Chapter, Paragraph

 1  2,2 |          or “Byzantine,” culture. Th. I. Uspensky wrote:~ ~The
 2  2,3 |         the statue to the Senate. Th. I. Uspensky spoke of this
 3  2,4 |       Butcher,” but the historian Th. I. Uspensky affirmed that
 4  2,5 |       sufficient to recall,” said Th. I. Uspensky, “that these
 5  2,5 |     enormous sums of money,” said Th. I. Uspensky, “Vitalian
 6  3,8 |         the printing press,” said Th. I. Uspensky, “the Hippodrome
 7  4,1 |      twentieth-century historian, Th. I. Uspensky, compared Heraclius’
 8  4,1 |       hypotheses and conjectures. Th. I. Uspensky, who directed
 9  4,4 |        instituted in Armenia.[91] Th. Uspensky called attention
10  5,3 |    scholars V. G. Vasilievsky and Th. I. Uspensky who characterized
11  5,3 |      denied in modern literature. Th. I. Uspensky, however, overestimated
12  5,3 |    military representatives.”[55] Th. I. Uspensky wrote: “Only
13  5,7 |          C. N. Uspensky. Finally, Th. I. Uspensky remarked; “
14  5,8 |    perverted and the perverters.” Th. I. Uspensky asserted that “
15  7,1 |         of the Latins in 1182, as Th. Uspensky said, “the seed
16  7,1 |        Another Russian historian, Th. Uspensky, wrote: “In the
17  7,1 |       scholars V. Vasilievsky and Th. Uspensky, considered the
18  7,1 |        idea;” the Russian scholar Th. Uspensky called it “a fatal
19  7,1 |           Sybel and following him Th. Uspensky, even spoke of
20  7,1 |           at Myriocephalon,” said Th. Uspensky. “Having reconciled
21  7,1 |      wrote the Russian historian, Th. Uspensky, “is interesting
22  7,1 |     dynasty of the Comneni,” said Th. Uspensky, “was or at least
23  7,4 | interpreted by a Russian scholar, Th. Uspensky, opens an interesting
24  7,4 |           this problem. While, as Th. Uspensky said, “the freedom
25  7,4 |        some scholars, for example Th. Uspensky, judge it possible,
26  7,4 |       complete whole; perhaps, as Th. Uspensky supposed, it has
27  7,4 |   monograph on Nicetas Choniates, Th. Uspensky wrote: “Nicetas
28  8,2 |         1204-5.[8] This alliance, Th. Uspensky said, “put an
29  8,16|         opinion, another scholar, Th. Uspensky, wrote of the
30  8,17|        noted Russian Byzantinist, Th. Uspensky, plainly stated
31  8,17|          into the Justinian Code. Th. Uspensky, who regarded
32  8,17|      called pronoia. According to Th. Uspensky, in Byzantium
33  9,9 |        some scholars, for example Th. Uspensky, believe that “
34  9,13|   complete triumph for the monks. Th. Uspensky came to the conclusion
35  9,13|         rather contradictory, and Th. Uspensky, for example,
36  9,18|         example, Sathas and later Th. Uspensky) to consider Metochites
37  9,18|        century by Strzygowski and Th. Schmidt, consists of the
38  9,18|       later Byzantine art.”[430]~ Th. Schmidt maintained that
39  9,19|           451] A Russian scholar, Th. Uspensky, wrote on the
40  9,19|        for much of his knowledge, Th. Uspensky said that “the