Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

 1 Intro, A,9|            services were often great theologians in their own right. For
 2 Intro, B,2|        eighth century.~Among Russian theologians, the most complete works
 3 Intro, B,2|              among Orthodox academic~theologians in recent years, and some
 4 Intro, B,2|            trust in today's Orthodox theologians as being untainted by “Western
 5 I, 2,7    |              In their defense, Roman theologians cite a series of passages
 6 I, 2,7    |              passages cited by~Roman theologians are: the words of the Savior
 7 I, 2,7    |              like fashion, the Roman theologians find in the works of the
 8 I, 2,7    |         present case, Roman Catholic theologians are either confusing two
 9 I, 2,7    |              to reproach the Western theologians for their innovations, St.
10 I, 2,7    |            of the Holy~Spirit, Roman theologians transferred the concept
11 I, 2,7    |            violation.~But when Roman theologians try to say that the whole
12 II, 5,3   |        Protestantism. Roman Catholic~theologians consider that the consequence
13 II, 5,3   |          original sin,' though Greek theologians are careful when they use
14 II, 5,3   |        original sin. As recent Greek theologians have~pointed out, original
15 II, 6,4   |      deduction was made by the Latin~theologians. They called this removal
16 II, 6,4   |             in the view of the Roman theologians,~she accepted death voluntarily
17 II, 8,6   |              for sins,” as the Roman theologians teach. They are acts which
18 II, 8,6   | supererogatory works (Roman Catholic theologians divide~good works into two
19 Add, 0,7  |        attempts in certain modernist theologians of our~times to introduce
20 App, 1    |            are to be seen in certain~theologians who have entered the path