Chapter, Paragraph

 1 Intro |         it better if you use the R.V. I have only rarely pointed
 2 Intro |          differences between the R.V. and the A.V., but have
 3 Intro |            New Bible Dictionary~ R.S.V. — Revised Standard
 4 Intro |       Revised Standard Version.~ R.V. — Revised Version.~ Young —
 5 1,4   |        the prophets” (Amos 7:14, R.V. mg.).~ In contradistinction
 6 2,5   |  blessing (note tenses in 2:18f, R.V.). These verses (2:18-
 7 3,2   |        self-emptying (Phil. 2:7, R.V. — the “kenosis” theory)
 8 4,2   |          of the prophets” (7:14, R.V. mg.) goes beyond the
 9 4,3   |          21:6; 22:8, 9, 28 — cf. R.V. text and mg.). No distinction
10 4,6   |       understandable by men. The R.V. mg. in ver. 3 is correct.~
11 4,6   |         past. Siccuth and Chiun (R.V). are generally taken
12 5,2   |         of marginal notes in the R.V. testifies to difficulties
13 5,3   |         cf. Baal-peor (Num. 25:3,R.V.mg.), Baal-zebub (IIKings
14 5,3   |        38:21f, Deut. 23:17, both R.V. nig.). This led in turn
15 5,4   |          about his marriage (the R.V. mg. is preferable in
16 5,5   |          response of man’s love. R.S.V. renders steadfast love.~
17 5,7   |      carry real conviction — the R.S.V. is almost certainly
18 6,8   |     physically, cf. Judges 6:22 (R.V.), 13:22; ISam. 6:19;
19 6,8   |          in part (Rom. 11:7, 25, R.V.) came upon Israel because
20 6,1   |       being a Quisling (ver. 12, R. V.).~ The result was that
21 6,8   |         29 should be read in the R.V.~ The second woe deals
22 6,5   |         15f). Note carefully the R.V. mg. in 42:3f.~ The second
23 7,2   |          or Micaiah (Jer. 26:18, R.V.), was a native of Moresheth-gath (
24 7,3   |         purpose (For details see R.S.V. or Moffatt’s translation.).
25 7,5   |      present heathen world (read R.V. mg. in 4:5).~ The following
26 7,6   |     English chapter division (so R.S.V.) as against the R.V.,
27 7,6   |        so R.S.V.) as against the R.V., which follows the Hebrew
28 8,6   |     possible to justify both the R.V. text and mg. in ver.
29 9,3   |      Sennacherib; in ver. 12 the R.V. mg. should be followed.
30 10,5  |           3 to ver. 15 as in the R.V. mg.~ Though the first
31 11,5  |        was waking over them (see R.V. mg. for word-play). Much
32 11,8  |         A.V.), but “pour it out”(R.V.).~ Note that already
33 11,2  |          was uncircumcised). The R.V. should be con­sulted
34 11,2  |        in their uncircumcision” (R.V). means there is no circumcised
35 11,2  |        be missed nor made again (R.V. mg.), because that which
36 11,2  |          condemnation (8:8f, see R.V.). The scribes and the
37 11,4  |   Jeremiah was restrained (36:5, R.V., mg). from entering the
38 12,3  |         words in ver. 7; for the R.V. text see IISam. 3:21 (
39 12,3  |          21 (send away), for the R.V. mg. see Exod 6:1 (let
40 13,4  |          rebellious” (ver. 3, so R.Y.), i.e. both Judah and
41 13,7  |     people, the elders (ver. 11, R.V.).~ (c) The Canaanite
42 13,8  |       wresting of judgment (9:9, R.V.), based on the belief
43 13,8  |   Jehovah had forsaken the land (R.V. mg,). Then the coals
44 13,9  |         a little while (ver. 16, R.V.),1 and would then bring
45 13,0  |          him into exile (ver. 4, R.V. mg.). Then in the evening
46 13,6  |          great rusty caldron (so R.V). in which the contents
47 14,5  |          either render as in the R.V. or perhaps better “the
48 15,4  | craftsmen (both A.V. carpenters, R.V. smiths are too precise)
49 15,4  |       priests is a sign (ver. 8, R.V). of the future removal
50 15,4  |          the Messiah, the Shoot (R.V. mg , cf. 6:12 mg.; Isa.
51 15,5  |         We do not doubt that the R.V. mg. is correct in ver.
52 15,5  |  priest-king as expressed by the R.V. text.~ ~
53 15,7  |    probably better to follow the R.V. mg. in ver. 10. The reference
54 16,4  |         of hosts (ver. 7 — A.V., R.V. messenger; the context
55 16,4  |       her indecency in anything. R. Akiba says: Even if he
56 16,4  |      Angel of the covenant (3:2. R.V. mg.), i.e. the Angel
57 16,6  |          repentance (ver. 6, see R.V. mg). or the ban. In the
58 17,8  |         had to be continued. The R.V. is correct in its rendering
59 17,1  |         with the end times.~ The R.V. of ver. 9 should be noted.
60 17,1  |         Similarly in ver. 13 the R.V. is correct in rendering “
61 17,1  |     ancient of days (Rev. 1:13f, R.V.).~ ~In the Prophet Daniel
62 17,2  |       time of the end” (ver. 19, R.V.). Such an extension of
63 18,1  |     adopted by both the A.V. and R.V.; we should, however,
64 18,2  |    addition, as reference to the R.V. mg. will sometimes, but
65 18,3  |    obscured in the A.V., but the R.V. sets out the long lines,
66 18,3  |   alphabet. As translated by the R.V. the following verses
67 18,3  |         division of lines in the R.V. translation.~ Ch. 4 resembles
68 18,3  |       the faulty division in the R.V.~ Metrically ch. 3 is
69 18,3  |         verses (indicated by the R.V). in which each verse
70 18,4  |           see especially ver. 7, R.V. Jerusalem’s lovers (vers.
71 18,5  |         be more correct than the R.V., though its force might
72 18,7  |          iniquity. In ver. 7 the R.V. is probably correct in
73 18,7  |     should be rendered as in the R.V. margin:~ Unless thou