Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

 1 Intro, C |       investigating the “gradual~development of Christian teaching”;
 2 Intro, C |          one may speak about the development of dogmatic theology as
 3 Intro, C |   grounds for speaking about the development of the~Christian teaching
 4 I, 2,7   |          is backward in dogmatic development, that one must be~condescending
 5 I, 2,7   |         the Roman theory of the “development of dogmas”) is concealed~
 6 II, 3,1  |     concerning the beginning and~development of the world order. It is
 7 II, 4,1  |          a freedom~of growth and development, the use of their own powers
 8 II, 4,2  |        must have facilitated the development both of their physical and
 9 II, 4,2  |       the other, facilitated the development~of his mental capabilities,
10 II, 4,2  |          a speedy and~harmonious development and growth of all man's
11 II, 5,1  |    becoming a source of constant development and renewal in the world.~
12 II, 5,3  |      evil.~It only restrains the development of evil. It was most necessary
13 II, 6,4  |         the Roman theory of the “development of~dogmas.” The Orthodox
14 II, 0,2  |        others.~The most detailed development of these ideas is made by
15 App, 1   |         The question of dogmatic development.~The question of dogmatic
16 App, 1   |         The question of dogmatic development has long been a subject
17 App, 1   |         of view, the idea of the development of dogmas?~In the majority
18 App, 1   |         occurs because~the word “development” is understood in different
19 App, 1   |       ways: Does one understand “development” as~the uncovering of something
20 App, 1   |         the question of dogmatic development was present, in particular,
21 App, 1   |         the~question of dogmatic development, the view which does not
22 App, 1   |          to justify the dogmatic development of the~Roman Church defended
23 App, 1   |         defended the idea of the development of the Church's dogmatic
24 App, 1   |     defend the point of view of “development” not only by his sympathies~
25 App, 1   |    disputes concerning “dogmatic development.”~In Russian religious and
26 App, 1   |        Soloviev received further development and~changes, and the first
27 App, 1   |     acknowledge the principle of development, remain a lifeless collection
28 App, 1   |        at all deny every kind of development in the~sphere of dogma.
29 App, 1   |        What, then, is subject to development in dogmatics?~The history
30 App, 1   |    learning itself is subject to development. Dogmatic theology can use~
31 App, 1   |   another historical period. The development~of theological learning
32 App, 3   |     highest stage in the gradual development of religions.~According
33 App, 3   |        we must~also speak of the development experimental or natural
34 App, 3   | religious thinking ... Religious development is a positive~and objective