Chapter, Paragraph

 1  6,6|    capable and energetic leader, Robert Guiscard, whose major activities
 2  6,8|          leader in the person of Robert Guiscard, “who, from a chief
 3  6,8|         160]~ The main object of Robert Guiscard was the conquest
 4  6,8|        with alternating success. Robert conquered Brindisi, Tarentum,
 5  6,8|        the side of the Normans.~ Robert Guiscard besieged Bari,
 6  6,8|        western Emperor Lewis II. Robert’s siege of Bari was a difficult
 7  6,8|        was compelled to yield to Robert.[161]~ The fall of Bari
 8  6,8|        important point in Apulia Robert could quickly achieve the
 9  6,8|          southern Italy also set Robert’s forces free for the reconquest
10  6,8|         Italy, as represented by Robert Guiscard, must have felt
11  6,8|        in the Byzantine Empire.~ Robert, the duke of Apulia, who
12  6,8|           The ambitious plans of Robert Guiscard went beyond the
13  6,8|         understood the extent of Robert’s menace to the Empire and
14  6,8|          s son became engaged to Robert’s daughter. But this did
15  7,1|              The Duke of Apulia, Robert Guiscard, after conquering
16  7,1|       was perfectly natural that Robert’s chief attention should
17  7,1|     Greece,” “the pre‑crusade of Robert Guiscard, his great war
18  7,1|   Dyrrachium opened its gates to Robert. But a revolt which had
19  7,1|        out in south Italy called Robert away. Bohemond, to whom
20  7,1|         expedition undertaken by Robert against Byzantium was successful,
21  7,1|         out among his troops and Robert himself fell a victim to
22  7,1|    Middle Ages, from the name of Robert Guiscard), recalls the name
23  7,1|    powerful Duke of Apulia. With Robert’s death the Norman invasion
24  7,1|         the aggressive policy of Robert Guiscard in the Balkan peninsula
25  7,1|          was definitely decided. Robert had founded the Italian
26  7,1|        Duchy which came on after Robert’s death, lasted for about
27  7,1|          of the Italian Normans. Robert Guiscard, the French historian
28  7,1|         to his old friend, Count Robert of Flanders, who some years
29  7,1| addressed by Alexius Comnenus to Robert of Flanders. The French
30  7,1|        that the Emperor had sent Robert to remind him of the promised
31  7,1|     Chalandon’s hypothesis, that Robert, after his return to Flanders,
32  7,1|         the letter of Alexius to Robert of Flanders an official
33  7,1|   message of Alexius Comnenus to Robert of Flanders, because with
34  7,1|      must have sent a message to Robert of Flanders, and the probability
35  7,1|        is a most celebrated man, Robert the Devil, Duke of Normandy,
36  7,1|   message of Alexius Comnenus to Robert of Flanders shows, the emperors
37  7,1|          set forth on the march. Robert, the duke of Normandy, son
38  7,1|           The rude and irascible Robert II, count of Flanders, son
39  7,1|        count of Flanders, son of Robert of Flanders, also took part
40  7,1|          the middle French army; Robert of Normandy and Robert of
41  7,1|           Robert of Normandy and Robert of Flanders, at the head
42  7,1|     Bohemond of Tarentum, son of Robert Guiscard, and his nephew
43  7,1|          to carry out his father Robert Guiscard’s campaign of 1081,
44  7,1|       later 1178‑1179) a certain Robert was sent to the court of
45  8,9|      death of the Latin Emperor, Robert de Courtenay (1228), the