Chapter, Paragraph

 1  2,1 |         then the purely political theory in regard to Constantine’
 2  2,1 |     scholar O. Seeck advanced the theory that no Edict of Milan was
 3  2,5 |   scholars have even advanced the theory that the Slavs entered the
 4  2,5 |      German scholars advanced the theory that the “art of the Roman
 5  2,5 |        centuries. At present this theory is repudiated. Since the
 6  3   |           a historical fact. This theory was based upon a Life of
 7  3   |     without historical value. The theory of Justinian’s Slavonic
 8  3,3 |          heretics or pagans. This theory, expressed by Eusebius in
 9  3,3 |       carelessness. From this old theory arose also Justinian’s belief
10  3,12|       nineteenth century held the theory, discussed at length later,
11  3,15|           of the sixth century, a theory of the complete Slavonization
12  3,15|        openly and boldly this new theory, which shocked to the utmost
13  3,15|             Fallmerayer based his theory primarily on the data found
14  3,15|           advanced a new Albanian theory, according to which the
15  3,15|      originality of Fallmerayer’s theory. His opinion was nothing
16  3,15|       originator of Fallmerayer’s theory was Kopitar, a scholar of
17  3,15|          it is true, develop this theory in detail; but neither did
18  3,15|         extremes of Fallmerayer’s theory,” Petrovsky said, “cannot
19  3,15|         pertaining to it; but the theory itself, harmoniously and
20  3,15|            Without question, this theory, in spite of some very obvious
21  5,3 |   legislative authority.[42]~ The theory of the exceptional influence
22  5,3 |          the main basis for their theory the fact that the conception
23  5,3 |  Zlatarsky recently supported the theory of Slavonic influence on
24  5,3 |        parallel with serfdom. The theory of Slavonic influence must
25  5,6 |         spite of the fact that in theory there was still only one
26  5,6 |           of 812 A.D. revived, in theory, the position of the fifth
27  6,8 |          bases on which rests the theory of the Scandinavian origin
28  6,8 | Strzygowski, attempted to prove a theory which is closely connected
29  7,1 |          may not affirm Bréhier’s theory of the Byzantine protectorate
30  7,3 |           that it gives a special theory explaining the crusade upon
31  7,3 |       followers of the so-called “theory of accidents.” An opposing
32  7,3 |       partisans of the so-called “theory of premeditation.”~ Until
33  7,3 |         this problem, refuted the theory of Venetian treason and,
34  7,3 |           and, consequently, “the theory of premeditation.” But he
35  7,3 |        Empire fell to pieces. The theory of Hopf at the present time
36  7,3 |         But the followers of “the theory of premeditation” did not
37  7,3 |        blow was struck to Riant’s theory by an investigation of Vasilievsky,
38  7,3 | contemporary sources, refuted the theory of the German sovereign’
39  7,3 |      standpoint before 1860, “the theory of accidents.” Tessier said
40  7,3 |          Of Riant’s premeditation theory there remains only the fact
41  7,3 |          definitely refuting “the theory of premeditation” and agreeing
42  7,3 |    agreeing essentially with “the theory of accidents,” endeavored
43  8,13|   ambition of Theodore remained a theory. In reality the mercenary
44  9,4 |           out with the astounding theory that the Greeks had been
45  9,4 |            Although Fallmerayer’s theory as a whole is rejected,
46  9,12|       They followed the so-called theory of “economy,” which stated
47  9,12|     circumstances; to justify the theory of economy the politicians
48  9,17|           XI, are known.[333] The theory exists that under Manuel
49  9,17|      monometallism.[334] But this theory is not proved.~ The economic
50  9,18|           basileus pledged to the theory of divine right.”[394] Of
51  9,18|    history of Byzantine political theory has not yet been told. But
52  9,18|         not a practical political theory but an interpretation of
53  9,18|          art. If one accepts this theory, there is no renaissance
54  9,18|      unsatisfactorily known. This theory, which N. Kondakov called “