Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

 1 Intro, A,1|             under the influence of philosophy, and c) through the~weakness
 2 Intro, C,2|              Theology, Science and Philosophy.~The difference between
 3 Intro, C,2|          also between theology and philosophy. Philosophy is erected~upon
 4 Intro, C,2|           theology and philosophy. Philosophy is erected~upon purely rational
 5 Intro, C,2|          confused; theology is not philosophy even~when it plunges our
 6 Intro, C,2|           experimental sciences or philosophy. St. Gregory the~Theologian
 7 I, 1,9    |          pure Spirit. However, the~philosophy of Pantheism (“God is all”),
 8 I, 2,6    |      borrowed by Christianity from~philosophy, as certain western interpreters
 9 I, 2,6    |           was interpreted in Greek philosophy and in the~Jewish philosopher,
10 I, 2,8    |         influence of the so~called philosophy of idealism in the first
11 II, 3,6   |            been inherited from the philosophy of Plato, concerning the
12 App, 1    |           does not really touch on philosophy or theology,~remaining a
13 App, 1    |    resurrection of ancient Gnostic philosophy. Both of them, however,
14 App, 1    |        they were expressed~more as philosophy than as theology.~Soloviev
15 App, 2    |                                    Philosophy and Theology.~Into contemporary
16 App, 2    |              dogmatic learning and~philosophy. Such a mixture is liable
17 App, 2    |       which had~been worked out by philosophy. Why? By this they threw
18 App, 2    |            out a bridge from Greek philosophy to~Christian philosophy.
19 App, 2    |            philosophy to~Christian philosophy. Christianity stepped forth
20 App, 2    |         substitution (of Christian philosophy for pagan). Christian~apologetics
21 App, 2    |           Scripture as by~means of philosophy, since Arianism had taken
22 App, 2    |      Arianism had taken from Greek philosophy its fundamental error —~
23 App, 2    | conceptions, the interest~in Greek philosophy gradually died out in Patristic
24 App, 2    |          was natural. Theology and philosophy are distinguished first
25 App, 2    |            has followed this path.~Philosophy goes on a different path.
26 App, 2    |      manifestations, and so forth. Philosophy by its nature comes~from
27 App, 2    |        faith in~God (in idealistic philosophy), it reasons about God “
28 App, 2    |              dogmatic theology and philosophy —are likewise to be distinguished~
29 App, 2    |         experimental sciences use.~Philosophy is rational and abstract.
30 App, 2    |            can simply not say that philosophy is able to raise the religion
31 App, 2    |  cooperation~of these two spheres. Philosophy itself comes to the conclusion
32 App, 2    |           fact that the history of philosophy~for almost its whole duration
33 App, 2    |            knowledge, theology~and philosophy. Thus is religious philosophy
34 App, 2    |      philosophy. Thus is religious philosophy created; and in Christianity,
35 App, 2    | Christianity, this means Christian~philosophy.~But Christian religious
36 App, 2    |            But Christian religious philosophy has a difficult path: to
37 App, 2    |         thought,~as a principle of philosophy, with faithfulness to the
38 App, 2    |           the systems of Christian philosophy will be~forced to sacrifice,
39 App, 2    |    dogmatic~theology and Christian philosophy, and every attempt to turn
40 App, 2    |           dogmatics into Christian philosophy~must be decisively rejected. (
41 App, 2    |       creation of a true Christian philosophy in 19th-century Russia,
42 App, 2    |          to~this day. Kireyevsky's philosophy might well be considered
43 App, 3    |            of points in Soloviev's philosophy which are most evidently