Chapter, Paragraph

 1  2,2 |         Byzantine,” culture. Th. I. Uspensky wrote:~ ~The choice of a
 2  2,3 |        statue to the Senate. Th. I. Uspensky spoke of this plea as “the
 3  2,4 |            but the historian Th. I. Uspensky affirmed that this alone
 4  2,5 |             to recall,” said Th. I. Uspensky, “that these three names
 5  2,5 |         sums of money,” said Th. I. Uspensky, “Vitalian revealed to the
 6  3,8 |        printing press,” said Th. I. Uspensky, “the Hippodrome became
 7  4,1 | twentieth-century historian, Th. I. Uspensky, compared Heraclius’ war
 8  4,1 |             and conjectures. Th. I. Uspensky, who directed the excavations,
 9  4,4 |      instituted in Armenia.[91] Th. Uspensky called attention to the
10  5,3 |              Vasilievsky and Th. I. Uspensky who characterized this document
11  5,3 |           modern literature. Th. I. Uspensky, however, overestimated
12  5,3 |        representatives.”[55] Th. I. Uspensky wrote: “Only in the time
13  5,4 |             art.[67] Finally, C. N. Uspensky shifted the emphasis from
14  5,5 |            against the monks; C. N. Uspensky stated definitely that “
15  5,7 |            in the Outlines of C. N. Uspensky. Finally, Th. I. Uspensky
16  5,7 |           Uspensky. Finally, Th. I. Uspensky remarked; “Leo the Isaurian
17  5,8 |             the perverters.” Th. I. Uspensky asserted that “there is
18  6,7 |        Amalfitan. Bishop Porphyrius Uspensky, a profound Russian student
19  7,1 |          the Latins in 1182, as Th. Uspensky said, “the seed of the fanatic
20  7,1 |      Another Russian historian, Th. Uspensky, wrote: “In the winter of
21  7,1 |     scholars V. Vasilievsky and Th. Uspensky, considered the letter authentic;
22  7,1 |             the Russian scholar Th. Uspensky called it “a fatal step
23  7,1 |         Sybel and following him Th. Uspensky, even spoke of the conclusion
24  7,1 |            Myriocephalon,” said Th. Uspensky. “Having reconciled the
25  7,1 |          the Russian historian, Th. Uspensky, “is interesting particularly
26  7,1 |           of the Comneni,” said Th. Uspensky, “was or at least seemed
27  7,4 |           by a Russian scholar, Th. Uspensky, opens an interesting page
28  7,4 |         this problem. While, as Th. Uspensky said, “the freedom of philosophical
29  7,4 |           scholars, for example Th. Uspensky, judge it possible, on the
30  7,4 |     complete whole; perhaps, as Th. Uspensky supposed, it has not yet
31  7,4 |           on Nicetas Choniates, Th. Uspensky wrote: “Nicetas is worthy
32  8,2 |            5.[8] This alliance, Th. Uspensky said, “put an end to Kalojan’
33  8,16|       opinion, another scholar, Th. Uspensky, wrote of the same work: “
34  8,17|            Russian Byzantinist, Th. Uspensky, plainly stated that the
35  8,17|            kharistikion, especially Uspensky’s, are accepted, it must
36  8,17|             the Justinian Code. Th. Uspensky, who regarded the Slavonic
37  8,17|           pronoia. According to Th. Uspensky, in Byzantium the term pronoia “
38  9,9 |           scholars, for example Th. Uspensky, believe that “the Turks
39  9,13|          triumph for the monks. Th. Uspensky came to the conclusion that
40  9,13|       rather contradictory, and Th. Uspensky, for example, was inclined
41  9,17|        scholars, Bishop Porphyrius (Uspensky), P. Sevastyanov, T. Florinsky,
42  9,18|       example, Sathas and later Th. Uspensky) to consider Metochites
43  9,19|              A Russian scholar, Th. Uspensky, wrote on the same subject: “
44  9,19|          much of his knowledge, Th. Uspensky said that “the importance