Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

 1 Intro, A,6|   Ecumenical Councils~confirmed the dogmatic decrees of a number of local
 2 Intro, A,6|        local councils, and also the dogmatic statements~composed by certain
 3 Intro, A,6|            of the Church made their dogmatic decrees a) after a careful,
 4 Intro, A,6|             councils.~Among all the dogmatic decrees of councils, the
 5 Intro, A,8|     teaching and created a unity of dogmatic language; 2) added testimonies
 6 Intro, A,9|             ourselves~firmer in the dogmatic teaching of the Orthodox
 7 Intro, B,2|                                     Dogmatic systems.~The attempt at
 8 Intro, B,2|       teaching we call a “system~of dogmatic theology.” A complete dogmatic
 9 Intro, B,2|      dogmatic theology.” A complete dogmatic system, very valuable for
10 Intro, B,2|          the most complete works of dogmatic theology were written in~
11 Intro, B,2|        Macarius of Moscow (Orthodox Dogmatic Theology, two~volumes),
12 Intro, B,2|   Archbishop of Chernigov (Orthodox Dogmatic Theology, in two parts),
13 Intro, B,2|          Academy (Essay in Orthodox Dogmatic Theology,~With an Historical
14 Intro, B,2|             N. Malinovsky~(Orthodox Dogmatic Theology, four volumes,
15 Intro, B,2|            and A Sketch of Orthodox Dogmatic Theology in~two parts),
16 Intro, C  |                                  C. Dogmatic Theology~The dogmatic labor
17 Intro, C  |            C. Dogmatic Theology~The dogmatic labor of the Church has
18 Intro, C  |       individuals or in the name of dogmatic theology itself — to reveal
19 Intro, C  |            out of~place. The aim of dogmatic theology as a branch of
20 Intro, C  |           Certain complete works of dogmatic theology set forth the thinking
21 Intro, C  |   above-mentioned Essay in Orthodox~Dogmatic Theology by Bishop Sylvester
22 Intro, C  |            them, and sets forth the dogmatic~truths accordingly. In this
23 Intro, C  |            about the development of dogmatic theology as a~branch of
24 Intro, C,1|                Dogmatics and faith.~Dogmatic theology is for the believing
25 Intro, C,2|         made clear by the fact that dogmatic theology is founded upon
26 Intro, C,2|           Homily 22).~The course of dogmatic theology is divided into
27 I, 1,5    |             This is why there is no dogmatic value to be found in the
28 I, 1,9    |          have tried~to overturn the dogmatic foundations of Orthodoxy.
29 I, 2,3    |          God is given here not in a dogmatic formula, but in~an account
30 I, 2,4    |             the ancient period, the dogmatic aim of the Church was to
31 I, 2,7    |        Orthodox East is backward in dogmatic development, that one must
32 I, 2,7    |       implicite). However, in Latin dogmatic~works, intended for internal
33 I, 2,7    |           officially approved Latin dogmatic work~of the doctor of theology,
34 I, 2,7    |            the inviolability of the~dogmatic formula, “proceedeth from
35 I, 2,7    |             Trinity.~Apart from the dogmatic side, by introducing a new
36 I, 2,8    |            of the Church, the chief dogmatic work of the Holy Fathers
37 I, 2,11   |    Transition to the Second Part of Dogmatic Theology.~When man's mind
38 I, 2,11   |         salvation.~The final aim of Dogmatic Theology in its Second Part
39 II, 3,6   |           creatures” (quoted in~the Dogmatic Theology of Metr. Macarius,
40 II, 3,6   |             it thus in his~Orthodox Dogmatic Theology: “As the image
41 II, 4,2   |     Sylvester,~An Essay in Orthodox Dogmatic Theology, vol. 3, p. 379).~
42 II, 5,3   |         theologian, suggests in his dogmatic~volumes that the latter
43 II, 6,3   |            refuses to recognize the dogmatic decrees~of the Ecumenical
44 II, 6,4   |          them the significance of a~dogmatic source. The Church, accepting
45 II, 6,7   |             the Lord~The systems of dogmatic theology, following the
46 II, 6,8   |         subject of a new section of Dogmatic~Theology . that concerning
47 II, 7,2   |      theology and ascetic theology.~Dogmatic Theology proper limits the
48 II, 7,5   |        temporary divisions of a non dogmatic~nature. Differences between
49 II, 7,6   |           is present an undistorted dogmatic teaching. Such an understanding~
50 II, 9,5   |            Macarius in his Orthodox Dogmatic Theology).~Among the numerous
51 II, 9,7   |            power of the Church.~The dogmatic teaching of the Church has
52 II, 9,7   |          kind of departure from the dogmatic~truths leads to an incorrect
53 II, 0,1   |      eternal life. The last part of~dogmatic theology thus speaks about
54 II, 0,2   |            Macarius in his Orthodox~Dogmatic Theology remarks: “One must
55 Add, 0,4  |         into the sphere of Orthodox dogmatic theology.~As for the toll-houses,
56 Add, 0,4  |    Metropolitan of Moscow, Orthodox Dogmatic Theology, Saint Petersburg,
57 Add, 0,4  |           in his two~volume work on dogmatic theology, does not comment
58 Add, 0,7  |     immediately into the subject of dogmatic theology, the duty of which~
59 Add, 0,7  |           end of his long course in dogmatic theology: “Grantto us, O
60 Add, 0,7  |             ages of~ages” (Orthodox Dogmatic Theology, vol. 2, p. 674).~
61 App, 1    |                     The question of dogmatic development.~The question
62 App, 1    |        development.~The question of dogmatic development has long been
63 App, 1    |           and~we do not expect, new dogmatic revelations.~Such a view
64 App, 1    |             view on the question of dogmatic development was present,
65 App, 1    |           to establish and sanction dogmatic propositions. In discussions~
66 App, 1    |             to oppose the arbitrary dogmatic~innovations made by the
67 App, 1    |             view on the~question of dogmatic development, the view which
68 App, 1    |            the establishment of new~dogmatic definitions.In the 1880'
69 App, 1    |             desiring to justify the dogmatic development of the~Roman
70 App, 1    |         development of the Church's dogmatic consciousness.~He argues
71 App, 1    |       raised: “Can one consider the dogmatic teaching of the Church already~
72 App, 1    |            the disputes concerning “dogmatic development.”~In Russian
73 App, 1    |           the circle of fundamental dogmatic~problems, so that dogmatics
74 App, 1    |         natural for us to ask: Does dogmatic theology, in its~usual form,
75 App, 1    |             the accepted~systems of dogmatic theology gives every opportunity
76 App, 1    |        clear and simple world-view. Dogmatic theology, built on the foundation
77 App, 1    |           on the foundation of firm~dogmatic truths, speaks of a Personal
78 App, 1    |            action, are inseparable.~Dogmatic theology does not pretend
79 App, 1    |           the precise definition~of dogmatic statements, in their clarification,
80 App, 1    |             the Church the scope of dogmatic truths always remains in
81 App, 1    |           the Church sanctions~some dogmatic statements which are Orthodox
82 App, 1    |            deny that thanks to such dogmatic definitions the content
83 App, 1    |             subject to development. Dogmatic theology can use~various
84 App, 1    |          work of the Church and~its dogmatic and other decrees. Dogmatic
85 App, 1    |         dogmatic and other decrees. Dogmatic theology as a branch of
86 App, 2    |             the view that Christian dogmatic~theology should be supplemented,
87 App, 2    |          mix together two spheres — dogmatic learning and~philosophy.
88 App, 2    |        Christ. Therefore,~Christian dogmatic theology has as its chief
89 App, 2    |       nature of man, are treated by dogmatic theology in a very~limited
90 App, 2    | manifestations.~These two spheres — dogmatic theology and philosophy —
91 App, 2    |         precise distinction between dogmatic~theology and Christian philosophy,
92 App, 5,3  |             Cephalonia, following a dogmatic explanation~of the Orthodox
93 App, 5,3  |           of the saints, contains a dogmatic explanation~followed by