Chapter, Paragraph

 1 3,2 |            The uncertainty as to authorship need not affect our view
 2 6,2 |         prejudge the question of authorship — is closed by four historical
 3 6,2 |   suggest possible difference in authorship; the similarities demand
 4 6,2 | traditional view of the isaianic authorship of the whole prophecy. It
 5 6,3 |     having accepted the Isaianic authorship of the whole book, we are
 6 6,3 |       The acceptance of Isaianic authorship explains one feature of “
 7 6,0 |      Once we accept the Isaianic authorship of the whole book, Isaiah
 8 6,7 |          made that the theory of authorship of “Deutero-Isaiah” given
 9 6,7 |         disproved the com­posite authorship of Isaiah. The older MS
10 6,7 |          older view of composite authorship, it could only be disproved
11 13,1|   generally accepted problems of authorship, as in Isaiah. Still less
12 15,2|                   The Problem of Authorship. ~ That Zechariah falls
13 15,2|   anonymous prophecies — for the authorship of Malachi see ch. XVI —
14 15,3|          strong argument against authorship by Zechariah of these chapters).~
15 17,2|       who reject the traditional authorship are agreed that the book
16 17,6|          that the ascriptions of authorship in these books were taken
17 18,1|       collection is not based on authorship, but on the order in which
18 18,1|     first and the second temple. Authorship.~ The book is anonymous,
19 18,1|     traditions, like that of the authorship of the Gospel according
20 18,3|        to accept the traditional authorship. We are not dealing here
21 18,9|          is a question merely of authorship. For those who held it,
22 18,9|         the “fact” of Jeremiah’s authorship of Lamentations was sufficient