Chapter, Paragraph

 1 3,7 |        3:10). It offended his sense of what God should do (4:
 2 5,5 |  using the word in the widest sense. It is clear that matters
 3 6,4 |    disappear, but even in one sense Israel; now we read of Zion
 4 6,5 |  there is no apparent loss in sense. The effect of this isolation
 5 6,4 |      possible by ignoring the sense of the passage.~ ~
 6 8,6 |    people” best expresses the sense of the Hebrew.~ The book
 7 9,3 |       Faced with this, common sense is likely to decide that
 8 9,3 |       be followed. To get the sense we should omit 1:13, 15;
 9 10,4|    acts that contravene man’s sense of the fitness of things.~
10 11,7|     in contrast to Judah. Its sense has been obscured by a wrong
11 13,0|   about the land in a literal sense, it should be obvious that
12 14,1|   striking that he reveals no sense of loss at the lack of genuine
13 14,3|   blessing (2:15-19) is in no sense a bribe. It is part of Haggai’
14 14,3|      It may very well be this sense of spiritual logic rather
15 14,4|    this does not seem to make sense. The simplest explanation
16 14,5|   only Messianic in the wider sense. The A.V. rendering “the
17 15,6|      of them was questionable sense — ritual often paralyses
18 15,6| ritual often paralyses common sense and is maintained long after
19 16,4|       in their true spiritual sense, ine phrase “wife of thy
20 17,1|    the Prophets in the strict sense of the word.~ Daniel, with
21 17,8|     minas), which made little sense (a mina was 60 or 50 shekels.).~ ~
22 17,1|   clearly used in a Messianic sense. It is to be noted that
23 18,6|       separated from God by a sense of guilt and the destruction
24 18,0|   sacrifices; not only in the sense that they have lost their