Chapter, Paragraph

  1  2,1 |      preconceived opinions. The French historian Boissier wrote in his Fall
  2  2,1 |               of the well-known German historian, Jacob Burckhardt, expressed
  3  2,1 |                Schoenebeck, the German historian, questioned Grégoire’s opinion;
  4  2,1 |             Nicomedia is great. As one historian has said, “In reality, without
  5  2,2 |                the ancients. The Greek historian of the fifth century, B.C.,
  6  2,2 |               6, c. 320) and the Roman historian, Tacitus (Ann. xii, 63),
  7  2,2 |           Philip of Macedon. The Greek historian of the second century B.C.,
  8  2,2 |                 According to the Roman historian, Suetonius (I, 79), Julius
  9  2,2 |               senate, according to the historian of the fourth century, Eutropius,
 10  2,2 |           precisely in this light. The historian of the fifth century, Orosius,
 11  2,2 |                 Thus, according to one historian,[68] Julian received two
 12  2,2 |                his cherished plan. The historian Ammianus Marcellinus described
 13  2,2 |                According to the church historian Sozomen, the following incident
 14  2,3 |          contemporaries. The Christian historian of the fifth century, Philostorgius,
 15  2,3 |      punishment.”[99] According to one historian, this decree shows clearly
 16  2,3 |                superstitio).[103]~ One historian called this edict of 392 “
 17  2,3 |             the army. According to the historian Jordanes, a division of
 18  2,3 |             their own tribe. The pagan historian of the fifth century, Zosimus,
 19  2,3 |               spared Athens. The pagan historian of the fifth century, Zosimus,
 20  2,3 |                which, according to one historian, may be called the anti-German
 21  2,4 |              even such a distinguished historian as Fustel de Coulanges stated
 22  2,4 |            that is, “Butcher,” but the historian Th. I. Uspensky affirmed
 23  2,5 |                favor, according to one historian of the sixth century, one “
 24  2,5 |                large reserve which the historian Procopius estimated, perhaps
 25  2,5 |               He was not essentially a historian, yet he left extremely important
 26  2,5 |              belongs also the greatest historian of Egyptian monasticism,
 27  2,5 |             Julian as a gifted writer, historian, thinker, satirist, and
 28  2,5 |                 But in 1923 an English historian wrote: “The time and labour
 29  2,5 |             181]~ Priscus of Thrace, a historian of the fifth century and
 30  2,5 |          writer, Zosimus is not only a historian of the “decline of Rome”
 31  2,5 |              called him the last great historian of Rome.[184]~ Athens, the
 32  3,2 |              the pen of Procopius, the historian of Justinian’s epoch, paints
 33  3,2 |              and wit. According to one historian (Diehl), “she amused, charmed,
 34  3,4 |             peace for fifty years. The historian Menander[32] contributed
 35  3,6 |                s government,” said one historian, “was in its church policy
 36  3,6 |            school was confiscated. One historian writes, “The same year when
 37  3,8 |              Peloponnesian war, so the historian Procopius, who witnessed
 38  3,10|            caused John of Ephesus, the historian of the time of Justin II,
 39  3,15|             the writings of the church historian of the late sixth century,
 40  3,15|             Fallmerayer was the German historian, Carl Hopf, who had studied
 41  3,16|              of material.~ The special historian of Justinian’s period was
 42  3,16|        Persians. He stands out both as historian and as writer. As a historian
 43  3,16|          historian and as writer. As a historian he was in a most advantageous
 44  3,16|           Justinian and Procopius, the historian Peter the Patrician, a brilliant
 45  3,16|          historical writings, and each historian carried on the work of those
 46  3,16|        indication that he was a better historian than Agathias. The work
 47  3,16|              rapidly rising curve. The historian of Belisarius, in spite
 48  3,16|               by his contemporary, the historian Agathias,[156] mentioned
 49  4   |             inferred from the Armenian historian of the seventh century,
 50  4,1 |          Persians. A twentieth-century historian, Th. I. Uspensky, compared
 51  4,1 |              The contemporary Armenian historian Sebeos gave an account of
 52  4,1 |       Eutychius, the Christian Arabian historian of the tenth century, said
 53  4,1 |             Beladsori, another Arabian historian of the ninth century, said
 54  4,1 |               still exist. The Arabian historian and geographer of the tenth
 55  4,3 |      Constantine, as the German church historian, Hefele, pointed out, had
 56  4,4 |                Empire had not a single historian. Only the deacon of St.
 57  5,2 |            ecumenical date.” The Greek historian Lampros compares these events
 58  5,3 |                was said by the Russian historian E. Lipshitz in 1945. After
 59  5,4 |                by the well-known Greek historian, Paparrigopoulo, whose biased
 60  5,4 |         practice persisted. The church historian of the fourth century, Eusebius
 61  5,6 |             the Empire.[107] A western historian of the period, Paul the
 62  5,6 |              of the empire. The German historian P. Schramm, who called Charles’
 63  5,7 |           Empire,”[117] while a French historian characterized the deeds
 64  5,8 |                for Theophilus. An Arab historian even says that Mamun looked
 65  5,8 |           Assemani, the Russian church historian, Golubinsky, also arrived
 66  5,8 |              the opinion of an Italian historian, Gabotto, Euphemius was
 67  5,8 |             measures. According to one historian, Patriarch Nicephorus, deposed
 68  6,1 |            origin.[1] According to one historian who has made a special study
 69  6,2 |                the words of the French historian, Rambaud, “All the failures
 70  6,2 |               the Empire.~ The Arabian historian of the eleventh century,
 71  6,2 |             resist him.”[23] The Greek historian, of the time, Leo the Deacon,
 72  6,2 |              the works of the Armenian historian, Matthew of Edessa.[25]
 73  6,2 |               by the Christian Arabian historian, Yahya of Antioch, it is
 74  6,2 |               The contemporary Arabian historian, Yahya of Antioch, said
 75  6,2 |          Persarmenia. According to one historian, the political division
 76  6,3 |              about which the Bulgarian historian Zlatarsky commented: “According
 77  6,3 |             Anchialus (in Thrace). The historian Leo the Deacon visited the
 78  6,3 |               According to an Austrian historian, “the downfall of the Bulgarian
 79  6,7 |             councils. According to one historian, this council “was, on the
 80  6,7 |              Christians!” The Catholic historian of Photius wrote that “praises
 81  6,7 |           successors. According to one historian, “the most noble traits
 82  6,7 |     Constantinople. The Russian church historian, A. P. Lebedev, summed up
 83  6,7 |              of God.[92] The Byzantine historian, Leo the Deacon, wrote that
 84  6,8 |             unlikely, according to one historian, that the government viewed “
 85  6,8 |                the Turks.[149] Another historian calls the battle “the death
 86  6,8 |             One contemporary Byzantine historian remarks even that “the entire
 87  6,8 |              that, in the words of one historian, he “made for himself a
 88  6,8 |             about Constantine came the historian Joseph Genesius, the author
 89  6,8 |              known even to the Russian historian, Karamzin (early nineteenth
 90  6,8 |                The famous Austrian art historian, J. Strzygowski, attempted
 91  7,1 |             Bryennius, who was also an historian. The aged Alexius remained,
 92  7,1 |                 foreigner.” The French historian Diehl compared the condition
 93  7,1 |              interesting type for both historian and novelist. Andronicus,
 94  7,1 |               little moral sense.”~ An historian contemporary with Andronicus,
 95  7,1 |               a dark spring.” The same historian compared Andronicus to the “
 96  7,1 |            Robert Guiscard, the French historian Chalandon declared, “opened
 97  7,1 |             invasion.” Another Russian historian, Th. Uspensky, wrote: “In
 98  7,1 |                of Flanders. The French historian Chalandon admitted that
 99  7,1 |             scholar Kugler, the French historian, Chalandon, added: “This
100  7,1 |               statement of the Belgian historian must be accepted with some
101  7,1 |          Jerusalem, so that the French historian Bréhier judged it possible
102  7,1 |                statement of an Arabian historian of the eleventh century,
103  7,1 |           devastations,” said a French historian, “will the Mediterranean
104  7,1 |              investigation of a German historian, H. Sybel, published for
105  7,1 |              to recall that an Italian historian names the first crusades “
106  7,1 |               from Russia. The Russian historian, Kluchevsky, wrote: “This
107  7,1 |           about this episode. A recent historian remarked, “From the council
108  7,1 |              the Empire.~ ~The special historian of Alexius Comnenus, Chalandon,
109  7,1 |          movement came from an Arabian historian of the twelfth century,
110  7,1 |         comparison, as says the French historian Chalandon, may be applied
111  7,1 |                which, as the Byzantine historian Nicetas Choniates said, “
112  7,1 |         intercourse,” said the Russian historian C. Grot, “could not destroy
113  7,1 |             the Byzantine alliance. An historian contemporary with Frederick,
114  7,1 |         escaped capture. The Byzantine historian, Nicetas Choniates, wrote: “
115  7,1 |                names.”~ A contemporary historian who spent some time in Constantinople
116  7,1 |              that city. A contemporary historian, addressing the Venetian
117  7,1 |           first occasion.~ The special historian of Manuel’s epoch estimated
118  7,1 |          forever.” This opinion of the historian of the nineteenth century
119  7,1 |         Andronicus,” wrote the Russian historian, Th. Uspensky, “is interesting
120  7,1 |           wealth, reminded the Italian historian, Cognasso, of the struggle
121  7,1 |              least, a western medieval historian remarked: “The Emperor hostile
122  7,1 |              of 1182. Said a Byzantine historian of that time, Nicetas Choniates: “
123  7,2 |              that, as a recent Italian historian of the rule of Isaac II
124  7,2 |            march. In this connection a historian of the nineteenth century,
125  7,2 |          Christian countries. A modern historian stated, “No crusade had
126  7,2 |               authority of a Byzantine historian of that epoch, Nicetas Choniates,
127  7,3 |                deter the assailants. A historian exclaimed, “A beautiful
128  7,3 |          participant in it, the French historian Geoffrey de Villehardouin.
129  7,3 |             Byzantium. Then the German historian, Karl Hopf, seemed definitely
130  7,3 |            nineteenth century a German historian, W. Norden, definitely refuting “
131  7,3 |                 This,” said the French historian Luchaire, “will never be
132  7,3 |                new Empire. A Byzantine historian, Nicetas Choniates, a strong
133  7,3 |    Villehardouin, nephew of the famous historian, was off the shore of Syria
134  7,4 |           purely political. The German historian Norden rightly remarked, “
135  7,4 |             himself took part in it. A historian of that epoch, Nicetas Choniates,
136  7,4 |               both men and women.~ The historian Nicetas Choniates drew a
137  7,4 |               public offices ceased. A historian contemporary with Andronicus,
138  7,4 |               Comnenus, as the English historian Freeman emphasized in his
139  7,4 |          monarchy lost, as the Italian historian, Cognasso, said, “its power
140  7,4 |       nineteenth century a woman as an historian was indeed a rara avis.
141  7,4 |             interests of the epoch.~ A historian, John Cinnamus, a contemporary
142  7,4 |              barbarian,” deserves as a historian great trust and deep attention.
143  7,4 |            philosopher, theologian and historian. Although the published
144  8,1 |               destructively,” said one historian, “and therefore they were
145  8,2 |            itself,” stated a Bulgarian historian, “the purely Bulgarian national
146  8,2 |      contemporary, the very well-known historian Nicetas Choniates, who,
147  8,5 |               the Emperor of Nicaea. A historian of that time said that Henry
148  8,9 |                to quote the well-known historian Jireček, “he expanded the
149  8,9 |              among the Greeks, A Greek historian of the thirteenth century,
150  8,10|           nineteenth century, a French historian wrote that Frederick II “
151  8,10|               A few years ago a German historian said; “In his universality,
152  8,10|              perennial interest to the historian, Emperor Frederick II represents
153  8,11|             stories given by a western historian of the thirteenth century,
154  8,13|              to come.”[97] The special historian of the time of Theodore
155  8,13|              reception.[103]~ A recent historian remarked that Theodore “
156  8,13|            severe judgment of a German historian, Gregorovius, “a creation
157  8,13|        absurdity.”[113] Another German historian remarked: “The Latin ignominy
158  8,15|               no information. A recent historian even judged it possible
159  8,16|                 Nicetas Acominatus, an historian, retired to Nicaea after
160  8,16|        Lascaris, and a very well known historian and statesman, George Acropolita.
161  8,16|             the Emperor was the future historian and statesman George Acropolita.
162  8,17|        hypothesis of the noted Russian historian cannot be proved. The system
163  8,17| monastery-fiefs, which according to an historian, took in Byzantium the place
164  8,17|                  according to a French historian, A. Rambaud, “far removed
165  8,17|             the West.”[236] An English historian, J. B. Bury, says that the
166  8,17|         feudalism in general. A French historian who made a special study
167  8,17|              Very recently an American historian who wrote a very important
168  8,17|               begun. In 1879 a Russian historian, V. Vasilievsky, in connection
169  9,2 |             reasonable sultan,” said a historian of the fifteenth century, “
170  9,2 |       repulsion for her; the Byzantine historian Ducas, who describes her
171  9,2 |           remarked both by a Byzantine historian, and by a French pilgrim
172  9,2 |        intimate friend, a diplomat and historian of the epoch of the Palaeologi,
173  9,2 |             and Iberia.[28] The French historian Diehl remarked that, despite
174  9,2 |                Palaeologina. A Russian historian, Kluchevsky, said: “As heiress
175  9,3 |           dicti Regni).[44] An Italian historian of the twentieth century
176  9,3 |             work of the famous Italian historian and patriot, Michele Amari,
177  9,3 |                innovation that, as the historian Ranke wrote, “the people,
178  9,3 |              danger there. A Byzantine historian of the fifteenth century,
179  9,3 |                this observation of the historian well emphasizes a distinct
180  9,3 |               Muhammedans. As a recent historian said, “Hulagu led the Nestorian [
181  9,3 |               slavery.[65] A Byzantine historian says that the Mamluks were
182  9,4 |           Spanish race.[81] The German historian Hopf declared that “the
183  9,4 |                 83] Elsewhere the same historian remarked: “The expedition
184  9,4 |           Greece.[91] A modern Catalan historian, the best recent authority
185  9,5 |     Constantinople itself. A Byzantine historian of the fourteenth century,
186  9,6 |        Cantacuzene. The same Byzantine historian wrote that while a Christian
187  9,7 |            Turkish troops. As a recent historian said, the Oriental problem
188  9,7 |          returned to Paris. An English historian of the fifteenth century,
189  9,7 |                 reported the Byzantine historian Phrantzes, said of Manuel: “
190  9,7 |          fields destroyed, A Byzantine historian wrote: “When Timur’s Mongols
191  9,7 |            Morea, Theodore. The German historian, Pallmerayer, was the first,
192  9,8 |             none other than the future historian Laonikos Chalcocondyles,
193  9,9 |             and organizer. A Byzantine historian relates that he occupied
194  9,9 |              young sultan, who, as the historian Ducas said, “by night and
195  9,9 |              Finally, the fourth Greek historian of the last period of Byzantium,
196  9,9 |                 The contemporary Greek historian, Critobulus, had a good
197  9,9 |               imagine,” wrote a recent historian of the siege and capture
198  9,9 |             speech quoted by the Greek historian, Phrantzes,[219] Constantine
199  9,9 |           Byzantine sources an English historian, E. Pears, gave a striking
200  9,9 |               contemporary, the Polish historian Jan Diugosz, wrote in his
201  9,11|                to Greek Orthodoxy. The historian Norden said that Pope Gregory
202  9,11|             patriarch Germanus and the historian George Acropolitas, the
203  9,12|              or moderates;[249] church historian A. Lebedev styled this party “
204  9,12|               to power and activity. A historian of that time, Gregoras,
205  9,12|              became patriarch the same historian wrote: “It seemed to these
206  9,12|           differed. The Russian church historian A. Lebedev, said: “When
207  9,12|     representatives of both parties; a historian of that time said; “The
208  9,12|          populace “godly men” and by a historian, Pachymeres, “wearers of
209  9,12|               schism. A Russian church historian, J. E. Troizky, described
210  9,12|              and restored Orthodoxy. A historian of that time wrote: “Envoys
211  9,17|             reigned everywhere.[304] A historian of the fourteenth century,
212  9,17|             quite clear. The Roumanian historian, Tafrali, considered the
213  9,17|                the other hand, another historian maintained that in the revolt
214  9,17|       administration.[330] A Byzantine historian, Pachymeres, admired the
215  9,18|                nineteenth century. One historian said, “on the eve of her
216  9,18|                events of the time. The historian Pachymeres (1242-1310),
217  9,18|                was the first Byzantine historian whose main interest lay
218  9,18|            Phrantzes was their special historian and he often exaggerated
219  9,18|        education. According to a Greek historian, he was distinguished “by
220  9,18|               to schism.”[362] Another historian of the fourteenth century
221  9,18|             been used by the Roumanian historian Tafrali in his monograph
222  9,18|             fascinating themes for the historian interested in the cultural
223  9,19|             among his pupils. A French historian of the Renaissance, Monnier,