Chapter, Paragraph

 1 1,5 |          exception and there is no evidence for this after the exile.
 2 1,6 |            will really satisfy the evidence offered by Jeremiah, except
 3 1,6 |          ch. VI in considering the evidence for the author­ship of Isaiah
 4 1,6 |        With Ezekiel there is every evidence that the prophet looked
 5 1,7 |            8-13, there is no clear evidence that Nebuchadnezzar ever
 6 1,7 |       explanatory comment is ample evidence that the prophet thought
 7 2,2 |            Joel. From the internal evidence of the book itself we are
 8 2,5 |           Unless, therefore, other evidence can be found, it would be
 9 4,6 |       overtaken them were the best evidence that God had rejected their
10 6,4 |           Isaiah. ~ There is every evidence that Isaiah was a native
11 6,6 |           In vers. 4-9 we have the evidence for the prosecution; as
12 6,9 |              Few who quote 7:14 as evidence for the virgin birth of
13 6,1 |          open idolatry there is no evidence. It is better to suppose
14 7,2 |            we have interpreted the evidence correctly, then we must
15 9,1 |         based less on the internal evidence than on a widespread dislike
16 9,2 |  acknowledge that there is no real evidence in their favour. Nahum’s
17 9,3 |       textual study, including the evidence of the older copy of Isaiah
18 11,4|           priest, nor is there any evidence that he would have done
19 11,4|         contrary, there is no real evidence that Jeremiah helped in
20 11,4| probability to Baruch. There is no evidence, however, that Baruch was
21 11,0|      Jerusalem; and there is every evidence that this was heightened
22 11,1|         received a fair trial. The evidence that saved him (26:17ff)
23 11,1|        saved him (26:17ff) was the evidence of similar prophesying by
24 11,1|           Micah (3:12). Though the evidence follows the verdict (26:
25 11,1|           were part of the elders’ evidence. This is manifestly false.
26 11,6|            unshakable. There is no evidence that he had come to understand
27 12,1|          scribes accepted that the evidence pointed to its use by Jeremiah (
28 13,8|       increasing popularity was no evidence that the majority of the
29 13,3|            canon is widely used as evidence that it must have been written
30 17,3|            inconceivable; but what evidence there is hardly supports
31 17,4|           of time. We have similar evidence for the Old Testament, for
32 17,6|            best known. There is no evidence known to us that the ascriptions
33 17,9|             There is not even much evidence that students of prophecy
34 17,1|           image in ch. 2. The only evidence for this supposition is
35 17,1|           also find more prophetic evidence about the Messiah, written
36 18,1|            and so borne out by the evidence of the book, that we do