Chapter, Paragraph

  1  1,2 |                          The Oral Gospel.~Such oral tradition was
  2  1,2 |        these forms in any written gospel. It is reasonable to suppose
  3  1,2 |        whether or not the Gnostic Gospel of Thomas is actually based
  4  1,2 |     exactly which portions of the gospel materials come directly
  5  1,4 |           author of the Johannine gospel and epistles are opposed
  6  1,6 |     Gospels — that the letter and gospel types were first set powerfully
  7  1,6 |        that the acceptance of the gospel released new powers in the
  8  2,2 |           at the beginning of the gospel preaching?” Chapter 47 begins,
  9  2,2 |     acquaintance with any written gospel; his quotations of Jesus'
 10  2,4 |       from those expressed in the Gospel of Matthew, and it appears
 11  2,4 |       half of the “Didache,” that Gospel was used. Some of the coincidences
 12  2,5 |      Ignatius and the letters and Gospel of John. Ignatius is the
 13  2,8 |      Letter to the Romans and the Gospel of Matthew had grappled
 14  2,8 |    Revelation of Peter,” and the “Gospel of the Hebrews — not among
 15  2,9 |       toward the end of it in the Gospel of the Twelve Apostles.~
 16  2,9 |            never mentioned in the gospel lists of apostles. The book
 17  2,9 |          4), which appears in the Gospel of Thomas and is quoted
 18  2,9 |       derived the story from that gospel; he may have gotten it from
 19  3   |   first-century Christianity, the Gospel of Mark, I Peter, 1 Clement,
 20  3   |       Clement, and the Shepherd-a gospel, a church letter, a general
 21  3   |        like Daniel and Enoch. The Gospel of Mark, about A.D. 70,
 22  3   |      considerable fragment of the Gospel of Peter, in a hand not
 23  4,1 |        Basilides dared to write a gospel and give it his name....
 24  4,1 |          it his name.... I know a gospel that is called 'According
 25  4,1 |           read many others.”~ The gospel is Christianity's first
 26  4,1 |         types. The primitive oral gospel may have originated the
 27  4,1 |        written embodiment was the Gospel of Mark, from which every
 28  4,1 |            from which every other gospel inside or outside the New
 29  4,1 |       miss the originality of the gospel as a literary type, which
 30  4,1 |     literary fact about the whole gospel literature.~ ~
 31  4,2 |                      The Fourfold Gospel.~ It was not so much the
 32  4,2 |    Luke-Acts was much more than a gospel, and the separation of its
 33  4,2 |      second not only enriched the gospel corpus but left the Acts
 34  4,2 |      immense effectiveness of the gospel as a type of literature,
 35  4,2 |        the epilogue of the Fourth Gospel, perhaps added to anticipate
 36  4,2 |           opposition that the new gospel might encounter by its very
 37  4,2 |       unfamiliar material another gospel would inevitably offer.
 38  4,2 |        door was still open to new gospel narratives. Certainly a
 39  4,2 |          independently to write a gospel without ever having seen
 40  4,2 |          sight of the fact that a gospel was by no means an inevitable
 41  4,2 |         is the distinction of the Gospel of Mark. It was soon improved
 42  4,2 |         John also made use of the gospel as a literary form. The
 43  4,2 |         quoted, at the end of the Gospel of John. This situation
 44  4,2 |       most of what we find in the Gospel of the Hebrews and the Gospel
 45  4,2 |     Gospel of the Hebrews and the Gospel of Thomas. Sometimes, as
 46  4,3 |                               The Gospel according to the Egyptians.~
 47  4,3 |           the second century: the Gospel according to the Egyptians,
 48  4,3 |   according to the Egyptians, the Gospel according to the Hebrews,
 49  4,3 |     according to the Hebrews, the Gospel of Peter, and the Gospel
 50  4,3 |          Gospel of Peter, and the Gospel of Thomas.~ The Gospel of
 51  4,3 |        the Gospel of Thomas.~ The Gospel of the Egyptians and the
 52  4,3 |          of the Egyptians and the Gospel of the Hebrews were apparently
 53  4,3 |         64, 66). According to the Gospel of Mark, Salome was a witness
 54  4,4 |                               The Gospel according to the Hebrews.~
 55  4,4 |    according to the Hebrews.~ The Gospel according to the Hebrews
 56  4,4 |      original Aramaic form of the Gospel of Matthew, and Jerome does
 57  4,4 |           error. The fact is, the Gospel of the Hebrews borrowed
 58  4,4 |         borrowed so much from the Gospel of Matthew that they naturally
 59  4,4 |         may also be traced in the Gospel of the Hebrews; indeed,
 60  4,4 |          writer knew the Fourfold Gospel. That he should have independently
 61  4,4 |     independently struck upon the gospel type of literature and created
 62  4,4 |  literature and created a written gospel without ever having seen
 63  4,4 |          becomes impossible.~ The Gospel of the Hebrews, like that
 64  4,4 |       publication of the Fourfold Gospel and its arrival at the status
 65  4,4 |   seven-eighths the length of the Gospel ofr~ Matthew, containing
 66  4,4 |          Ignatius was quoting the Gospel of the Hebrews. But there
 67  4,4 |        which Jerome found in this gospel (On Illustrious Men 2).
 68  4,4 |         which is contained in the Gospel according to the Hebrews:”
 69  4,4 |           into manuscripts of the Gospel of John in the seventh chapter
 70  4,4 |          he says, is found in the Gospel of the Hebrews (Miscellanies
 71  4,4 |           fragments belong to the Gospel of Thomas it is likely that
 72  4,4 |           traditions.~ One of the gospel fragments from Oxyrhynchus (
 73  4,4 |        and flute girls”) with the Gospel of the Hebrews and, notwithstanding
 74  4,4 |     practices, may come from that gospel. Its diffuse style and evidently
 75  4,4 |     ceremonial purification.~ The Gospel of the Hebrews, therefore,
 76  4,4 |      about it: “If any accept the Gospel according to the Hebrews” (
 77  4,4 |           came to be known as the Gospel of the Nazarenes. Jerome'
 78  4,4 |         Jewish Christians, used a gospel resembling Matthew, which
 79  4,4 |         from earlier writers. The Gospel of the Hebrews fades from
 80  4,4 |           Barnabas. A copy of the Gospel ofthe Hebrews, either in
 81  4,5 |                               The Gospel according to Peter.~ The
 82  4,5 |       letters of Ignatius and the Gospel and Letters of John, which
 83  4,5 |       arose the idea of writing a gospel to tell the story, at least
 84  4,5 |        fragment of this long-lost gospel. It was written upon five
 85  4,5 |       times.~ The fragment of the Gospel of Peter began abruptly
 86  4,5 |     possible that the Oxyrhynchus gospel fragment 1224, a badly broken
 87  4,5 |           century, refers to this gospel, which probably emphasized
 88  4,5 |  emphasized those portions of the gospel story in which Peter was
 89  4,5 |           150, may have known the Gospel of Peter, for he occasionally
 90  4,5 |           makes no mention of the Gospel of Peter, Origen, in the
 91  4,5 |           A.D- 326), mentions the Gospel of Peter and records Serapion'
 92  4,5 |      fifth century, refers to the Gospel according to Peter as being
 93  4,5 |         its text was written, the gospel was already disappearing;
 94  4,5 |        almost the only apocryphal gospel written pseudonymously in
 95  4,5 |        present sectarian views in gospel form.~ ~
 96  4,6 |                The British Museum Gospel.~ Sometime in the second
 97  4,6 |        Christian in Egypt wrote a gospel, or rather he condensed
 98  4,6 |    practical purpose to produce a gospel which should be at the same
 99  4,6 |    earliest users of the Fourfold Gospel, as it has been to so many
100  4,6 |         be tampered with, the new gospel writer had no inhibitions
101  4,6 |           He saw how the Fourfold Gospel could be improved, as he
102  4,6 |         would expect it to be the Gospel of the Egyptians, but it
103  4,6 |         or another; moreover, the Gospel of the Egyptians was not
104  4,6 |           we identify it with the Gospel of the Hebrews or with that
105  4,6 |     writer of this British Museum gospel probably had the Fourfold
106  4,6 |         probably had the Fourfold Gospel in his possession and made
107  4,6 |            Our evidence about the gospel usage in Alexandria, at
108  4,6 |       probably contained only the Gospel of John.~ The contents of
109  4,7 |                       The Infancy Gospel of Thomas.~ The existence
110  4,7 | Refutation v. 7. 20). The infancy gospel contains a story about Jesus'
111  4,7 |         however, that the infancy gospel of Thomas was the Marcosians'
112  4,7 |            The later form of this gospel contains many stories about
113  4,7 |          stands, the crude little gospel reflects an ancient impulse
114  4,8 |          book under his name, the Gospel of Matthias, mentioned by
115  4,8 |          by Origen along with the Gospel of Thomas, as among the
116  4,8 |       however, is known of such a gospel except Origen's mention
117  4,8 |           Secret Sayings, and the Gospel ofMatthias.~ ~
118  4,9 |                               The Gospel ofthe Ebionites.~ Among
119  4,9 |          the Ebionites produced a gospel embodying their views. It
120  4,9 |       According to Matthew,” “the Gospel of the Hebrews,” “the Gospel
121  4,9 |      Gospel of the Hebrews,” “the Gospel of the Twelve,” “the Gospel
122  4,9 |       Gospel of the Twelve,” “the Gospel of the Ebionites.” Only
123  4,9 |      designate its title, for the Gospel of the Ebionites was identical
124  4,9 |  Ebionites was identical with the Gospel of the Twelve (Apostles),
125  4,9 |            Apostles), whereas the Gospel of the Hebrews was another
126  4,9 |       another book entirely.~ The Gospel ofthe Ebionites was naturally
127  4,9 |  Epiphanius, it is clear that the Gospel of the Ebionites opposed
128  4,9 |       quotations, with which this gospel may have begun, reads:~ ~
129  4,9 |       testimony to Israel!~ ~This gospel described the food of John
130  4,9 |          gospels in writing their gospel but actually wrote theirs
131  4,9 |           chief informant on this gospel through his quotations from
132  4,9 |      Passover. They show that the Gospel ofthe Ebionites was not
133  4,9 |       ofthe Ebionites was not the Gospel of the Hebrews, for their
134  4,9 |          products of Ebionism-the gospel and the Greek version of
135  4,9 |    earliest writer to mention the Gospel ofthe Twelve, as he called
136  4,10|         the Book of James (On the Gospel of Matthew 13: 55). Clement
137  4,10|          gospels, calling it the “Gospel under the name of James
138  4,10|     leaves much to be desired. No gospel is more completely fiction.
139  4,10|    Gelasian Decree” calls it the “Gospel of James the Less.” Its
140  4,10|      Joseph the Carpenter, of the Gospel ofthe Pseudo-Matthew, of
141  4,10|           Mary, and of the Arabic Gospel of the Infancy. It was summarized
142  4,10|           a number of present-day gospel imitations, such as the
143  4,10|  imitations, such as the Aquarian Gospel. Its scenes were richly
144  4,10|           writers. The first, the Gospel of Truth, was a product
145  4,10|        supposed that it was not a gospel at all but simply a presentation
146  4,10|          century. The second, the Gospel of Philip, “the holy disciple,”
147  4,10|            This suggests that the Gospel of Philip was written by
148  4,10|          should first mention the Gospel of Judas, which Irenaeus
149  4,10|          Other such works are the Gospel of Eve, from which Epiphanius
150  4,10|     Heresies xxvi. 2, 3), and the Gospel of Perfection, which he
151  4,10|       comes the still unpublished Gospel of the Egyptians or Book
152  4,11|                               The Gospel of Truth.~ For the present
153  4,11|         documents. First came the Gospel of Truth, which may be the
154  4,11|           may be the Valentinian “gospel” of which Irenaeus spoke.
155  4,11|            It is certainly not a “gospel” in any conventional sense (
156  4,12|                               The Gospel of Thomas.~ Next came the
157  4,12|         of Thomas.~ Next came the Gospel of Thomas, which consists
158  4,12|          what is preserved in the Gospel ofthe Hebrews or the Gospel
159  4,12|       Gospel ofthe Hebrews or the Gospel ofthe Egyptians; sometimes
160  4,12|           actually come from this gospel, and that the book itself
161  4,13|                               The Gospel of Philip.~ The Gospel of
162  4,13|        The Gospel of Philip.~ The Gospel of Philip[23] is not really
163  4,13|        Philip[23] is not really a gospel but an apparently miscellaneous
164  4,14|         published by Till are the Gospel of Mary and the Sophia of
165  4,14|         disciple according to the Gospel of Philip). The second,
166  4,14|        that Irenaeus ascribed the Gospel of Truth to the Gnostic
167  4,14|           specifically mentions a Gospel of Basilides (Homily 1 on
168  4,14|         of Jesus now found in the Gospel of Thomas, and that they
169  4,14|    writers. Epiphanius mentions a Gospel of Cerinthus (Heresies li.
170  4,14|        Heresies li. 7); Jerome, a Gospel of Apelles (Preface to Matthew).
171  5,1 |         so pointed toward further gospel writing, the Book of Acts
172  5,1 |      two-volume work of Luke, the Gospel and the Acts, was divided,
173  5,1 |        Acts, was divided, and the gospel volume was taken out of
174  5,2 |       more than twice that of the Gospel of Mark. Tertullian tells
175  5,4 |      already ascribing the Fourth Gospel and the Revelation. Who
176  5,4 |          or about the size of the Gospel of Matthew. The Greek Acts
177  5,5 |  contained in the epilogue of the Gospel of John, 21:18, 19: “When
178  5,5 |      apostles Peter and Paul. The Gospel of Matthew contained a strong
179  5,5 |           Peter, and probably the Gospel of the Egyptians (in chap.
180  5,5 |          service. Peter finds the gospel being read in the dining-hall
181  5,6 |            Tatian had carried the gospel in Syriac into eastern Syria
182  5,7 |          traces of the use of the Gospel ofthe Hebrews (“they do
183  5,7 |             chap. 136) and of the Gospel of the Egyptians (“him that
184  5,7 |           or more probably of the Gospel of Thomas, which contains
185  6,1 |     characteristic touches in the Gospel and Letters of John, and,
186  6,2 |         use of something like the Gospel ofthe Egyptians, especially
187  6,2 |    Clement of Alexandria from the Gospel of the Egyptians (Miscellanies
188  6,2 |       oral tradition or from that gospel, but the writer is also
189  6,2 |   especially his knowledge of the Gospel of the Egyptians, brings
190  6,2 |      traditions like those in the Gospel of the Egyptians are current
191  6,2 |            or Rome. And while the Gospel of the Egyptians is mentioned
192  6,3 |           about the origin of the Gospel of Mark:~ ~Mark having become
193  6,3 |         be the author of the oral gospel.~ Eusebius calls Papias
194  6,3 |         to whom John dictated his gospel. Most of these writers indicate
195  7,1 |          followed in carrying the gospel about the Greek world, to
196  7,1 |          this saying stood in the Gospel of the Hebrews (On Illustrious
197  7,1 |       that both Ignatius and that gospel derived it from the Preaching
198  7,1 |        Preaching is quoted in the Gospel ofthe Hebrews (A.D. 120-
199  7,1 |       some of his comments on the Gospel of Luke. Heracleon wrote
200  7,1 |         wrote a commentary on the Gospel of John, of which Origen
201  7,1 |       Aristides in Athens and the Gospel ofthe Hebrews in Egypt in
202  7,1 |   influenced Eusebius to date the Gospel of Matthew in A.D. 41, when
203  7,1 |     Jerusalem and would write his gospel to leave behind him. The
204  7,1 |       with the Acts of Peter, the Gospel of Peter, and the Revelation
205  8,3 |       into Hades and preached the gospel, to the dead (24:2). Medieval
206  8,4 |        really Christian books-the Gospel of Luke and the ten letters
207  8,4 |         meet it). The Law and the Gospel were set forth as irreconcilable
208  8,4 |        Marcion is speaking of the Gospel: “O wealth of riches! Folly,
209  9,3 |        Illustrious Men 25) adds a gospel harmony, or a commentary
210  9,3 |        down to us; it is from the Gospel of John, which he describes
211 11,3 |          efforts to propagate the gospel.~ For Clement was not content,
212 11,3 |        appeal to their own secret gospel of Mark but admits that
213 11,3 |           also possesses a secret gospel that Mark wrote after he
214 11,3 |         had produced the ordinary gospel at Rome and had gone to
215 11,3 |           way in which the secret gospel differs from the ordinary
216 11,3 |         ordinary one. This secret gospel, he says, is available only
217 11,3 |           Address 8). He knew the Gospel of the Hebrews, the Gospel
218 11,3 |        Gospel of the Hebrews, the Gospel ofthe Egyptians, and the
219 13,4 |    John-the work In Defense ofthe Gospel and Revelation of John,
220 13,11|           his Preparation for the Gospel (xiv. 23-27). There was
221 13,11|           ideas with those of the Gospel of John and came to the
222 13,11|     Eusebius (Preparation for the Gospel vii 19). Athanasius came
223 14,6 |       scripture consisting of the Gospel of Luke and ten letters
224 15,4 |           the Preparation for the Gospel, which he wrote between
225 16   |         Sophia; no Greek text~The Gospel ofthe Egyptians; no complete
226 16   |   Egyptians; no complete text~The Gospel ofthe Hebrews; no complete
227 16   |     Hebrews; no complete text~The Gospel of Peter; no complete text~
228 16   |           text~The British Museum Gospel; no complete text~The Gospel
229 16   |      Gospel; no complete text~The Gospel of Thomas; no complete Greek
230 16   |          of Matthias; no text~The Gospel of Matthias(?); no text~
231 16   |          Matthias(?); no text~The Gospel of Ebionites; no text~The
232 16   |         of Ebionites; no text~The Gospel of Basilides; no text~The
233 16   |         of Basilides; no text~The Gospel of Judas(?); no text~The
234 16   |          of Judas(?); no text~The Gospel of Truth; no Greek text~
235 16   |          Truth; no Greek text~The Gospel of Philip; no Greek text~
236 16   |         Philip; no Greek text~The Gospel of Bartholomew(?); no text~
237 16   |       Bartholomew(?); no text~The Gospel of Barnabas(?); no text~
238 16   |          Barnabas(?); no text~The Gospel of Apelles(?); no text~The
239 16   |           Apelles(?); no text~The Gospel of Cerinthus(?); no text~
240 16   |         Cerinthus(?); no text~The Gospel of Eve(?); no text~The Gospel
241 16   |     Gospel of Eve(?); no text~The Gospel of Perfection(?); no text~
242 16   |       Against Marcion; no text~ A Gospel Harmony (?); no text~Irenaeus,
243 16   |          no text~In Defense ofthe Gospel and Revelation of John;
244 16   |          In this it resembles the Gospel of Peter, in which the apostles
245 16   |           M. Wilson (trans.), The Gospel According to Philip (London,
246 16   |       Armenian “Exposition of the Gospel,” especially the Parables,