Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

 1 I, 1,5  | preservation, instruction, and true interpretation of which are the duty and
 2 I, 1,9  |          was quite “literal” in his interpretation. His point, and~Father Michael'
 3 I, 1,9  |      sometimes requires a~“literal” interpretation, and sometimes a metaphorical.
 4 I, 1,9  |         also forbade an allegorical interpretation of the “rivers” and “waters”
 5 I, 2,10 |            diverse tongues, and the interpretation of tongues — he concludes: “
 6 II, 5,3 |        about the devil confirm this interpretation: “He was a~murderer from
 7 II, 6,4 |         sense of the Roman Catholic interpretation, although it does venerate
 8 II, 6,6 |        Roman Catholic teaching.~The interpretation of the truth of the Redemption
 9 II, 6,6 |        satisfaction.~This one-sided interpretation of Redemption became the
10 II, 6,7 |            was given a more perfect interpretation; it was placed upon better
11 II, 8,3 |            10:48). According to the interpretation of the ancient Fathers,
12 II, 8,5 |          and do not allow any other interpretation apart from the most~direct
13 II, 8,5 |           to be~almost a symbolical interpretation (something which the Protestants
14 Add, 0,5|          According to the universal~interpretation of the Holy Fathers, these “
15 Add, 0,6|          according to the universal interpretation of the~Holy Fathers of the
16 Add, 0,7|             error of the chiliastic interpretation of the 20th chapter of the~
17 App, 1  |          the facts of exegesis (the interpretation of the text of Sacred Scripture),