For a deeper understanding of the essence of religion, an explanation
should be given of its relationship to other facets of the spiritual life of
man. Most important is an explanation of the relationship of religion to
morality, to science and to the arts.
The first and
main relationship between religion and morality is the relationship of their
inalienable reciprocal action. Religion and morality are tightly bound
together. Religion is not possible without morality, and morality is not
possible without religion. Faith without deeds is dead. With such a faith only
demons believe (believe and tremble). True faith, however (alive, not dead),
cannot be without good deeds. As a naturally fragrant flower cannot but be
sweet-smelling, so true faith cannot but be testified to by good morality. In
its turn morality, too, without a religious foundation and religious light,
cannot exist and must certainly wither, like a plant deprived of a root,
moisture and sun.
Religion without
morality is similar to a sterile fig tree; whereas morality without religion is
similar to a fig tree which has been cut down. However, the close and
unbreakable reciprocal tie between religion and morality does not at all make
them identical. In order for this to be understood, it is necessary that along
with their relationship, we show their difference. Even many prominent
philosophers did not understand this difference.
For instance,
Kant asserted: “Religion in itself or objectively differs in nothing from morality,
in that the general objectives of one and the other consist of ethical
obligations; the difference between religion and morality is only formal” (The Dispute of the Faculties, 1798).
This formal difference, according to Kant, consists in the fact that religion
rouses us to regard our ethical obligations not just as the demands of ethical
duty, but as godly commandments.
The view that
the heart of a religion is in teaching on morality and that all the rest is
only its “form” was asserted long ago. Such in essence is the teaching of
Buddha and of Confucius. In ancient Greek philosophy, the Stoics regarded
morality higher than religion. Leo Tolstoy also identified religion with
morality.
The difference
between a religious feeling and a moral feeling may be understood if we focus
on the differing psychology of these experiences and on the difference in their
objectives. An ethical feeling is characterized by a movement toward the
ethically good, that is, “right” or “appropriate” conduct; a religious feeling,
however, tends towards the infinite, that which is perfect in all respects
toward the Absolute. The aim of the former is the satisfaction of the demands
of moral duty and a longing for ethical perfection; the aim of the latter is
unity with God.
Christianity
asserts categorically that without the help of God it is impossible to do anything,
even to live: Without Me you can do
nothing (John 15:5). Every plant,
which My heavenly Father hath not planted, shall be rooted up (Matt. 15:13). I am the way, the truth
and the life (John 14:6).
Therefore,
between religion and morality there exists the same relationship as that which
exists between life and activity. No activity is possible without life.
Religion gives life. And only on condition of this life is moral activity
possible. Only through God can there be life. Without God life becomes death.
The ideal of Christian morality is religious: Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is
perfect (Matt. 5:48).