Chapter, Paragraph

 1  2,3 |        upon the whole Empire, his code proved to be too bulky and
 2  2,4 |     publication of the Theodosian Code, which took place during
 3  2,4 |           part of the Empire. The code of Theodosius is divided
 4  2,4 |      after the publication of the code were called novels (leges
 5  2,4 |        leges novellae).[131]~ The code of Theodosius is of very
 6  2,4 |      practices. Furthermore, this code, together with the earlier
 7  2,4 |           Justinian. Finally, the code of Theodosius, introduced
 8  2,4 |      abridgment of the Theodosian code and the other sources mentioned.
 9  2,4 |          influence exerted by the code of Theodosius upon barbarian
10  2,4 |    influence through the Visigoth code. During the early Middle
11  2,4 |        Europe but not through the code of Justinian, which spread
12  2,4 |         132] The influence of the code went still further, for
13  2,4 |          be so, the value of this code in the life of the ancient
14  2,4 |         of Constantinople and the code of Theodosius still remain
15  2,5 |       collected in the Theodosian code as well as for the later
16  3,5 |      enormous task of compiling a code of imperial constitutions
17  3,5 |     publication of the Theodosian code. The results of all these
18  3,5 |         April, 529, the Justinian code (Codex Justinianus) was
19  3,5 |     became the sole authoritative code of laws in the Empire, thus
20  3,5 |        compilation of Justinian’s code was greatly aided by the
21  3,5 |           in three years. The new code, published in the year 533,
22  3,5 |          of knowledge,” i.e., the Code and the Digest. The young
23  3,5 |           revision. In short, the Code, in its edition of the year
24  3,5 |          the revised and enlarged Code, arranged in twelve books,
25  3,5 |          The first edition of the Code has not been preserved.~
26  3,5 |        Novellas leges). While the Code, the Digest, and the Institutions
27  3,5 |      indicated parts, namely, the Code, the Digest, the Institutions,
28  3,5 |           of certain parts of the Code as well as some more or
29  3,5 |            in the fifth year, the Code. In connection with the
30  3,5 |           importance. Justinian’s code preserved the Roman law,
31  3,5 |       western Europe, Justinian’s code of civil law became the
32  3,5 |        primary, significance. The Code was not studied for itself
33  3,5 |       century. The success of the Code in accomplishing this purpose
34  3,5 |         influences in Justinian’s Code, Digest, and Institutions.[
35  3,16|          two achievements are his code of civil law and the cathedral
36  5,3 |    century, the Latin text of his Code, Digest, and Institutes
37  5,3 |     realizing the need for such a code, Leo III entrusted the task
38  5,3 |           in the publication of a code entitled the Ecloga, issued
39  5,3 |           the Institutes, Digest, Code, Novels of the Great Justinian,
40  5,3 |       respects from the Justinian Code, and even contradicted it
41  5,3 |           Rules or Administrative Code, under the title, “The chapters
42  5,3 |  legislative documents: the Rural Code or Farmer’s Law (νομος γεωργικος),
43  5,3 |          γεωργικος), the Military Code (νομος στρατιωτικος), and
44  5,3 |     similar documents.~ The Rural Code (νομος γεωργικος) has attracted
45  5,3 |         to believe that the Rural Code was a product of the legislative
46  5,3 |        document, called the Rural Code “a supplementary record
47  5,3 |        been proved that the Rural Code was issued in the eighth
48  5,3 | Ostrogorsky stated that the Rural Code was “elaborated” under Justinian
49  5,3 |        probable date of the Rural Code; in other words she confirmed
50  5,3 |       Vasilievsky.[38]~ The Rural Code has also attracted the attention
51  5,3 |    Pančenko’s book that the Rural Code does not refer to the commune
52  5,3 |       Empire considered the Rural Code the achievement of Leo III
53  5,3 | thoroughly investigated the Rural Code, although he knew no Russian
54  5,3 |         relationship of the Rural Code to the Ecloga, he maintained,
55  5,3 |    society described by the Rural Code the farmer could migrate
56  5,3 |   Slavonic influence on the Rural Code, which he referred to Leo
57  5,3 |         on the basis of the Rural Code; it may serve only as another
58  5,3 |     attempts to compare the Rural Code with the texts of the Byzantine
59  5,3 |           phrases.[46]~ The Rural Code is of great interest from
60  5,3 |       Russian translation of this code forms part of a compilation
61  5,3 |      Russian version of the Rural Code. The latter is found also
62  5,3 |            the Sea Law, the Rural Code, and the Soldier’s Law.[
63  5,3 |         of Justinian’s Digest and Code, the Ecloga, and several
64  5,3 |        has been said on the Rural Code, the Sea Law, and the Military
65  6   |         publication of a gigantic code, the Basilics, and a number
66  6,7 |       desired to create a general code of Graeco-Roman or Byzantine
67  6,7 |       four parts of the Justinian code, written mostly in Latin
68  6,7 |   expressions retained in the new code were to be explained in
69  6,7 |       completion of the projected code would take much time, Basil
70  6,7 |      Other parts of the Justinian code were used to a much lesser
71  6,7 |   abridged versions of this older code that even the compilers
72  6,7 |        supposed to use the larger code of sixty books, also compiled
73  6,7 |             or the Administrative Code, mentioned as early as the
74  6,7 |          all parts of Justinian’s code are reshaped and combined
75  6,7 |    reshaped and combined into one code written in Greek. For this
76  6,7 |      translation of the Justinian code, but an adaptation of it
77  6,7 |             The revived classical code of the Basilics, however,
78  6,8 |    description of the complicated code of life at the imperial
79  7,4 |      so-called Constantinopolitan Code of the Octateuch in the
80  8,17|       century and included in the Code of Justinian in the sixth
81  8,17|         passed into the Justinian Code. Th. Uspensky, who regarded
82  8,17|          relation of the original code to the later Assises of
83  8,17|           the hands of scholars a code of feudal law brought into
84  9,18|         the very well-known Rural Code. The author used the earlier
85  9,18|          sources of the Justinian Code, the original form of altered