Chapter, Paragraph

 1 Intro |         in a deeper study of the text of the Prophets. They do
 2 4,3   |           22:8, 9, 28 — cf. R.V. text and mg.). No distinction
 3 5,2   |     difficulties in language and text. It is quite likely that
 4 6,8   |          and the parallel Gospel text:~ ~7th verse: “All that
 5 7,6   |          the prophet’s own time; text implies the social evils
 6 7,7   |         Jordan; some part of the text has been accidentally dropped.~
 7 8,6   |         to justify both the R.V. text and mg. in ver. 10, neither
 8 9,3   |       con­nected with the Hebrew text that we must avoid. On the
 9 9,3   |       Roberts: The Old Testament Text and Versions.).~ Though
10 11,2  |   differences between the Hebrew text and the LXX afford grounds
11 11,6  |       suggests strongly that the text of ver. 11 is corrupt, while
12 12,3  |          in ver. 7; for the R.V. text see IISam. 3:21 (send away),
13 13,4  |         of re-arrangement of the text seems to be demanded. It
14 13,7  |       nose) — the present Hebrew text “their nose” is according
15 13,8  | survivors (ver. 21). [The Hebrew text says that it was about eighteen
16 15,5  |         as expressed by the R.V. text.~ ~
17 17,9  |         of uncertainty about the text, and even more about the