Chapter, Paragraph

 1 1,2 |    speaking the same spiritual language.~ The best picture of the
 2 1,5 | natural exuberance of Oriental language, but with the vivid metaphors
 3 2,4 |        even more hyper­bolical language, as they are seen against
 4 2,4 |      entirely unnecessary. The language, however exaggerated, can
 5 2,6 |        belongs to the symbolic language of apocalyptic. There is
 6 3,5 |     from drown­ing — hence the language of ver. 5f — which was for
 7 3,5 | ordinary fish.~ As regards the language of the psalm, there are
 8 4,8 |        he is using traditional language. Isaiah consistently uses
 9 5,2 |   testifies to difficulties in language and text. It is quite likely
10 6,2 |       into questions of style, language and theology. It will suffice
11 6,2 |      to note the difference in language between the two sections.
12 6,6 |      22 is far from easy. “The language of Canaan” is Hebrew, and
13 6,7 |        to the obscurity of the language, partly perhaps to its restriction
14 6,5 |    blended does justice to the language of the Servant Songs.~ The
15 6,0 |        city, but sometimes the language is more applicable to the
16 8,3 |       with the typically vague language of eschatology, where everything
17 8,4 |      concrete. The generalized language of 1:2f is replaced by the
18 9,1 |      very vividness of Nahum’s language and the splendour of his
19 10,5|    vers. 3-15 are based on the language of Deut. 33:2; Judges 5:
20 11,6|        In any case some of the language is quite unsuited to the
21 11,5|        unconscious, to use the language of modern psychology. Equally
22 13,4|       his mes­sage, though the language is certainly not optimistic.~
23 13,5|  exiles would oppose him — the language of ver. 25 is probably to
24 13,5|      symbolical element in the language used. Ezekiel’s dumbness
25 13,3|    will be a res­toration. The language of ver. 22f seems Messianic (
26 13,0|   People (Ch. 37).~ Though the language of the vision (vers. 1-14)
27 13,1|  keeping both with the general language of these chapters, and with
28 14,3|   self-interest. Certainly his language cannot be compared with
29 15,5|    think hirn the Messiah. The language always falls short of complete
30 16,4|   extracted from the prophet’s language.~ c) The most likely interpretation —
31 17,3|       has been proved that the language is compatible with the book’
32 17,3|       the words “in the Syrian language” in 2:4 dp not mean that
33 17,3|      that Daniel spoke in that language — for Babylonian was the
34 17,3|       Babylonian was the court language — but are merely a warning
35 17,3|        to the copyist that the language is changing. This change
36 17,3|       changing. This change of language sets a problem that has
37 17,3|      Aramaic, an international language, is used because these chapters
38 17,8|     cause no surprise, for the language of 3:2f must not be stressed.
39 17,1|      of man.” This is symbolic language, for ver. 27 clearly equates
40 17,3|      the fairer, for while the language of vers. 24-27 is cryptic,
41 17,3|         which makes it fit the language of Dan. 9:25.~ c) Those