Chapter, Paragraph

 1  2,2|        was in harmony with his views at the time but was not
 2  2,3|     held diametrically opposed views on the relation between
 3  2,4|    those who did not share his views on the independence of the
 4  2,5|      wholly according with the views of the Pope of Rome. The
 5  2,5|    philosophical and Christian views. This bishop-philosopher
 6  3,3|       a matter of his personal views. They seemed quite natural
 7  3,8|      in spite of defending the views of the nobility and in spite
 8  4,1|      determined to express his views openly, at first as a modest
 9  4,4|        as well as the mystical views of the so-called “Dionysius
10  4,4|      systematic account of his views, and they must be winnowed
11  5,4|   Paparrigopoulo, whose biased views with regard to the Ecloga
12  5,4|        Such, in brief, are the views of Paparrigopoulo with regard
13  5,4|  acquainted with the religious views prevalent in the eastern
14  5,4|        they grew up with these views and were closely identified
15  5,4|      throne they brought their views to the capital and made
16  5,4|      to make his own religious views compulsory for all his subjects.
17  5,5|       validity of iconoclastic views in the conscience of the
18  5,5|     form decisive iconoclastic views,”[89] The mass of the people
19  5,6| accordance with the prevailing views of the period. In upholding
20  5,8|       conceal his iconoclastic views; but as soon as he deposed
21  5,8|        regarding the religious views of Leo’s successor, Michael
22  5,8|     convictions, but professed views in accordance with their
23  5,8| correctness of the iconodulist views. He refutes the arguments
24  5,8|  Theodora for his iconoclastic views, Leo continued to teach
25  6,8|  insight into the government’s views on education and juridical
26  7,4|     the light it throws on the views of the two chief participants