Chapter, Paragraph

  1  2,1 |              conversion of Constantine~Historians and theologians have been
  2  2,1 |              the pagan writer Zosimus. Historians have found ample opportunity
  3  2,1 |             Empire.[19]~ Recently some historians made an interesting attempt
  4  2,1 |                much disagreement among historians. The earliest account of
  5  2,1 |               29] For a long time most historians failed to accept this view.
  6  2,1 |             for the claim made by some historians that during the reign of
  7  2,2 |                as from the accounts of historians.[40] The most enthusiastic
  8  2,2 |        Apostles (Isoapostolic). Modern historians have likened him to Peter
  9  2,2 |            home of Socrates.”[69] Many historians claim that it was during
 10  2,2 |              the Christians. Christian historians, however, relate the well-known
 11  2,3 |          especially the Russian church historians, agree that the creed of
 12  2,3 |           these two political parties, historians speak of a third party,
 13  2,3 |           restore their churches. Some historians call this decree the Edict
 14  2,3 |                life of the Empire that historians no longer look upon Theodosius
 15  2,5 |             were collective names, and historians consider it probable that
 16  2,5 |          Constantinople almost all the historians were Greeks. Patristic literature
 17  2,5 |              work of many later church historians and was often imitated.
 18  2,5 |          literature.~ A whole group of historians continued what Eusebius
 19  2,5 |             and the Huns for the Latin historians of the sixth century, Cassiodorus
 20  3,2 |        surrounded by her court. Church historians contemporary with Theodora,
 21  3,6 |              bring it into subjection. Historians have tried to analyze the
 22  3,6 |               and spiritual power. The historians who emphasize the political
 23  3,15|                attention even of those historians who disagree with it either
 24  3,15|              very popular with Russian historians, who proclaim that his work
 25  3,16|                period produced several historians, whom Justinian’s enterprises
 26  3,16|      frequently followed the classical historians, especially Herodotus and
 27  3,16|                language of the ancient historians, and in spite of some artificiality
 28  3,16| Porphyrogenitus.~ In addition to these historians and geographers, the sixth
 29  3,16|            middle position between the historians and chroniclers was occupied
 30  4,1 |             form of a crusade.~ Modern historians think it probable that Heraclius
 31  4,1 |               attract the attention of historians and archeologists even today.~
 32  4,1 |         Sassanids of that time. Modern historians have reached the conclusion
 33  4,1 |                heresies. The Byzantine historians also showed very little
 34  4,1 |           former sweeping nature. Some historians, for instance, Gelzer, think
 35  4,1 |                brief indications which historians and chroniclers supply.
 36  4,4 |            period of the theme system, historians have made use of occasional
 37  5,2 |           connection with this siege.~ Historians attach very great significance
 38  5,2 |              attain his goal, but some historians call him “the first Bulgar-slayer” (
 39  5,4 |                is frequently stated by historians that the Arabian caliph
 40  5,4 |              One of the Russian church historians, A. P. Lebedev, wrote: “
 41  5,5 |                stated definitely that “historians and theologians have purposely
 42  5,7 |              of the Isaurian dynasty.~ Historians place much value upon the
 43  5,7 |                exception of the church historians, have not yet made any attempts
 44  5,8 |            year 867 has been viewed by historians as a transitional period
 45  5,8 |               by the great majority of historians to the year 865 or 866,
 46  5,8 |                 Michael II. While some historians consider him neutral and
 47  5,8 |              on Theophilus might force historians to forsake the claim that
 48  5,8 |              been fully appreciated by historians. The English scholar believed
 49  5,8 |          iconoclasts are viewed by art historians as a return to the classical
 50  5,8 |                 This is viewed by some historians as a partial victory for
 51  5,8 |              iconoclastic epoch had no historians, though the chroniclers
 52  5,8 |            about grammarians, orators, historians, natural scientists, doctors,
 53  6,1 |             others, especially Russian historians prior to the seventies of
 54  6,5 |                who was the first among historians to make clear the historical
 55  6,6 |                evidence. Although some historians have asserted that the letter
 56  6,6 |                is spurious,[71] recent historians do not support this opinion.[
 57  6,7 |                which are considered by historians as the true precursors of
 58  6,7 | Ibn-Khurdadhbah, and in other sources, historians claim that there were twenty-five
 59  6,8 |           regarded him as a God.”[181] Historians still disagree in their
 60  7,1 |          connection with these events, historians usually discuss the problem
 61  7,1 |              spurious. The more recent historians who have been interested
 62  7,1 |           other hand, another group of historians, denying the importance
 63  7,1 |               the prejudiced Byzantine historians drop a few hints at the
 64  7,1 |             appealed to the West. Some historians have accused Alexius and
 65  7,1 |                the Elbe (Laba) river.~ Historians strongly disapprove of Bernard’
 66  7,1 |               returned to Nicaea. Some historians ascribe the failure of the
 67  7,1 |             attack the crusaders. Some historians, for example Sybel and following
 68  7,2 |                discussed, and formerly historians believed that the brothers
 69  7,2 |              been emphasized by modern historians.” More recently, Bulgarian
 70  7,2 |               More recently, Bulgarian historians have traced the origin of
 71  7,2 |          achievement. Modern Roumanian historians, however, vigorously emphasize
 72  7,2 |              absolutely denied by some historians, who point out that such
 73  7,3 |                had existed because all historians had depended mainly on the
 74  7,3 |              the year 1201, as all the historians believed, but in 1202, so
 75  7,4 |              Hesiod, Homer, Plato, the historians Thucydides and Polybius,
 76  7,4 |          tragedians, Aristophanes, the historians Thucydides and Polybius,
 77  7,4 |                the Comneni and Angeli, historians and poets, theological writers
 78  7,4 |              important place among the historians of the twelfth and the beginning
 79  7,4 |                many poets, dramatists, historians, orators, philosophers,
 80  8,2 |              The Byzantine and western historians of the thirteenth century
 81  8,5 |             was “a real Ares.”[43] The historians of the twentieth century
 82  8,9 |          Thessalonica thereafter, some historians think, not with the title
 83  8,12|                enemies.”[89] Byzantine historians unanimously glorify John
 84  8,13|               sword in hand. Byzantine historians gave a detailed account
 85  8,17|               which, according to many historians and sociologists, all peoples
 86  8,17|             none the less many eminent historians, not without reason, discover
 87  9,3 |         history have been portrayed by historians so darkly as Charles of
 88  9,4 |                to their country, Greek historians consider the Catalans pillagers
 89  9,4 |             seen the Latin Roger!”[80] Historians of the nineteenth century
 90  9,4 |               the conception of former historians on this subject was biased.
 91  9,6 |   Constantinople is difficult to say.~ Historians usually call John Cantacuzene
 92  9,6 |               Mediterranean. Byzantine historians have left a detailed description
 93  9,7 |            concerned, is evident; both historians and chroniclers of the time
 94  9,9 |      protection of scholars and poets. Historians of the nineteenth and twentieth
 95  9,18|           humanists. A great number of historians described the last days
 96  9,18|                of important and gifted historians who endeavored to describe
 97  9,18|               his Greek.~ Finally, the historians of the fatal event of 1453,
 98  9,18|               yet, like most Byzantine historians, had a good knowledge of
 99  9,18|               which, in the opinion of historians, far outweigh the barbarism
100  9,18|             represented by a number of historians, produced almost no chroniclers.
101  9,19|                nineteenth century some historians thought that the Italian