Part, Chapter, Paragraph

 1 1, 0,5 |  appearance of God’s Angel to the priest Zacharias during the church
 2 1, 1,2 |           was serving as the High priest when the Angel appeared
 3 1, 1,2 |            This is where the High priest was allowed to enter once
 4 1, 1,2 |       that Zacharias was the High priest. Consequently, a more plausible
 5 2, 0,7 |      Caiaphas: actually, the high priest was Caiaphas, and his father-in-law
 6 2, 1,2 |          also represents the High Priest, Who celebrates Himself
 7 3, 0,16|         afflicted with leprosy. A priest should investigate and unearth
 8 3, 0,16|           and show himself to the priest, ie. to fulfil the Law of
 9 3, 0,16|      leper to show himself to the priest “as a testimony to them”
10 3, 0,16|            in the sense that, the priest had to (according to the
11 4, 0,21|           and asked Ahimelech the priest to give him 5 breads or
12 4, 0,21|       whatever he could find. The priest gave him some bread that
13 4, 1,3 |       members, presided by a high priest. To call someone “raca”
14 4, 1,3 |  important matters. When the high priest exclaimed: “I put You under
15 4, 1,3 |         know that during the high priest Annas’s interrogation, Christ
16 4, 1,11|          leper to appear before a priest so that he - in accordance
17 4, 1,11|          to go immediately to the priest and appear before him.~Some
18 4, 1,11|          gone to Jerusalem to the priest, but instead started to
19 5, 0,41|           the temple, the serving priest and the people went to the
20 5, 0,41|         well of Siloam, where the priest filled a golden vessel with
21 5, 0,48| subsequently ignored by a passing priest and Levite, and only saw
22 5, 0,48|    Samaritan knew better than the priest or Levite, that in order
23 5, 0,48|           thieves,” just like the priest and Levite, even though
24 5, 0,83|        them, Caiaphas, being high priest that year” — this doesn’
25 5, 0,83|        with such an unworthy high priest as Caiapha. While Caiapha
26 6, 3,1 |          in the house of the high priest Caiaphas, namely in his
27 6, 3,1 |     son-in-law of the former high priest Anna or Annanas, who was
28 6, 4,6 |        Lord’s reading of the high priest prayer had been concluded.
29 6, 5   |           who was the ruling high priest for that year — as Annas (
30 6, 5   |       relative of the ruling high priest. Aside from this, the wily
31 6, 5   |       replaced as the ruling high priest, Annas continued to live
32 6, 5   |        especially as the new high priest was his close relative.
33 6, 5   |        large dwelling of the high priest.~In complementing the first
34 6, 5   |          he was known to the high priest, even though it is unknown
35 6, 5   |           entered inside the high priest’s courtyard, and then told
36 6, 5   |    apparently to impress the high priest — hit the Lord on the cheek
37 6, 5   |            Do You answer the high priest like that?” Had Jesus endured
38 6, 5   |           bound Jesus to the high priest Caiaphas (verse 24). Apparently,
39 6, 5   |        Son of God. “Then the high priest tore his clothes, saying, “
40 6, 5   |          was forbidden for a high priest to tear his clothing (Lev.
41 6, 5,1 |       inner courtyard of the high priest’s dwelling. The doorkeeper
42 6, 5,1 |         who was known to the high priest brought him there. The fact
43 6, 5,1 |        same courtyard of the high priest’s dwelling, where Annas
44 6, 5,1 |          The Lord’s trial by high priest Caiaphas was coming to a
45 6, 6,1 |         the courtyard of the high priest, being humiliated by the
46 6, 6,1 |          and servants of the high priest, the Lord was brought here.
47 6, 7,3 |         apparently was a rostered priest, who witnessed this miraculous