Table of Contents | Words: Alphabetical - Frequency - Inverse - Length - Statistics | Help | IntraText Library
Alphabetical    [«  »]
dangerous 4
dangers 1
dani 1
daniel 83
daniyye 1
daring 1
darius 5
Frequency    [«  »]
86 into
85 13
84 man
83 daniel
83 our
83 probably
79 prophetic
H.L. Ellison”
Old Testament prophets

IntraText - Concordances

daniel

   Chapter, Paragraph
1 1,1 | Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel and Daniel) and the twelve Minor Prophets.~ 2 1,1 | reasons for the omission of Daniel, which belongs to the Writings, 3 1,1 | apocalyptic visions we find in Daniel.~ The distinction between 4 1,5 | little of the later (not Daniel) is written in poetry should 5 6,8 | into Jerusalem. The prophet Daniel also prophesied about the 6 11,0| for his old age one like Daniel would have made for him! 7 13,2| be saved (14:12-23). For Daniel see p. 142; note that the 8 13,2| the same as in the book of Daniel.~ The warning is reinforced 9 13,3| normally called apocalyptic.~ Daniel was a prophet (Matt. 24: 10 13,3| last, as represented by Daniel, quite understandably and 11 13,3| Prophets.~ The place of Daniel in the Jewish canon is widely 12 15,4| comparable with those in Daniel. Efforts to see in them 13 15,4| vision with 6:1-8, with Daniel or Revelation. All the peoples 14 15,4| 1:8). Any linking with Daniel is far-fetched, and while 15 17 | Chapter 17.~Daniel. ~ ~ 16 17,1| The Structure of Daniel. ~ A. The PresentGhs. 17 17,1| of Israel.~ ~We deal with Daniel last because both the Hebrew 18 17,1| strict sense of the word.~ Daniel, with its stress on the 19 17,1| non-historical nature of Daniel for granted.~ The results 20 17,2| modern view see HDB, article Daniel, Book of; Driver, LOT, ch. 21 17,2| Against see ISBE, article Daniel, Book of; Young, ch. XXIV; 22 17,2| XXIV; Lattey: The Book of Daniel and the Bibliography.). 23 17,2| attributed his visions to Daniel to get his message, in whose 24 17,2| to be as early as Ezra” (Daniel (The Century Bible), p. 25 17,2| attribute the narrative part of Daniel to the fifth century B.C., 26 17,3| in 2:4 dp not mean that Daniel spoke in that language — 27 17,3| for the present form of Daniel would have made the transfer 28 17,4| When did Daniel enter the Canon? ~ Most 29 17,4| laid by the opponents of Daniel’s author­ship on the fact 30 17,4| unintelligible; in addition, Daniel never had the stand­ing 31 17,4| recognized as inspired.~ That Daniel circulated in inferior MSS. 32 17,4| is not inconsistent with Daniel’s position; he probably 33 17,5| done, the real objection to Daniel is its miraculous element, 34 17,5| can only be removed from Daniel by doing violence to its 35 17,5| forget that the narratives of Daniel receive their endorsement 36 17,6| Testament endorsement of Daniel that is really fatal to 37 17,6| does justify the means. If Daniel is a second-century work, 38 17,6| was completely deceived by Daniel!~ To make matters worse, 39 17,6| written in 1864, “The book of Daniel is … either divine or an 40 17,6| or an imposture” (Pusey: Daniel the Prophet, p. 1.) It is 41 17,7| Daniel the Man. ~ If not of royal 42 17,7| If not of royal blood, Daniel belonged to one of the best 43 17,7| families, probably as hostages, Daniel among them. The story creates 44 17,7| fourteen.~ It seems likely that Daniel was made a eunuch (see 1: 45 17,7| conquered Babylon (539 B.C). Daniel was an old man of over eighty, 46 17,7| was thrown to the lions. Daniel’s age is sufficient explanation 47 17,7| we have no knowledge of Daniel apart from his book. The 48 17,7| autobiography. The stories of Daniel and his friends are told 49 17,7| God over the future. Not Daniel and his friends, but the 50 17,8| The Stories of Daniel. ~ Once the real purpose 51 17,8| purpose of the narratives in Daniel has been grasped, only a 52 17,8| been little or no harm in Daniel and his friends eating this 53 17,8| favourite god. The absence of Daniel need cause no surprise, 54 17,8| The versions, and indeed Daniel’s own explanation, create 55 17,9| number of the explanations of Daniel that have been seriously 56 17,9| exposition of the visions in Daniel.~ à) Daniel is a booksealed 57 17,9| the visions in Daniel.~ à) Daniel is a booksealed even to 58 17,9| exposition of the Book of Daniel must take into account, 59 17,9| it… (Lattey: The Book of Daniel, p. vii.). The fact that 60 17,9| would have us learn from Daniel for to-day. Though he may 61 17,9| that the chief purpose of Daniel to-day is to bring strength 62 17,0| nor is any attempt made in Daniel to link it with the visions. 63 17,1| ver. 9 should be noted. Daniel sees God as an old man, 64 17,1| R.V.).~ ~In the Prophet Daniel we also find more prophetic 65 17,1| Jews of the prophecy of Daniel (Mat. 8:20, 9:6, 12:40, 66 17,3| is the crucial chapter of Daniel. If in­deed we have here 67 17,3| prophecy of Jesus Christ, then Daniel is truly prophetic, and 68 17,3| 490 years).~ ~The Prophet Daniel wrote the prophecy of the 69 17,3| Jerusalem in 588 BC. The prophet Daniel knew, that the 70 year time 70 17,3| Holy City of Jerusalem, St. Daniel often began to ask God for 71 17,3| Gabriel said to the Prophet Daniel:~ ~“Seventy times seven “ 72 17,3| book. The enumeration of Daniel’s “weeks” should begin from 73 17,3| the time, indicated by St. Daniel. The Christian faith began 74 17,3| Archangel to the prophet Daniel, reigned “abomination of 75 17,3| the city. The prophecy of Daniel about the weeks comes to 76 17,3| countrymen to count the weeks of Daniel. The rabbi of Gemar even 77 17,3| understandable. For the Daniel weeks point directly to 78 17,4| Epiphanes a genuine prophecy of Daniel’s was worked over and paraphrased, 79 17,4| the book. In the days of Daniel very little dear teaching 80 17,4| the angels mentioned in Daniel cannot be decided from the 81 17,4| the sovereignty of God is Daniel’s chief theological interest, 82 17,5| the sixth century date of Daniel can refer to D. J. Wiseman 83 17,5| Problems in the Book of Daniel (Tyndale Press).~ ~ ~


Best viewed with any browser at 800x600 or 768x1024 on Tablet PC
IntraText® (V89) - Some rights reserved by EuloTech SRL - 1996-2007. Content in this page is licensed under a Creative Commons License