Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

 1 Intro, A,8|     arguments based on~reason. In theology, attention is also given
 2 Intro, A,9|        who~summed up the Orthodox theology of the great patristic age.)~
 3 Intro, A,9|     garment~of truth woven of the theology from above, rightly dispenseth
 4 Intro, B,1|         and the Holy~Fathers. The theology of the Russian Church also
 5 Intro, B,2|        call a “system~of dogmatic theology.” A complete dogmatic system,
 6 Intro, B,2|        very valuable for Orthodox theology,~was compiled in the eighth
 7 Intro, B,2|        complete works of dogmatic theology were written in~the nineteenth
 8 Intro, B,2|         Moscow (Orthodox Dogmatic Theology, two~volumes), by Philaret,
 9 Intro, B,2|      Chernigov (Orthodox Dogmatic Theology, in two parts), by~Bishop
10 Intro, B,2|        Essay in Orthodox Dogmatic Theology,~With an Historical Exposition
11 Intro, B,2|     Malinovsky~(Orthodox Dogmatic Theology, four volumes, and A Sketch
12 Intro, B,2|       Sketch of Orthodox Dogmatic Theology in~two parts), and by Archpriest
13 Intro, B,2|      century Russian “systems” of theology have been out of fashion
14 Intro, B,2|           is that~the division of theology into “categories,” its “
15 Intro, B,2|          of the subject-matter of theology. Father~Michael himself
16 Intro, B,2|         defended these systems of theology for their usefulness in
17 Intro, B,2|      their usefulness in teaching theology in~the schools against accusations
18 Intro, C  |                       C. Dogmatic Theology~The dogmatic labor of the
19 Intro, C  |           in the name of dogmatic theology itself — to reveal new Christian
20 Intro, C  |        place. The aim of dogmatic theology as a branch of learning
21 Intro, C  |        complete works of dogmatic theology set forth the thinking of
22 Intro, C  |        Essay in Orthodox~Dogmatic Theology by Bishop Sylvester is arranged
23 Intro, C  |         of exposition in Orthodox theology does not have the aim of
24 Intro, C  |         which had been forgotten. Theology naturally~takes into consideration
25 Intro, C  |           development of dogmatic theology as a~branch of learning.
26 Intro, C,1|     Dogmatics and faith.~Dogmatic theology is for the believing Christian.
27 Intro, C,1|          it is the cornerstone of theology. “But these are written,
28 Intro, C,2|                                   Theology, Science and Philosophy.~
29 Intro, C,2|            The difference between theology and the natural sciences,
30 Intro, C,2|         by the fact that dogmatic theology is founded upon living and~
31 Intro, C,2|        human creativity; while in theology the~deductions come from
32 Intro, C,2|           difference also between theology and philosophy. Philosophy
33 Intro, C,2|          questions of life; while theology isfounded upon Divine Revelation.
34 Intro, C,2|        They must not be confused; theology is not philosophy even~when
35 Intro, C,2|          difficult~to understand.~Theology does not deny either the
36 Intro, C,2|            The course of dogmatic theology is divided into two basic
37 I, 2,7    |    dogmatic work~of the doctor of theology, A. Sanda, we read: “Opponents (
38 I, 2,11   |           Second Part of Dogmatic Theology.~When man's mind is directed
39 I, 2,11   |         The final aim of Dogmatic Theology in its Second Part is the
40 II, 3,2   |      trying to penetrate into our theology through one of the~contemporary
41 II, 3,6   |            quoted in~the Dogmatic Theology of Metr. Macarius, Vol.
42 II, 3,6   |        formation.~(Roman Catholic theology is decisively inclined toward
43 II, 3,6   |          in his~Orthodox Dogmatic Theology: “As the image of God, the
44 II, 4,2   |        Essay in Orthodox Dogmatic Theology, vol. 3, p. 379).~But no
45 II, 5,3   |           in particular.~Orthodox theology does not accept the extreme
46 II, 5,3   |          are accepted by Orthodox theology differently.~After his first
47 II, 5,3   |      spiritual, as Roman Catholic theology teaches. Many sinful inclinations,~
48 II, 5,3   |         is understood by Orthodox theology as a sinful inclination
49 II, 6,4   |     teaching was deduced in Roman theology from the Roman dogma of
50 II, 6,6   |        given to it in the Western theology of the Middle Ages. The
51 II, 6,6   |           medieval Roman Catholic theology in their literal and~overly-narrow
52 II, 6,6   |         the reigning one in Latin theology and~it has remained so up
53 II, 6,6   |          used in Russian Orthodox theology, but in a changed form:~“
54 II, 6,7   |           The systems of dogmatic theology, following the ancient custom,
55 II, 6,8   |           new section of Dogmatic~Theology . that concerning the Church
56 II, 7,2   |            These are~called moral theology and ascetic theology.~Dogmatic
57 II, 7,2   |        moral theology and ascetic theology.~Dogmatic Theology proper
58 II, 7,2   |        ascetic theology.~Dogmatic Theology proper limits the subject
59 II, 8,5   |          bread and wine. Orthodox theology, however, does not try to “
60 II, 9,5   |          in his Orthodox Dogmatic Theology).~Among the numerous depictions
61 II, 0,1   |         The last part of~dogmatic theology thus speaks about the culmination
62 II, 0,2   |          in his Orthodox~Dogmatic Theology remarks: “One must firmly
63 Add, 0,3  |       topic of Orthodox Christian theology: it is not a dogma of~the
64 Add, 0,4  | Historical Exposition of~Orthodox Theology,” by Bishop Sylvester, Vol.
65 Add, 0,4  |       sphere of Orthodox dogmatic theology.~As for the toll-houses,
66 Add, 0,4  |     writers of general systems of theology limit themselves to a rather
67 Add, 0,4  |         Moscow, Orthodox Dogmatic Theology, Saint Petersburg, 1883,
68 Add, 0,4  |           volume work on dogmatic theology, does not comment on this
69 Add, 0,7  |           the subject of dogmatic theology, the duty of which~is to
70 Add, 0,7  |           long course in dogmatic theology: “Grantto us, O Lord, to
71 Add, 0,7  |          ages” (Orthodox Dogmatic Theology, vol. 2, p. 674).~
72 App, 1    |     really touch on philosophy or theology,~remaining a movement primarily
73 App, 1    |        more as philosophy than as theology.~Soloviev by his literary
74 App, 1    |        began to be expressed that theology should not fear new revelations,
75 App, 1    |          us to ask: Does dogmatic theology, in its~usual form, satisfy
76 App, 1    |      accepted~systems of dogmatic theology gives every opportunity
77 App, 1    |       simple world-view. Dogmatic theology, built on the foundation
78 App, 1    |         are inseparable.~Dogmatic theology does not pretend to satisfy
79 App, 1    |         broaden the boundaries of theology, whether on a~mystical or
80 App, 1    |         path of philosophizing in theology, do not harmonize with the~
81 App, 1    |          to development. Dogmatic theology can use~various methods;
82 App, 1    |           learning (as opposed to theology proper) is an outward~subject
83 App, 1    |           other decrees. Dogmatic theology as a branch of learning
84 App, 2    |                    Philosophy and Theology.~Into contemporary theological
85 App, 2    |           that Christian dogmatic~theology should be supplemented,
86 App, 2    |   writings.~And this was natural. Theology and philosophy are distinguished
87 App, 2    |     Therefore,~Christian dogmatic theology has as its chief object
88 App, 2    |         it. In its basic content, theology is soteriological (from~
89 App, 2    |           are treated by dogmatic theology in a very~limited way. This
90 App, 2    |            and Orthodox~Christian theology as a whole has followed
91 App, 2    |      These two spheres — dogmatic theology and philosophy —are likewise
92 App, 2    |         our~faith in their truth. Theology gathers and studies the
93 App, 2    |     proceeds not from faith, like theology, but seeks to~base itself
94 App, 2    |         two spheres of knowledge, theology~and philosophy. Thus is
95 App, 2    |      distinction between dogmatic~theology and Christian philosophy,
96 App, 3    |  theophanies.~3. The attention of theology according to Soloviev is