Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

 1 Intro, A,5|    ancient traditions of rite and dogma — in particular, there is
 2 Intro, A,9|     Church, both in the sphere of dogma and of morals. This is~splendidly
 3 I         |        Part I.~God in Himself~The dogma of faith. Belief or faith
 4 I, 1,1    |                               The dogma of faith.~The first word
 5 I, 2      |                            2. The dogma of the Holy Trinity~
 6 I, 2,1    |        and triple in Persons. The dogma of the Trinity is the second~
 7 I, 2,1    |         is the second~fundamental dogma of Christianity. A whole
 8 I, 2,1    |          beginning first with the dogma of our Redemption. Because
 9 I, 2,1    |           the Church.~Because the dogma of the All-Holy Trinity
10 I, 2,1    |         intense as that over this dogma and the truths that are
11 I, 2,1    | immediately~bound up with it.~The dogma of the Holy Trinity includes
12 I, 2,1    |           mystical nature of this dogma, the Church of Christ sees
13 I, 2,1    |      non-Christian religions. The dogma of the Three Persons indicates~
14 I, 2,1    |         the Divine~Life also. The dogma of the Three Persons indicates
15 I, 2,4    |                               The dogma of the Holy Trinity in the
16 I, 2,4    |      battle in~the defense of the dogma of the Holy Trinity. The
17 I, 2,4    |       such precise words for this~dogma as could best protect the
18 I, 2,4    |         as could best protect the dogma of the Holy Trinity against
19 I, 2,5    |           Hebrews, 1:5; 5:5). The dogma of the procession of the
20 I, 2,5    |         the past participle.)~The dogma of the begetting of the
21 I, 2,7    |         became sharper, the Latin dogma~became increasingly strengthened
22 I, 2,7    |          a universally~obligatory dogma. Protestantism inherited
23 I, 2,7    |           Roman Church.~The Latin dogma of the Filioque is a substantial
24 I, 2,7    |         from Orthodox~truth. This dogma was subjected to a detailed
25 I, 2,7    |      rejection by Rome of its own dogma. At best, it is only a disguise
26 I, 2,7    |        backwardness, and that the dogma expressed in the West in
27 I, 2,7    |         concealed~in the Orthodox dogma in a still undeveloped form (
28 I, 2,7    |         treatment of the Orthodox dogma~of the procession of the
29 I, 2,7    |         1916).~However, the Latin dogma agrees neither with Sacred
30 I, 2,7    |         two dogmas — that is,~the dogma of the personal existence
31 I, 2,7    |         of the Hypostases and the dogma of the Oneness of Essence~
32 I, 2,7    |         although it is a separate dogma — or else they are confusing~
33 I, 2,7    |          expressions refer to the~dogma of the Oneness of Essence,
34 I, 2,7    |     distinguish this from another~dogma, the dogma of the begetting
35 I, 2,7    |           from another~dogma, the dogma of the begetting and the
36 I, 2,7    |        expression, preserving the dogma of the procession from the
37 I, 2,7    |       noticed a distortion of the dogma of the Holy Spirit in~the
38 I, 2,7    |       special~treatise about this dogma.~The providential sending
39 I, 2,7    |        side, by introducing a new dogma the Roman Church violated
40 I, 2,7    |        does not at all comprise a dogma of the Orthodox Church;
41 II, 3,6   |         linked with this view the dogma of the Immaculate Conception
42 II, 6,3   |           the Church revealed the dogma of the one Hypostasis of
43 II, 6,4   |         closest fashion, with the dogma of~God the Word’s becoming
44 II, 6,4   |      proceed immediately from the dogma of the unity of the Hypostasis
45 II, 6,4   |            Matthew and Luke. This dogma was entered into the Symbol
46 II, 6,4   |       Mary is Theotokos.~With the dogma of the Son of God’s becoming
47 II, 6,4   |    Theotokos.”~The Roman-Catholic dogma of the immaculate conception.~
48 II, 6,4   |        immaculate conception.~The dogma of the Immaculate Conception
49 II, 6,4   |            The definition of this dogma says that the Most Holy
50 II, 6,4   |           acknowledgement of this dogma was preceded in the West
51 II, 6,4   |  triumphantly proclaimed a~second dogma, the dogma of the Assumption
52 II, 6,4   |    proclaimed a~second dogma, the dogma of the Assumption of the
53 II, 6,4   |           theology from the Roman dogma of the Immaculate~Conception
54 II, 6,4   |          the establishment of the dogma of the Immaculate~Conception
55 II, 6,5   |                               The dogma of redemption~The Lamb of
56 II, 6,5   |   redemption~The Lamb of God.~The dogma of salvation in Christ is
57 II, 6,5   |          in Christ is the central dogma of Christianity, the heart
58 II, 6,6   |     almost complete denial of the dogma of Redemption and to the
59 II, 6,7   |  broadening~of the meaning of the dogma of Chalcedon. The term ‘
60 II, 9,5   |     following words expressed the dogma of the veneration~of sacred
61 II, 9,7   |          her.~Thus is defined the dogma of the Cross. The Cross
62 Add, 0,3  |   Christian theology: it is not a dogma of~the Church in the precise
63 App, 1    |       sides rejecting the Vatican dogma of papal infallibility~—
64 App, 1    |      development in the~sphere of dogma. What, then, is subject
65 App, 1    |            but that the sphere of dogma~in the history of the Church