Chapter, Paragraph

 1  2,5 |   culture, so that, according to Krumbacher, “Christian topics were
 2  2,5 |          provinces, according to Krumbacher, were “discovered” and colonized
 3  3,16|    Procopius and Agathias,” says Krumbacher, “he is the peak of a rapidly
 4  5,8 |        vivid style. According to Krumbacher, who made a special study
 5  6,8 |        the local peasantry.[171] Krumbacher was undoubtedly right when
 6  7,4 |     Hellenic tongue and used, as Krumbacher said, an artificial, “almost
 7  7,4 |        Tzetzes were described by Krumbacher as, “nothing but a huge
 8  8,16|      names were not mentioned in Krumbacher’s famous History of Byzantine
 9  8,16|         and cultural value.[175] Krumbacher’s opinion that this poem
10  8,16|         Hundred Years’ War.[186] Krumbacher, who was inclined to refer
11  8,16|    Despotat of Epirus).~ In 1897 Krumbacher could only mention John
12  8,16|          Byzantine Literature by Krumbacher, published in 1897.[198]
13  9,7 |      Hades, “undoubtedly,” as K. Krumbacher said, perhaps not without
14  9,17|    Emperors of the last dynasty. Krumbacher, also puzzled by the appearance
15  9,18|         of the time. “It seems,” Krumbacher wrote, “as if those men,
16  9,18|         of Gregoras’ importance. Krumbacher called him “the greatest
17  9,18|         Guilland, disagreed with Krumbacher. He wrote: “Is Gregoras
18  9,18|       time of the Palaeologi, as Krumbacher likes to call him? No. He
19  9,18|     intellectual era and are, as Krumbacher said, less closely connected
20  9,18|   excellent text critic, who, as Krumbacher said,[408] may be placed
21  9,18| indication as to the Greek poet. Krumbacher thought that the author