Chapter, Paragraph

 1  4,1 |         Bulgarians, and Arabs. L. Bréhier wrote that “this period
 2  4,4 |        new administrative regime. Bréhier supported Kulakovsky in
 3  5,4 |         French Byzantine scholar, Bréhier, called particular attention
 4  5,4 |           Christ. In other words, Bréhier brought to the fore the
 5  6,7 |     eastern Turkish menace arose. Bréhier’s appraisal of the consequences
 6  7,1 | reinforcements. Finally, in 1928, Bréhier wrote: “It is possible,
 7  7,1 |         that the French historian Bréhier judged it possible to speak
 8  7,1 |       Christian regions.~ When L. Bréhier wrote of the Byzantine protectorate
 9  7,1 |       will of the Greek Emperor.” Bréhier ascribed Rosen’s hypothesis
10  7,1 |         Yahya, one may not affirm Bréhier’s theory of the Byzantine
11  7,2 |        emphasized by Norden, whom Bréhier followed, is not authentic;
12  9,13|           moment, according to L. Bréhier, a dark future was beginning
13  9,18|           recent works of Millet, Bréhier, and Aïnalov, Diehl in the
14  9,18|          quoted.[434]~ In 1930 L. Bréhier wrote; “The Byzantine art