Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

  1   1,1,5  |              a part. As the Gospel of St. John concludes: “And there
  2   1,1,5  |     foolishness). ~ The Revelation of St. John the Theologian (or
  3   1,1,5  |               to have been written by St. John near the end of his ~
  4   1,1,5  |              A.D. 63, as it refers to St. Paul.s imprisonment at
  5   1,1,5  |             most of the epis-~tles of St. Paul, as well as various
  6   1,1,5  |              not until A.D. 369, with St. Athanasius.s .Festal Epistle.
  7   1,1,5  |             ultimately cor-~rupted by St. Constantine. The formal
  8   1,1,5  |               five years earlier than St. Athanasius. Epistle, however,
  9   1,1,5  |               Hermas; the epistles of St. Clement, of St. Ignatius,
 10   1,1,5  |           epistles of St. Clement, of St. Ignatius, of St. ~Polycarp).
 11   1,1,5  |          Clement, of St. Ignatius, of St. ~Polycarp). Some of these
 12   1,1,5  |     theologians of the Church such as St. Gregory Nazianzus (called .
 13   1,1,5  |           called .the Theo-~logian.), St. Basil the Great, St. John
 14   1,1,5  |                  St. Basil the Great, St. John of Damascus, St. Symeon
 15   1,1,5  |          Great, St. John of Damascus, St. Symeon the New Theologian
 16   1,1,6  |             holy text. However, after St. Jerome . one of the most
 17   1,1,6  |         Council of Trent ~established St. Jerome.s version as the
 18   1,1,6  |              lands. Upon the death of St. Cyril, St. Methodius ~completed
 19   1,1,6  |               the death of St. Cyril, St. Methodius ~completed the
 20   1,1,6  |        Christianity under the rule of St. Vladimir, and the Slavonic
 21   1,1,6  |               notable lumi-~naries as St. Tikhon of Zadonsk, Metropolitan
 22   1,1,6  |              Paul ~9 . Revelations of St. John (Apocalypse). ~ ~
 23   1,1,7  |            freedom under the reign of St. Constantine, which by the
 24   1,4,2  |            just praising the Creator. St. Ambrose of Milan ~writes
 25   1,4,3  |            the Word. He, according to St. John Theologian, created
 26   1,5,5  |       compared to the Revela-~tion of St. John the Theologian. The
 27   1,Add,2|               as he can. According to St. John Chrysostom, it is
 28   1,Add,3|               holy Fathers, headed by St. John Chrysostom who, in
 29   1,Add,8|              Truth. ~ For this reason St. James the Apostle writes
 30   1,Add,8|            word of truth” (1:18), and St. Peter tells them that they
 31   1,Add,9|     juvenescens, to use the phrase of St. Irenaeus. The creed is
 32   1,Add,9|              use the famous phrase of St. Augustine. Possibly this
 33   1,Add,9|          would risk a suggestion that St. Athanasius and St. Augustine
 34   1,Add,9|               that St. Athanasius and St. Augustine are much more
 35   1,Add,0|         letter but with the ~message. St. Hilary put it emphatically:
 36   1,Add,0|              Evangelists. (with which St. Augustine was wrestling).
 37   1,Add,0|               day of Pentecost, ~when St. Peter as an eye-witness (
 38   1,Add,0|          things not seen” (Heb. 11:1: St. John Chrysostorn explains
 39   1,Add,0|              corpus, in the phrase of St. Augustine) and of the Holy
 40   1,Add,0|              was practiced already by St. Paul (if under the name
 41   1,Add,0|              been revealed in Christ. St. Augustine put it very ~
 42   1,Add,0|               their faith and hope. ~ St. Augustine suggested that
 43   1,Add,0|                In this sense ~already St. Justin emphatically rejected
 44   1,Add,1|            Church had not moved me]. ~St. Augustine, contra epist.
 45   1,Add,1|              epist. Manichaei, L1. ~ ~St. Vincent of Lerins and tradition.~
 46   1,Add,1|      tradition.~ The famous dictum of St. Vincent of Lerins was characteristic
 47   1,Add,1|     permanence of Christian teaching. St. Vincent was actually appealing
 48   1,Add,1|            vision ~which had inspired St. Irenaeus in his own time:
 49   1,Add,1|              origins. Now, suggested ~St. Vincent, the true faith
 50   1,Add,1|         variety of .private. opinions St. Vincent op-~poses the .
 51   1,Add,1|       Tradition was not, according to St. Vincent, an inde-~pendent
 52   1,Add,1|                 And Scripture was for St. Vincent the only, primary
 53   1,Add,1|        Ancient Church.~ At this point St. Vincent was in full agreement
 54   1,Add,1|             the admira-~ble phrase of St. Hilary of Poitiers, .For
 55   1,Add,1|            phrase is repeated also by St. Jerome, Dial. c. Lucifer.,
 56   1,Add,1|                 46 (Paris, 1957)]. ~ ~St. Irenaeus and the “Canon
 57   1,Add,1|            mishandling of Scriptures, St. Irenaeus introduced a picturesque ~
 58   1,Add,1|              adv. hoeres., 1. 8. 1) . St. Irenaeus suggested as well
 59   1,Add,1|            time. Now, the point which St. Irenaeus endeavored to
 60   1,Add,1|      Scripture itself. Now, contended St. Irenaeus, those who ~had
 61   1,Add,1|             The actual phrase used by St. Irenaeus is peculiar: prosarmosas
 62   1,Add,1|               body.. In the phrase of St. Irenaeus it denotes the
 63   1,Add,1|               ss. 331-332]. Thus, for St. Irenaeus, the reading of
 64   1,Add,1|                The favorite phrase of St. Irenaeus was .the rule
 65   1,Add,1|           Divine Revelation), so that St. ~Irenaeus did not imply
 66   1,Add,1|            doubt that, in the mind of St. Irenaeus, this continuous
 67   1,Add,1|           conception of the Church in St. Irenaeus was at once .char-~
 68   1,Add,1|               truth was, according to St. Irenaeus, a .well-grounded
 69   1,Add,1|             Flesseman, pp. 92-96. ~On St. Irenaeus see Flesseman,
 70   1,Add,1|          théologie (Paris, 1960)]. ~ ~St. Athanasius and the “Scope
 71   1,Add,1|              and the usual method, of St. Atha-~nasius. The Arians
 72   1,Add,1|              was a creature. In reply St. Athanasius invoked the .
 73   1,Add,1|     interpreted. (c. Arian. III. 35). St. Athanasius contended that
 74   1,Add,1|         Serapion, on the Holy Spirit, St. Athana-~sius contends again
 75   1,Add,1|               was, in the language of St. Athanasius, a close equivalent ~
 76   1,Add,1|             close equivalent ~of what St. Irenaeus used to denote
 77   1,Add,1|            keep it all time in ~mind. St. Athanasius could well be
 78   1,Add,1|           term skopos in the idiom of St. Athanasius ~as .the general
 79   1,Add,1|          Newman has rightly observed, St. Athanasius regarded the ~.
 80   1,Add,1|         heretics [Select Treatises of St. Athanasius, freely ~translated
 81   1,Add,1|               of the Arian arguments, St. Athanasius would summarize
 82   1,Add,1|            this exegetical manner of ~St. Athanasius: ~ ~Against
 83   1,Add,1|        certainly not the intention of St. Athanasius himself. For
 84   1,Add,1|        scriptural, and, in principle, St. Athanasius admitted the
 85   1,Add,1|            this preaching in epitome. St. Athanasius writes to Bishop
 86   1,Add,1|              highly characteristic of St. Athanasius. The ~three
 87   1,Add,1|             first epistle to Serapion St. Athanasius returns once
 88   1,Add,1|                c. 33). On an occasion St. Athanasius de-~noted the
 89   1,Add,1|               was in fact composed by St. ~Prosper of Aquitania: .
 90   1,Add,1|            worship and meditation. ~ ~St. Basil and “Unwritten Tradition.”~
 91   1,Add,1|        Unwritten Tradition.”~ Already St. Irenaeus used to refer
 92   1,Add,1|           were used by Tertullian and St. Cyprian [See Federer, op.
 93   1,Add,1| Trinitätrtheologie (Tübingen, 1956)]. St. Athana-~sius and the Cappadocians
 94   1,Add,1|       liturgical tradition we find in St. Basil. In his contest with
 95   1,Add,1|          concerning the ~Holy Spirit, St. Basil built his major argument
 96   1,Add,1|             Churches. The treatise of St. Basil, De Spiritu Sancto,
 97   1,Add,1|               historic situation. But St. Basil ~was concerned here
 98   1,Add,1|       investigation. In his treatise ~St. Basil was arguing a particular
 99   1,Add,1|               in this ~situation that St. Basil endeavored to prove
100   1,Add,1|         served, the omotimos, was for St. Basil an equivalent of
101   1,Add,1|               get the impression that St. Basil introduces ~here
102   1,Add,1|      embarrassed by the contention of St. Basil that dogmata were
103   1,Add,1|            fact, it is precisely what St. Basil says himself: ~Most
104   1,Add,1|             Eucharist, which are, for St. Basil, of .Apostolic. ~
105   1,Add,1|               He quotes at this point St. Paul.s own reference to .
106   1,Add,1|             all in-~stances quoted by St. Basil in this connection
107   1,Add,1|        mysteries of the Church,. says St. Basil (c. 66 and 67). ~
108   1,Add,1|           communication. According to St. Basil, they come from a .
109   1,Add,1|            fact, .tradition. to which St. Basil appeals, ~is the
110   1,Add,1|               practice of the Church. St. Basil is referring here
111   1,Add,1|        purpose. On the other hand, as St. Basil ~says himself, certain .
112   1,Add,1|            there the Procatechesis of St. Cyril of Jerusa-~lem, cap
113   1,Add,1|               In the West Rufinus and St. Augustine felt that it
114   1,Add,1|         context, that the argument of St. ~Basil must be assessed
115   1,Add,1|             assessed and interpreted. St. Basil stresses strongly
116   1,Add,1|          London, 1962), pp. 27 ss]. ~ St. Basil.s appeal to .unwritten
117   1,Add,1|              of the Scripture itself. St. Basil was strictly scriptural
118   1,Add,1|          through generations, was for St. Basil an indispensable
119   1,Add,1|             following in the steps of St. Irenaeus and St. ~Athanasius.
120   1,Add,1|             steps of St. Irenaeus and St. ~Athanasius. In the similar
121   1,Add,1|               the Church was ~used by St. Augustine [Cf. German Mártin,
122   1,Add,1|              the Ancient Church, from St. Irenaeus down to ~Chalcedon,
123   1,Add,1|               Chalcedon, and further. St. Irenaeus was quite formal
124   1,Add,1|            ve-~hemence of expression, St. Jerome, this great man
125   1,Add,1|             of God as in the days of ~St. Irenaeus, Tertullian, and
126   1,Add,1|               Tertullian, and Origen. St. Jerome probably was simply
127   1,Add,1|             the same ap-~proach as in St. Basil. Again, St. Jerome
128   1,Add,1|               as in St. Basil. Again, St. Jerome is speaking here
129   1,Add,1|          those who hear the Word]. ~ ~St. Augustine and Catholic
130   1,Add,1|               startling, statement of St. ~Augustine: Ego vero Evangelio
131   1,Add,1|               context. First of ~all, St. Augustine did not utter
132   1,Add,1|            Catholica belong together. St. Augustine had no intention .
133   1,Add,1|              Word of God according to St. Augustine ~(Grand Rapids,
134   2,2,2  |         correctly convey His message. St. Peter pointed to this requirement~
135   2,2,3  |          concludes that the Gospel of St. Matthew was written~prior
136   2,2,3  |               that is, before 70 A.D. St. John the Theologian wrote
137   2,2,3  |           shortly after the Gospel of St. Luke, and as indicated
138   2,2,3  |               the Gospel according to St. Luke.~
139   2,2,5  |             in~Galilee, while that of St. John speaks of our Lord’
140   2,2,5  |             of our Lord’s life, while St. John’s Gospel discusses~
141   2,2,5  |             between the synoptics and St. John.~Although St. John
142   2,2,5  |      synoptics and St. John.~Although St. John narrates very little
143   2,2,5  |             between the synoptics and St. John lies in their documentation~
144   2,2,5  |             easy to understand,~while St. John’s are deep, mysterious
145   2,2,5  |           ignorant people of Galilee.~St. John in general, conveys
146   2,2,5  |              see later, the~Gospel of St. John had a special goal,
147   2,2,5  |             between~the synoptics and St. John. If the synoptics
148   2,2,5  |            human aspect of Christ and St.~John predominantly His
149   2,2,5  |              the Divine~side, or that St. John fails to show the
150   2,2,5  |              Son of~God, according to St. John, is also a true man,
151   2,2,5  |               Thus, the synoptics and St. John mutually enhance and
152   2,2,5  |               The Gospel According to St. Matthew.~The Evangelist
153   2,2,5  |          overcharging in the process.~St. Matthew narrates about
154   2,2,5  |                In writing his Gospel, St. Matthew’s main objective
155   2,2,5  |            seen also in the fact~that St. Matthew, unlike the other
156   2,2,5  |            Palestine for a long time, St. Matthew traveled to other
157   2,2,5  |               The Gospel According to St. Mark.~The Evangelist Mark
158   2,2,5  |         travel~companion to Christ as St. Matthew had been.~He wrote
159   2,2,5  |           based on conversations with St. Peter and under his guidance.
160   2,2,5  |               perceives this youth~as St. Mark himself, the author
161   2,2,5  |              Mark later traveled with St. Paul on his first missionary
162   2,2,5  |        Colossians.~Later, apparently, St. Mark became a fellow traveler
163   2,2,5  |        traveler and collaborator with St. Peter,~which is substantiated
164   2,2,5  |               Prior to his~departure, St. Paul summons him again
165   2,2,5  |        According to ancient tradition St. Peter designated St.~Mark
166   2,2,5  |        tradition St. Peter designated St.~Mark the first Bishop of
167   2,2,5  |            church in Alexandria where St. Mark ended his life as
168   2,2,5  |        Hieropolis, as well as that of St. Justin the Philosopher~
169   2,2,5  |            Justin the Philosopher~and St. Irenaeus of Lyons, St.
170   2,2,5  |            and St. Irenaeus of Lyons, St. Mark wrote his Gospel based
171   2,2,5  |             based on discussions with St.~Peter. St. Justin refers
172   2,2,5  |           discussions with St.~Peter. St. Justin refers to it directly
173   2,2,5  |             claims that the Gospel of St. Mark essentially represents
174   2,2,5  |       represents a written version of St.~Peter’s sermons, which
175   2,2,5  |                Peter’s sermons, which St. Mark documented at the
176   2,2,5  |             Rome. The~very context of St. Mark’s Gospel testifies
177   2,2,5  |       Testament, is omitted.~Instead, St. Mark’s main objective is
178   2,2,5  |               The Gospel According to St. Luke.~The ancient historian,
179   2,2,5  |              of Caesarea, states that St. Luke came from Antioch,~
180   2,2,5  |           rise to the assumption that St. Luke was a gentile or proselyte —
181   2,2,5  |               seen in the Epistles of St. Paul to~the Colossians.
182   2,2,5  |           tradition adds to this that St. Luke was also an artist.
183   2,2,5  |          journey of the~Apostle Paul, St. Luke became his constant
184   2,2,5  |               that after the death of St. Paul, St. Luke preached
185   2,2,5  |          after the death of St. Paul, St. Luke preached and died
186   2,2,5  |              holy relics and those of St.~Andrew the Apostle were
187   2,2,5  |          preface of the third Gospel, St. Luke wrote it at the request
188   2,2,5  |               have been necessary for St. Luke to~make geographic
189   2,2,5  |            book of Acts and for which St. Luke gives no explanations.
190   2,2,5  |            for Antiochian Christians.~St. Luke’s Gospel clearly shows
191   2,2,5  |        clearly shows the influence of St. Paul with whom St. Luke
192   2,2,5  |       influence of St. Paul with whom St. Luke collaborated~and traveled.
193   2,2,5  |              Apostle to the Gentiles, St. Paul tried most of all
194   2,2,5  |              repentant sinners as did St. Luke,~placing in his Gospel
195   2,2,5  |               place of the writing of St. Luke’s Gospel can be derived
196   2,2,5  |              ends with a narrative of St. Paul’s~two year ministry
197   2,2,5  |           Consequently, the Gospel of St. Luke could not have been
198   2,2,5  |               The Gospel According to St. John.~The Evangelist St.
199   2,2,5  |              St. John.~The Evangelist St. John the Theologian was
200   2,2,5  |             of Joseph the hoop maker.~St. John was at first a disciple
201   2,2,5  |            was at first a disciple of St. John the Forerunner. After
202   2,2,5  |       followed Christ (John 1:37-40). St. John later became a steadfast
203   2,2,5  |          Ascension, we frequently see St. John with St. Peter. He
204   2,2,5  |          frequently see St. John with St. Peter. He together with~
205   2,2,5  |               Peter. He together with~St. Peter and St. James are
206   2,2,5  |           together with~St. Peter and St. James are considered as
207   2,2,5  |             destruction of Jerusalem, St. John resides and ministers
208   2,2,5  |               Ephesus from his exile,~St. John wrote his Gospel and
209   2,2,5  |         Trajan.~Tradition claims that St. John wrote his Gospel at
210   2,2,5  |          speeches which he had heard. St. John verified the truth
211   2,2,5  |               the Divinity of Christ. St. Irenaeus of Lyon wrote~
212   2,2,5  |       Spiritual~Gospel.~The Gospel of St. John begins with the exposition
213   2,2,5  |               of the Christian faith, St. John received the respected
214   2,2,5  |           return with a~special love, St. John penetrated deeply
215   2,2,5  |          Christ primarily in Galilee, St. John describes events~and
216   2,3,2  |               discourse on this~Book, St. John Chrysostom explains
217   2,3,2  |             of the early writers like St. Ignatius Theophorus (God
218   2,3,2  |              Theophorus (God Bearer),~St. Polycarp, and St. Justin
219   2,3,2  |            Bearer),~St. Polycarp, and St. Justin the Martyr. Through
220   2,3,2  |              second century writers – St.~Irenaeus of Lyon, Clement
221   2,3,2  |         around the years 63 or 64 AD. St. Paul’s Epistles to~the
222   2,3,3  |         biographical data.~Epistle of St. Apostle James.~The author
223   2,3,3  |             the Twelve and brother of St. John the Theologian; 2)
224   2,3,3  |            James~Alphaeus, brother of St. Apostle and Evangelist
225   2,3,3  |             he was called “the Less.”~St. James Zebedee’s early death
226   2,3,3  |              according to Acts 12:2). St. James Alphaeus preached
227   2,3,3  |             form of Divine Liturgy to St. James, and to this day
228   2,3,3  |              churches.~The Epistle of St. Apostle James was reserved
229   2,3,3  |               cool. All this prompted St. James to~give them essential,
230   2,3,3  |        Epistle.~The second chapter of St. Apostle James’s Epistle
231   2,3,3  |              Chrismation.~Epistles of St. Apostle Peter.~Apostle
232   2,3,3  |           that brought him to Christ. St. Peter was married and had
233   2,3,3  |              known where, apparently, St. Peter wrote his~Epistle.
234   2,3,3  |           beloved disciple of Christ. St. John was the son of Galilean~
235   2,3,3  |          Although not naming himself, St. John speaks of~himself
236   2,3,3  |           Descent of the Holy Spirit, St. John continued to live
237   2,3,3  |             pillar (Gal. 2:9). He and St. Peter traveled to pray
238   2,3,3  |              himself in his Epistles, St. John writes about~himself
239   2,3,3  |             his greetings.~Epistle of St. Apostle Jude.~The author
240   2,3,3  |             after Christ’s Ascension, St. Jude’s apostolic service
241   2,3,3  |          verse 3) it can be seen that St. Jude’s concern was “common~
242   2,3,3  |               straightforward manner, St.~Jude states that he writes
243   2,3,3  |       Nicolaitans that are exposed by St. John in the 2nd and 3rd
244   2,3,3  |   manifestations of God’s judgements,~St. Jude would not have failed
245   2,3,3  |               after~Peter’s, and that St. Jude took advantage of
246   2,3,3  |                Jude took advantage of St. Peter’s descriptive characteristics
247   2,3,3  |                The General Epistle of St. Jude is made up of one
248   2,4,4  |              more detailed account of St. Paul’s many faceted~Christian
249   2,5,1  |           Greek, means revelation) of St. John the Theologian is~
250   2,5,1  |           been inspired by God. Thus, St. Dionysius of Alexandria
251   2,5,2  |             of all the Apostles, only St. John the Theologian was
252   2,5,2  |       authorship of the Apocalypse by St. John the Theologian is
253   2,5,2  |              Holy Apostle's writings. St. John, being a~Jew by birth
254   2,5,2  |               love and contemplation.~St. John's disciple St. Papias
255   2,5,2  |    contemplation.~St. John's disciple St. Papias of Hierapolis refers
256   2,5,2  |     importance is also the opinion of St. Justin Martyr, who lived
257   2,5,2  |          God-inspired book written by St. John the Theologian. One
258   2,5,2  |           Theologian. One of them was St. Hippolytus,~a Roman pope
259   2,5,2  |               Origen also acknowledge St. John as the author~of the
260   2,5,2  |         attributing the Apocalypse to St. John~the Theologian, places
261   2,5,2  |           authorship as being that of~St. John the Theologian because
262   2,5,2  |           John the Theologian because St. Irenaeus was a student
263   2,5,2  |             Irenaeus was a student of St. Polycarp of Smyrna, who
264   2,5,2  |              in~turn was a student of St. John the Theologian, heading,
265   2,5,3  |           first century.~For example, St. Irenaeus writes as follows: “
266   2,5,3  |             time~mention the exile of St. John to Patmos for witnessing
267   2,5,3  |        churches of Asia Minor to whom St. John directed his letters
268   2,5,3  |          Evidently, the activities of St. John, who had spent a~long
269   2,5,3  |              lines of the Apocalypse, St. John indicates the purpose
270   2,5,3  |            parts~of the Roman Empire. St. John the Theologian, having
271   2,5,3  |       unscathed. Domitian then exiled St. John to~the island of Patmos,
272   2,5,4  |             persecutions and sorrows. St. John discloses the common
273   2,5,4  |               is due to the fact that St. John contemplated the fate
274   2,5,4  |               world, are~described by St. John as though they had
275   2,5,4  |               at war with each other. St. John, through~his visions,
276   2,5,5  |              the first century. After St. Paul's martyric death in
277   2,5,5  |              around the year 67 A.D., St. John the Theologian took
278   2,5,5  |              on the~Island of Patmos, St. John wrote letters from
279   2,5,5  |             of the Lord Jesus Christ. St. John writes~of events of
280   2,5,5  |             place in Ephesus. Just as~St. John predicted, the light
281   2,5,6  |          Heavenly Liturgy.~(Chs. 4-5)~St. John received the Revelation
282   2,5,6  |          Heavenly Divine Liturgy that St. John describes in the fourth
283   2,5,6  |          world.~Among the saints whom St. John sees in Heaven, two
284   2,5,6  |              of the early ones.~Later St. John sees an innumerable
285   2,5,6  |             of the fate of the world, St. John’s Apocalypse slowly
286   2,5,8  |               the beginning of these, St. John sees an angel conferring
287   2,5,8  |               the onset of calamities St. John sees the saints ardently
288   2,5,8  |             still fresh in the memory St. John. This war had~three
289   2,5,8  |             allegorical meaning. Thus St. Paul explains: “For we
290   2,5,8  |              of the two witnesses for St. John.~Evidently, the two
291   2,5,9  |             those who were baptized). St.~Paul called the Galatian
292   2,5,9  |         Fathers, the war~described by St. John occurred in the angelic
293   2,5,9  |             of many contemporaries of St. John that the slain Nero~
294   2,5,0  |          remained faithful to Christ, St. John directs~their vision
295   2,5,0  |         extravagance of~the “harlot,” St. John imagined rich Rome
296   2,5,1  |               and the devil (ch. 20), St. John does not follow a~
297   2,5,1  |            the devil.) In that order, St. John narrates~regarding
298   2,5,1  |             method of presentation by St. John~needs to be taken
299   2,5,2  |               this brief description, St. John concludes the writing