Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

 1   1,1,5  |      response to God it is also an interpretation of the message received
 2   1,1,6  |           version in favor of this interpretation. In the 14th Century, the
 3   1,1,6  |            in a literal sense, the interpretation ~suffers through the sheer
 4   1,5,5  |            be fulfilled, and their interpretation should be tentative, with
 5   1,5,5  |            how Daniel finished his interpretation of the dream: ~ ~.Thou sawest
 6   1,5,7  |        scripture~is of any private interpretation. For the prophecy came not
 7   1,Add,0|                     Revelation and Interpretation.~ ~Archpriest Georgy Florovsky ~ ~
 8   1,Add,0|           15). The Scriptures need interpretation. Not the phrasing, but the ~
 9   1,Add,0|         There is always some human interpretation in any Scriptural presen-~
10   1,Add,0|           called the .typological. interpretation. Patristic ~terminology
11   1,Add,0|          themselves, but rather an interpretation of the events. It was an ~
12   1,Add,1|             That the trend of the ~interpretation of the prophets and the
13   1,Add,1|             in fact, the authentic interpretation of Scripture. And in ~this
14   1,Add,1|        What was the prin-~ciple of interpretation? Now, in the Second century
15   1,Add,1|         ultimate ~warrant of right interpretation. The Church was not an external
16   1,Add,1|            in the ~exegesis. .Real interpretation of Scripture is Church preaching,
17   1,Add,1|          an ultimate .principle of interpretation,. opposing the .ecclesiastical
18   1,Add,1|       Church.s Faith as a Canon of interpretation. The Arians are blind to
19   1,Add,1|            purpose of exegesis and interpretation was to elicit the meaning
20   1,Add,1|       teach to present not our own interpretation ~but that of the Holy Spirit (
21   1,Add,1|        Origen insisted on catholic interpretation of Scripture, as it is ~
22   1,Add,1|         Church, lest by a perverse interpretation of the Gospel of Christ,
23   1,Add,1| indispensable princi-~ple of sound interpretation. Actually, the sentence
24   2,1,2  |          benedictions, reading and~interpretation of the law, reading and
25   2,1,2  |            of the law, reading and interpretation of the prophets, sermon,
26   2,2,2  |        Scripture is of any private interpretation, for~prophecy never came
27   2,2,5  |       themselves a single unity in~interpretation of God’s truth, the gospels
28   2,4,4  |            tongues, to another the interpretation of~tongues. But one and
29   2,5,4  |           of the~time. In one such interpretation, for instance, the pope
30   2,5,4  |          Apocalypse.~The method of interpretation of the Apocalypse is shown
31   2,5,5  |            a new and more in-depth interpretation of Old Testament history,~
32   2,5,5  |           a perilous threat of its interpretation in Gnostic terms and the
33   2,5,1  |            rather uses a method of interpretation according to a principle,