time, gaining with
every success of man’s spiritual culture a new beauty and strength,
contributing its charitable influence into all phases of life. Only
Christianity is capable of kindling love toward Truth, for the sake of Truth
itself, without which no real spiritual progress of man is possible. The
undoubted ethically charitable influence of the ethical Christian ideal on all
mankind is one of the most convincing proofs of its divine dignity.
From
the Gnostics of the first centuries of Christianity to Hegelianism in its
contemporary currents, the essence of Christianity is treated as an abstract
system of higher knowledge, as an abstract philosophy theoretically solving the
problems of cosmogony and theogony. But the most
important side of Christianity, without which it is nothing — the fact of the
Incarnation of the Son of God and the Redemption by Him of sinful mankind; that
is, that unusual phenomenon of history eternally issuing from a series of
ordinary historical phenomena — has been relegated to the domain of myths by
the rationalistic school from antiquity to the present. For example, the pastor
and professor Arthur Drives came to this when he wrote the book, The Myth of Christ.
Feuerbach, a leftist Hegelian, wrote a long investigation, About the Substance of Christianity.
Contrasting the essence of Christianity with the essence of paganism, Feuerbach came to the conclusion that in Christianity,
subjectivity predominates over objectivity; the heart and imagination over
intellect. He sees in Christianity a system or world-view for which the
external world with all its laws of nature has no meaning. As a result, Feuerbach finds in Christianity a
hostility to intellect, knowledge, and all progress: social, scientific,
political, economic, etc. The teaching of Feuerbach
penetrated into Marxism and, through it, into Bolshevik communism, becoming the
state irreligion in Soviet Russia.
The
gross mistakes of Feuerbach are completely clear to
genuine critical thought. Firstly, Christianity, as we pointed out earlier, was
never hostile to genuine intellect, genuine science, and genuine knowledge. But
Christianity has never rated human intellect higher than spiritual development.
Without humbling the intellect, it only placed the latter in a harmonious
relationship with other spiritual forces. Christianity does not make a god of
man’s intellect, but regards it as a talent given by God which should be
applied to life, and encourages knowledge which serves as a weapon in the
search for and service to Truth, goodness and beauty.
Christianity
does not at all break the ties of man to the world and does not resist the progress
of genuine science. It simply points out the eternal superiority of the Creator
over the world created by Him, the immortal designation of man, and the
transient meaning of the material world; it points to temporal life as only a
preparatory phase to eternal life. By this teaching, Christianity simply
assists the spiritual development of man and his moral growth in the present
temporal life. History shows how much Christianity assisted the progress of
natural science, that is, that science which was especially engaged in the
investigation of nature.
Of
all religions, only Christianity does not contain in its basic truths anything
hostile to true progress. To nature it gives a warm and happy regard, as to a
creation of God. In contrast to pagan culture which deifies the sun, moon, and
stars, the Christian faith places them at the feet of the Creator. It is
Christianity which liberated mankind from the degrading slavery to the elements
of the world and taught man to rule over nature to a much greater degree than
is dreamed of by rationalistic science (walking on water and resurrection of
the dead).
The
idea of the unity and solidarity of peoples is purely a Christian idea. The
great structure of international law rests on this Christian ideal. In its
social relationship, the charitable influence of Christianity is irrefutable.
It created Christian marriage and the Christian family. It has elevated to an
extraordinary degree the ethical dignity of woman: maiden, mother, wife. In contrast
to the pagan neglect of children, Christianity set up the precepts of Christ,
dooming every tempter and corrupter of children’s innocence to the most bitter
fate of drowning with a millstone round the neck.
Paganism,
even in the persons of its best representatives, justified and supported
slavery; Christianity, however, by systematically destroying a part at a time
the foundations by which it was justified in antiquity, led finally to its
destruction. Christianity softened cruelty to criminals. We shall remind you
that the lord Himself, while on earth, selected the disparaging calling of a
workman and, by this, removed the brand of scorn from all honest labor. “To
work and to pray” became the motto of Christian life. All monasticism passed
its time in labors and prayer.
In
order to correctly understand and determine the essence of Christianity, it is
necessary to keep in mind that it is entirely beholden for its origin to the
divine Personality of its Founder and carries a vital imprint of this
Personality in everything. The Christian religion, like its Founder, is first
of all complete, harmonious, and all-embracing. It has no deficiencies and is
not subject to improvement. It is ideal. Only the Christian himself is subject
to improvement, without limits. The ideal of his perfection is endless. Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father
which is in heaven is perfect (Matt. 5:48).
Only
the Christian religion has a complete right to be called, in the proper sense
of the word, a religion, that is, a union with God. Christianity embraces our
whole existence, spiritual and bodily. It enlightens all our family, social,
and political relationships. It satisfies all the demands of the spiritual,
intellectual and bodily life of man.
To
fully comprehend the essence of Christianity, the basic truths of the Christian
religion ought to be investigated. First of all, Christianity is not so much a
new system of religious and ethical doctrine as it is a new principle of life
and activity of man. Although not everything is new in the New Testament or
Christian religion in comparison with the religion of the Old Testament,
nevertheless, even that which is taken by Christianity from the religion of
Israel shines with the new light of a more profound and perfected meaning.
Even
though there are in both Old and New Testaments general dogmatic truths (of the
unity of the divine Being, of divine virtues, of the origin of man, of his
primal state, his fall, and others), nevertheless, these truths are presented more
clearly, purely, deeply and spiritually and are more free from elements of
anthropomorphism in the New Testament, while in the Old Testament,
anthropomorphism veils the spiritual nature of the divine Being. The words of Christ that God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must
worship him in spirit and in truth (John 4:24), would be
impossible to find in the Old Testament.
Some
revealed truths in the Old Testament were expressed so covertly that even some
more spiritually developed Old Testament people were forced to ponder such
things as the indication of the mystery of the Trinity, the mystery of the Word
and Spirit of God, and others. These mysteries which were concealed from Old
Testament prophets were revealed only by the Savior Himself. Present-day Hebrew
scholars unjustly affirm that in the entire Old Testament there are no
indications of the mystery of the Trinity. But it is impossible not to see in
the Old Testament an undisclosed understanding about the special powers of God:
the Word of God and the Spirit of God. The appearance of the Triune God to
Abraham in the form of three angels also remains undisclosed in the Old
Testament. Only in the New Testament was the mystery of the Most Holy Trinity
finally revealed in all its completeness and made accessible to man’s understanding.
The
mystery of the Holy Trinity is the heart of Christian dogma! This mystery has
an immense, inexhaustible meaning, purely theoretical as well as ethical. The
theoretical meaning of the Christian teaching about the Holy Trinity consists,
first of all, in the purification, elevation and elucidation of the idea of
monotheism. The Christian teaching of the Holy Trinity is no tri-godliness or
tri-theism, which is directly and decisively censured by the Christian Church. The
teaching of the Trinity is a special aspect of monotheism, but very profound,
lofty and pure, and one we do not meet in any other monotheistic system.
The
essential point in the Christian teaching about God is that, by revealing the
dogma of the Holy Trinity, it both preserves the inviolability of the Old
Testament teaching of the unity of the Divinity, and adds to it a special, new,
exceptionally significant, highly ethical character, which was not and could
not have been present in any other system of monotheism. Not without cause did Origen, Blessed Augustine, and St. Gregory of Nyssa, in
analyzing the mystery of the Holy Trinity, demonstrate
the Truth and divinity of Christianity.
Strict
monotheism bestows little to the loftiness and ethical worth of the religion
that is preaching it; you can imagine for yourself a religion of one idol. Some
of the thinkers of pre-Christian antiquity reached the understanding of the
unity of the highest Being, but the idea about the inner nature of such a Being
outside of His relation to the world, that is, the life of God in Himself, was incomprehensible. As a result of this,
monotheism transformed itself into either pantheism, acknowledging eternal
disclose of divine life and substance in the world, or barren deism.
Only
Christianity, through the disclosure of the dogma of the Holy Trinity, has
given a solution to the question of the nature of the one God in Himself. Only
Christianity discloses the truth that God (in His essence, one eternal Spirit)
has definite realities of existence, outside His relationship to the world;
i.e., in His tri-personal Being and in the eternal
fullness of His inner life He is unknown to us. Not explaining the very essence
of the mystery of the Trinity, this dogma clarifies for our mind something
concerning the divine Being: namely, that there is in the divine Being an
activity not dependent on the world, and there are conditions for its manifestation.
Although an understanding of the triune God is exceptionally difficult, still,
an understanding of His bare oneness is more difficult. “The Christian God is
one but not solitary” (St. Peter Chrysologus, 60th Word).
But
besides its theoretical meaning, the dogma of the Holy Trinity also has an
ethical meaning (The Ethical Idea of
Church Dogma, by Anthony Krapovitsky). Through
the mystery of the Trinity, Christianity taught mankind not only to respect God
with reverence, but also to love Him. Through the mystery of the Holy Trinity a
new idea was disclosed: that God is love — most lofty, ideal love, and an
inexhaustible fountain of love. Blessed Augustine affirmed with profound
thoughtfulness: “The mystery of the Christian Trinity is a mystery of divine
Love. You see the Trinity if you see Love.”
The
mystery of the Trinity teaches us that divine Love was manifested not only in
the creation and contemplation of the world, but that it appears in its most
perfect, infinite fullness in the very bosom of the Divinity, where a life of
love resided from eternity: the eternal communion of the holy love of the
Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. Thus, it can be asserted that barren
monotheism of ancient religions, not impregnated by the revealed truth of the
Trinity, did not have and could not have had a true understanding of divine
Love.
The
main distinction between the strict monotheism of contemporary Judaism and the
Christian faith consists in the understanding of the basic divine Essence. Only
Christianity, through the Revelation of Christ Himself, knows and understands
the truth that God is Love and what love is! As expressed by the Christian
poet, A. Tolstoy, Christ “subordinated all the laws of Moses to the law of
love.” To understand this idea of a God of Love is impossible in barren
monotheism, for whom could God have loved except Himself? Though the mystery of
the Trinity does not initiate us into the complete profundity of the essence of
Divinity (being too vast for man’s mind), it alone allows us to understand that
divine Love was never inactive, never remained without manifestation, and never
was self-love, but points to the eternal divine communion of the Persons of the
Holy Trinity.
The
complete depth of the love of the Divinity for the race of man is elucidated
for us with finality in the light of the mystery of the Holy Trinity. This mystery
is also the foundation of the whole Christian teaching on Redemption. The
supreme example of love in the sacrifice by God the Father of His Only-begotten
Son for the salvation of the race of man, in the voluntary suffering on the
cross of the Son of God for our redemption; and in the descent of the Holy
Spirit for our sanctification — stunning the soul of man — begets a responsive,
thankful, self-denying love for God, Whom the Christian begins to understand as
the loving Father of all mankind.
If
we will also meditate just as deeply upon the Christian teaching of the
Incarnation of the Second Person of the Holy Trinity, we shall see that it
likewise has not only a deeply theoretical but also a universally ethical
meaning. It elevated the moral conscience of man to a height which would have
been impossible to reach without the aid of God. This truth was formulated by
some of the ancient teachers of the Church in this way: “In the mystery of the
Incarnation, God condescended to the state of man in order to raise man to
God.”
The
miracle of the Resurrection of Christ is the crown of all the other miracles
and comprises, according to the vivid expression of Professor N.P. Rozhdestvensky, “the fundamental stone of Christian
Apologetics.” The proof of the truth of the Resurrection of Christ is exceptionally
plain and very convincing. This proof comes to the conclusion that without the
actual fact of the Resurrection, the following points would be completely
inexplicable: the beginning of the Apostle’s preaching, the appearance in the
world of historical Christianity with its martyrs, apologists, teachers of the
Church and holy zealots, and, finally, the existence on earth to the present
day of millions of faithful Christians, ready to give their lives for Christ.